Natural capital as a factor in regional competitiveness

Bartmann, H 1996, Umweltökonomie – Ökologische Ökonomie, Verlag W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Borozan, D 2008, ‘Regional competitiveness: some conceptual issues and policy implications’ in Interdisciplinary management research IV, eds D Barkovic & B Runzhiemer, Faculty of Economics in Osijek, Osijek, pp.50–63.Search in Google Scholar

Camagni, R (2008), ‘Regional competitiveness: towards a concept of territorial capital’ in Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe. European Competiveness and Global Strategies, eds R Capello et al., Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, pp. 33-47.10.1007/978-3-540-74737-6_3Search in Google Scholar

Camagni, R & Capello, R (2013), ‘Regional competitiveness and territorial capital: a conceptual approach and empirical evidence from the European Union’, Regional Studies, Volume 47, Issue 9, pp. 1383-1402.10.1080/00343404.2012.681640Search in Google Scholar

Constantin, D-L 2006, ‘Recent advances in territorial competition and competitiveness analysis’, Romanian Journal of European Affairs, vol. 6, no. 3, pp.71–81.Search in Google Scholar

Costanza, R & Daly, H E 1992, ‘Natural capital and sustainable development’, Conservation Biology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp.37–46.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.xSearch in Google Scholar

Degórski, M 2010, ‘Socio-economic responses to the environment and ecosystem services in regional development’, Geographia Polonica, 83, 2, pp.83–95.10.7163/GPol.2010.2.6Search in Google Scholar

Ehrlich, P R & Wilson, E O 1991, ‘Biodiversity studies: science and policy’, Science, 253, pp.758–762.10.1126/science.253.5021.758Search in Google Scholar

Ekins, P, Simon, S, Deutsch, L, Folke C & De Groot, R 2003, ‘A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability’, Ecological Economics, 44, 2-3, pp.165–185.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00272-0Search in Google Scholar

GUS 2005, Ochrona Środowiska 2005, GUS, Warszawa.Search in Google Scholar

GUS 2013, Ochrona Środowiska 2013, GUS, Warszawa.Search in Google Scholar

Hellwig, Z 1968, ‘Zastosowanie metody taksonomicznej do typologicznego podziału krajów ze względu na poziom ich rozwoju oraz zasoby i strukturę wykwalifikowanych kadr’, Przegląd Statystyczny, no. 4, pp.307–326.Search in Google Scholar

Hydzik, P 2012, ‘Zastosowanie metod taksonomicznych do oceny poziomu rozwoju społeczno-ekonomicznego powiatów województwa podkarpackiego’, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, nr 286, z. 19 (2), pp. 17-32.10.7862/rz.2012.einh.9Search in Google Scholar

Jędrusik, M 2014, ‘The elusive sustainable development of small tropical islands’, Miscellanea Geographica – Regional Studies on Development, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 26–30. DOI: 10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0026.10.2478/mgrsd-2014-0026Search in Google Scholar

Kasztelan, A 2010, ‘Środowiskowa konkurencyjność regionów – próba konceptualizacji’, Problemy Ekorozwoju-Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 5, no. 2, pp.77–86.Search in Google Scholar

Kasztelan, A 2011, ‘Ocena środowiskowej konkurencyjności regionów w Polsce’, Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, no. 166, pp.258–268.Search in Google Scholar

Kasztelan, A 2013a, ‘A comparative analysis of the environmental competitiveness of Lubelskie and Zachodniopomorskie voivodships’, Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska-Annual Set The Environment Protection, vol. 15, pp.637–648.Search in Google Scholar

Kasztelan, A 2013b, ‘Regional development based on environmental competitive advantages – a comparative analysis of Polish voivodships’, Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp.105–122.10.2478/cer-2013-0014Search in Google Scholar

Kijek, A 2013, Ryzyko sektorowe przemysłu przetwórczego. Modelowanie i ocena. Wydawnictwo UMCS, Lublin.Search in Google Scholar

Kukuła, K 2000, Metoda unitaryzacji zerowanej, PWN, Warsaw.Search in Google Scholar

Łogwiniuk, K 2011, ‘Zastosowanie metod taksonomicznych w analizie porównawczej dostępu do infrastruktury ICT przez młodzież szkolną w Polsce’, Economy and Management, 1/2011, pp.7–23.Search in Google Scholar

Martin, R (2005), Thinking about regional competitiveness: critical issues, East Midlands Regional Development Agency, Nottingham.Search in Google Scholar

Madej, T 2002, ‘Funkcje pełnione przez środowisko przyrodnicze’ in Gospodarka a środowisko przyrodnicze, Wyd. Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Szczecin, pp.79–88.Search in Google Scholar

Malovics, G 2007, The role of natural capital in regional development, 2nd Central European Conference in Regional Science – CERS, Technical University of Košice, Košice, pp. 648–655.Search in Google Scholar

Michałowski, A 2012, ‘Ecosystem services in the light of a sustainable knowledge-based economy’, Problemy Ekorozwoju-Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 97–106.Search in Google Scholar

Pawłowski, A 2013, ‘Sustainable development and globalization’, Problemy Ekorozwoju- Problems of Sustainable Development, vol. 8 no. 2, pp. 5–16.Search in Google Scholar

Rucinska, S. & Rucinsky, R 2007, Factors of regional competitiveness, 2nd Central European Conference in Regional Science – CERS, Technical University of Košice, Košice, pp. 902–911.Search in Google Scholar

Sztumski, W 2009, ‘Mitologia rozwoju zrównoważonego’, Problemy Ekorozwoju – Problems of Sustainable Development, vol 4, no. 2, pp. 13–23.Search in Google Scholar

Wokoun, R, Damborský, M, Kouřilová, J & Krejčová, N 2012, The competitiveness of regions in the EU, ERSA conference papers, Available from: http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa12/e120821aFinal00790.pdf. [09.04.2015]Search in Google Scholar