Identification of Czech Metropolitan Regions: How to improve targeting of innovation policy

1. Albertina Database. (2014). Databáze firem a institucí ALBERTINA CZ Gold Edition. Praha: Bisnode. Retrieved from DVD database.Search in Google Scholar

2. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (2002). Regional innovation systems: the integration of local ‘sticky’ and global ‘ubiquitous’ knowledge. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 77–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1013100704794Search in Google Scholar

3. Bučar, M., Jaklič, A., & Stare, M. (2010). Innovation potential of public and private sectors' cooperation in knowledge-intensive services in Slovenia. Naše gospodarstvo, 56(5–6), 29–35.Search in Google Scholar

4. Buesa, M., Heijs, J., Pellitero, M. M., & Baumert, T. (2006). Regional systems of innovation and the knowledge production function: the Spanish case. Technovation, 26(4), 463–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.11.007Search in Google Scholar

5. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365–382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9Search in Google Scholar

6. Cooke, P. (2004). Introduction: Regional innovation systems—an evolutionary approach. In P. N. Cooke, M. Heidenreich, & H. J. Braczyk (Eds.), Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world (pp. 1–18). London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., & Tödtling, F. (2000). The governance of innovation in Europe: Regional perspectives on global competitiveness. London and New York: Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

8. CZSO. (2013a). Statistické ročenky krajů 2013. Retrieved from www.czso.czSearch in Google Scholar

9. CZSO. (2013b). Ukazatele výzkumu a vývoje podle krajů České republiky 2005–2012. Retrieved from www.czso.czSearch in Google Scholar

10. CZSO. (2014). Inovační aktivity podniků v ČR—2010 až 2012. Prague: Czech Statistical Office.Search in Google Scholar

11. Dautel, V., & Walther, O. (2014). The geography of innovation in a small metropolitan region: An intra-regional approach in Luxembourg. Papers in Regional Science, 93(4), 703–725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12019Search in Google Scholar

12. Doloreux, D. (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society, 24(3), 243–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00007-6Search in Google Scholar

13. Doloreux, D., & Parto, S. (2005). Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues. Technology in Society, 27(2), 133–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.01.002Search in Google Scholar

14. Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (1999). Systems of innovation: theory and policy for the demand side. Technology in Society, 21(1), 63–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(98)00037-2Search in Google Scholar

15. Fischer, M. M. (2001). Innovation, knowledge creation and systems of innovation. The Annals of Regional Science, 35(2), 199–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001680000034Search in Google Scholar

16. Freeman, C. (2002). Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems—complementarity and economic growth. Research Policy, 31(2), 191–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00136-6Search in Google Scholar

17. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899–933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4Search in Google Scholar

18. Isaksen, A. (2001). Building regional innovation systems: is endogenous industrial development possible in the global economy? Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24(1), 101–120.Search in Google Scholar

19. Kaufmann, A. (2007). Patterns of innovation relations in metropolitan regions: the case of the Vienna urban region. The Annals of Regional Science, 41(3), 735–748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0119-5Search in Google Scholar

20. Klímová, V., & Žítek, V. (2015). Inovační paradox v Česku: Ekonomická teorie a politická realita. Politická Ekonomie, 2015(2), 147–166. http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.994Search in Google Scholar

21. Kutscherauer, A., Fachinelli, H., Hučka, M., Skokan, K., Sucháček, J., Tománek, P., & Tuleja, P. (2010). Regionální disparity v územním rozvoji České republiky—jejich vznik, identifikace a eliminace. Ostrava: VSB-Technical University Ostrava.Search in Google Scholar

22. Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. Globelics Academy. Retrieved from www.globelicsacademy.netSearch in Google Scholar

23. Lundvall, B. A. (2010). National systems of innovation. Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Anthem Press.10.7135/UPO9781843318903Search in Google Scholar

24. Mavrič, J., Tominc, P., & Bobek, V. (2014). Qualitative indicators for measuring the performance development of selected cities. Naše Gospodarstvo, 60(3–4), 13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.7549/ourecon.2014.3-4.02Search in Google Scholar

25. Melecký, L., & Staníčková, M. (2011). Hodnocení konkurenceschopnosti regionů České republiky v kontextu Lisabonské strategie. Ekonomická Revue, 14(3), 183–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.7327/cerei.2011.09.04Search in Google Scholar

26. Metcalfe, S., & Ramlogan, R. (2008). Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economies. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48(2), 433–446. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.021Search in Google Scholar

27. Mytelka, L. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy, 31(8), 1467–1479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00076-8Search in Google Scholar

28. Poledníková, E., & Lelková, P. (2012). Evaluation of regional disparities in Visegrad four countries, Germany and Austria using the cluster analysis. In V. Klímová & V. Žítek (Eds.) 15th International Colloquium on Regional Sciences (pp. 36–47). Brno: Masaryk University.Search in Google Scholar

29. Powell, W. W., & Grodal, S. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 56–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

30. Tijssen, R. J. W. (1998). Quantitative assessment of large heterogeneous R&D networks: The case of process engineering in the Netherlands. Research Policy, 26(7–8), 791–809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00060-7Search in Google Scholar

31. Tödtling, F., & Kaufmann, A. (1999). Innovation systems in regions of Europe—A comparative perspective. European Planning Studies, 7(6), 699–717. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654319908720549Search in Google Scholar

32. Tödtling, F., & Trippl, M. (2005). One size fits all? Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203–1219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018Search in Google Scholar

33. Tödtling, F., Skokan, K., Höglinger, C., Rumpel, P., & Grillitsch, M. (2013). Innovation and knowledge sourcing of modern sectors in old industrial regions: comparing software firms in Moravia-Silesia and Upper Austria. European Urban and Regional Studies, 20(2), 188–205.10.1177/0969776411428498Search in Google Scholar

34. Trippl, M., Asheim, B., & Miorner, J. (2015). Identification of regions with less developed research and innovation systems. Lund University Working Paper 2015(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969776411428498Search in Google Scholar

35. Viturka, M., Halámek, P., Klímová, V., Tonev, P., & Žítek, V. (2010). Kvalita podnikatelského prostředí, regionální konkurenceschopnost a strategie regionálního rozvoje České republiky. Praha: Grada publishing.Search in Google Scholar