Cite

Andrews, J. and Smith D.C. (1996), “In search of marketing imagination: Factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 174-187.10.1177/002224379603300205Search in Google Scholar

Baskin, E., Wakslak, C.J., Trope, Y and Novemsky, N. (2014), “Why feasibility matters more to gift receivers than to givers: A construal-level approach to gift giving”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 169-182.10.1086/675737Search in Google Scholar

Belk, R.W. (1979), “Gift-giving behavior”, in Sheth, J. (ed.) Research in Marketing, Vol. 2, pp. 95-126, JAI press, Greenwich, CT.Search in Google Scholar

Belk, R.W. and Coon, G.S. (1991), “Can't buy me love: Dating, money, and gifts”, ACR North American Advances.Search in Google Scholar

Buhrmester, M. Kwang, T. and Gosling, S.D. (2011), “Amazon’s mechanical turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?”, Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 3-5.10.1177/1745691610393980Search in Google Scholar

Caplow, T. (1982), “Christmas gifts and kin networks”, American Sociological Review, pp. 383-392.10.2307/2094994Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cobb, R. A., DeWall, C. N., Lambert, N. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2013), “Implicit theories of relationships and close relationship violence: does believing your relationship can grow relate to lower perpetration of violence?”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 279-290.10.1177/0146167212473159Search in Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2000), Self-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Psychology Press. Philadelphia, PA.Search in Google Scholar

Elliott, E. S. and Dweck, C.S. (1988), “Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 54 No.1, pp. 5-12. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Gino, F. and Flynn, F.J. (2011), “Give them what they want: The benefits of explicitness in gift exchange”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 47, No. 5, pp. 915-922. 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Goodman, J.K., Cryder, C. E. and Cheema, A. (2013), “Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples”, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 26, pp. 213-224.10.1002/bdm.1753Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998), Multivariate data analysis, Vol. 5, No. 3, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, A.F. (2013), Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, Guilford Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Hui, C.M., Bond, M.H. and Molden, D.C. (2012), “Why do (n’t) your partner’s efforts at selfimprovement make you happy? An implicit theories perspective”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 101-113.10.1177/0146167211420734Search in Google Scholar

Knee, C.R. (1998), “Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 360-370.10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.360Search in Google Scholar

Knee, C.R., Patrick, H. and Lonsbary, C. (2003), “Implicit theories of relationships: Orientations toward evaluation and cultivation”, Personality and Social Psychology Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 41-55.10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701_3Search in Google Scholar

Knee, C.R., Nanayakkara, A., Vietor, N.A., Neighbors, C. and Patrick, H., (2001), “Implicit theories of relationships: Who cares if romantic partners are less than ideal?”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 808-819.10.1177/0146167201277004Search in Google Scholar

Liu, W. (2008), “Focusing on desirability: The effect of decision interruption and suspension on preferences”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.35 No.4, pp. 640-652.10.1086/592126Search in Google Scholar

Mittal, B. (1994), “An Integrated framework for relating diverse consumer characteristics to supermarket coupon redemption”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 533-44.10.2307/3151881Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Nguyen, H.P. and Munch, J.M. (2011), “Romantic gift giving as chore or pleasure: The effects of attachment orientations on gift giving perceptions”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 113-118.10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.02.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Prendergast, C. and Stole L. (2001), “The non-monetary nature of gifts”, European Economic Review, Vol. 45, No. 10, pp. 1793-1810.10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00102-1Search in Google Scholar

Rai, D., Lin, C.W. and Ierlan, M.T. (2016), “The influence of scheduling style on assortment size”, Management and Marketing, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 553-565.10.1515/mmcks-2016-0016Search in Google Scholar

Research and Markets (2015), “Gifting report 2015”, available at: www.researchandmarkets.com/research/hq2wt4/gifting_report (accessed October, 6, 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Roscoe, J.T. (1975) Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd edition, Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Ruth, J.A., Brunel, F.F. and Otnes, C.C. (2004), “An investigation of the power of emotions in relationship realignment: The gift recipient's perspective”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 29-52.10.1002/mar.10114Search in Google Scholar

Sherry, J.F. (1983), “Gift giving in anthropological perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 157-168.10.1086/208956Search in Google Scholar

Trope, Y. and Liberman, N. (2010), “Construal-level theory of psychological distance”, Psychological Review, Vol. 117, No. 2, pp. 440-463.10.1037/a0018963Search in Google Scholar

Ward, M.K. and Broniarczyk, S.M. (2011), “It’s not me, it’s you: How gift giving creates giver identity threat as a function of social closeness”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 38, No.1, pp. 164-181.10.1086/658166Search in Google Scholar

Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G. and Chen, Q. (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 197-206.10.1086/651257Search in Google Scholar

Zuberman, G. and Lynch, J.G. (2005), “Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 134, No. 1, pp. 23-37.10.1037/0096-3445.134.1.23Search in Google Scholar