[1. Ambrose, M. L., Schminke, M. (2009). The Role of Overall Justice Judgments in Organizational Justice Research: A Test of Mediation // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 94, No. 2, p. 491-500. doi: 10.1037/a0013203.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Ambrose, M. L., Wo, D. H., Griffith, M. D. (2015). Overall Justice: Past, Present, and Future / In The Oxford Handbook of Justice in the Workplace, ed. R. S. Cropanzano, M. L. Ambrose - Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 109-132. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199981410.013.5.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator- Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 51, p. 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Beugre, C. D., Baron, R. A. (2001). Perceptions of Systemic Justice: The Effects of Distributive, Procedural and Interactional Justice // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 324-339. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00199.x.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Choi, J. (2008). Event Justice Perceptions and Employees’ Reactions: Perceptions of Social Entity Justice as a Moderator // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 93, No. 3, p. 513-528. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.513.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. L. H., Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 86, No. 3, p. 425-445. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J. (2004). Organizational Justice: A Fair Assessment of the State of the Literature / In Organizational Behavior: The State of the Science, ed. J. Greenberg. - Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Colquitt, J. A., Shaw, J. C. (2005). How Should Organizational Justice Be Measured? / In The Handbook of Organizational Justice, ed. J. Greenberg, J. Colquitt. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, p. 113-152.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Cook, J. D., Hepworth, S. J., Wall, T. D., Warr, P. B. (1981). The Experience of Work. A Compendium and Review of 249 Measures and their Use.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Cropanzano, R., Byrne, Z. S., Bobocel, D. R., Rupp, D. R. (2001). Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice // Journal of Vocational Behavior. Vol. 58, No. 2, p. 164-209. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Cropanzano, R., Chrobot-Mason, D., Rupp, D. E., Prehar, C. A. (2004). Accountability for Corporate Injustice // Human Resource Management Review. Vol. 14, No. 1, p. 107-133. doi: 0.1016/j.hrmr.2004.02.006.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Cropanzano, R., Greenberg, J. (1997). Progress in Organizational Justice: Tunneling through The Maze / In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, ed. C. L. Cooper and I. T. Robertson. - Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Vol. 12, p. 317-372.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Čekanavičius, V., Murauskas, G. (2004). Statistika ir jos taikymai II. Vilnius: TEV.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Fields, D. L. (2002). Taking The Measure of Work. a Guide to Validates Scales for Organizational Research and Diagnosis. - Thousand Oaks; London; New Delhi: Sage Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Gilliland, S. W., Paddock, L. (2005). Organizational Justice Across Human Resource Management Decisions // In International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, ed. G. P. Hodgkinson and J. K. Ford - John West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons. Vol. 20, p. 149-177.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of Perceived Fairness of Performance Evaluations // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 71, No. 2, p. 340-342. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.340.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Hayes, A. F. (2012). Process: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling. Internet access: <http://www.afhayes> [accessed December 12, 2016].]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Hollensbe, E. C., Khazanchi, S., Masterson, S. S. (2008). How do I Assess if My Supervisor and Organization are Fair? Identifying the Rules Underlying Entity-Based Justice Perceptions //Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 51, No. 6, p. 1099-1116. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732600.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Holtz, B. C., Harold, C. M. (2009). Fair Today, Fair Tomorrow? A Longitudinal Investigation ofOverall Justice Perceptions // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 94, No. 5, p. 1185-1199. doi: 10.1037/a0015900.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Jones, D. A., Martens, M. L. (2009). The Mediating Role of Overall Fairness and the Moderating Role of Trust Certainty in Justice-Criteria Relationships: The Formation and Use of Fairness Heuristics in The Workplace // Journal of Organizational Behavior. Vol. 30, No. 8, p. 1025-1051. doi: 10.1002/job.577.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Jones, D. A., Skarlicki, D. P. (2005). The Effects of Overhearing Peers Discuss an Authority’s Reputation for Fairness on Reactions to Subsequent Treatment // Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 90, No. 2, p. 363-372. doi: 10.1037/002190 10. 90.2.363.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Kim, T., Leung, K. (2007). Forming and Reacting to Overall Fairness: A Cross-Cultural Comparison // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 104, No. 1, p. 83-95. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.01.004.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Konovsky, M. A., Pugh, S. D. (1994). Citizenship Behavior and Social Exchange // Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 37, No. 3, p. 656-669. doi: 10.2307/256704.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Kray, L. J., Lind, E. A. (2002). The Injustices of Others: Social Reports and The Integration of Others’ Experiences in Organizational Justice Judgments // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 89, No. 1, p. 906-924. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00035-3.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Kuvaas, B. (2008). An Exploration of How the Employee-Organization Relationship Affects the Linkage Between Perception of Developmental Human Resource Practices and Employee Outcomes // Journal Of Management Studies. Vol. 45, No. 1, p. 1-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00710.x.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The Distribution of Rewards and Resources in Groups and Organizations // In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. L. Berkowitz L. and W. Walster - New York: Academic Press. Vol. 9, p. 91-131.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? // In Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, ed. K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg and R. H. Willis - New York: Plenum, p. 27-55.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness Heuristic Theory: Justice Judgments as Pivotal Cognitions in Organizational Relations / In Advances in Organizational Justice, ed. J. Greenberg and R. Cropanzano - Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, p. 56-88.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Lind, E. A., Kray, L., Thompson, L. (1998). The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others’ Unfair Treatment by Authorities // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 75, No. 1, p. 1-22. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2785.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Masterson, S. S., Taylor, M. S. (1996). The Broadening of Procedural Justice: Should Interactional and Procedural Components Be Separate Theories? // Paper presented at the 1996 Academy of Management, Cincinnati.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., Porter, L. W. (1979) The Measurement of Organizational Commitment // Journal of Vocational Behavior. Vol. 14, No. 2, p. 224-247. doi: 10.1016/0001-8791(79) 90072-1.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Nicklin, J. M., McNall, L. A., Cerasoli, C. P., Strahan, S. R., Cavanaugh, J. A. (2014). The Role of Overall Organizational Justice Perceptions Within the Four-Dimensional Framework. Social Justice Research. Vol. 27, p. 243-270. doi: 10.1007/s11211-014-0208-4.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Rupp, D. E., Cropanzano, R. (2002). The MediatingEffects of Social Exchange Relationships in Predicting Workplace Outcomes From Multifoci Organizational Justice // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Vol. 89, No. 1, p. 925-946. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00036-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Scott, D. (1980). The Causal Relationship Between Trust and The Assessed Value of Management by Objectives // Journal of Management. Vol. 6, No. 2, p. 157-173. doi: 10.1177/014920638000600205.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Shapiro, D. L. (2001). The Death of Justice Theory is Likely if Theorists Neglect the “Wheels” Already Invented and the Voices of The Injustice Victims // Journal of Vocational Behavior. Vol. 58, No. 2, p. 235-242. doi: 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1795.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Sheppard, B. H., Lewicki, R. J., Minton, J. W. (1992). Organizational Justice: the Search For Fairness in The Workplace. - New York: Lexington Books/Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Tremblay, M., Sire, B., Balkin, D. B. (2000). The Role of Organizational Justice in Pay and Employee Benefit Satisfaction, and its Effects on Work Attitudes // Group and Organization Management. Vol. 25, No. 3, p. 269-290. doi: 10.1177/1059601100253004.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., Lind, E. A. (1998). When do We Need Procedural Fairness? The Role of Trust in Authority // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 75, No. 6, p. 1449-1458.doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.75. 6.1449.]Search in Google Scholar
