Cite

1. Hádryová, J. (2011). Bakteriocín-produkujúce baktérie a ich využitie pre zdravie. Bacteriocin-producing bacteria and their use for health, in Slovak), Diploma thesis, University P. J. Šafárik, Faculty of Natural Science, Institute of Animal Physiology, (p.1-69).Search in Google Scholar

2. Lauková, A., Hádryová, J., Imrichová, J., Strompfová, J., Kandričáková, A. (2012). Characterization of bacteriocin-producing strain Enterococcus faecium EM41, isolate from ostrich and its bacteriocin. Proceedings of Hygiena Alimentorum XXXIII.-Safety and quality of poultry, fish and game products, 9.-11.5. 2011, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, pp. 327-4. ISBN 978-80-7148-063-1. PMCid:PMC3419009Search in Google Scholar

3. Kyung-Woo Lee, Duk Kyung Kim, Hyun S. Lillehoj, Seung I. Jang, Sung-Hyen Lee (2015). Immune modulation by Bacillus subtilis-based direct-fed microbials in commercial broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 200, 76-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.12.00610.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.12.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Novak, R., Gogovič Matijašič, M., Terčič, D., Červek, M., Gorjanc, G., Holcman, A., Levart, A., Rogelj, I. (2011). Effects of two probiotic additives containing Bacillus spores on carcass characteristics, blood lipids and cecal volatile fatty acids in meat type chickens. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 95, 424-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01068.x PMid:2103993110.1111/j.1439-0396.2010.01068.xPMid:21039931Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Ščerbová, J., Lauková, A. (2016). Sensitivity to enterocins of thermophilic Campylobacter sp. from different poultry species. Foodb. Path. Dis. 13, 668-673. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2016.2158 PMid:2760243410.1089/fpd.2016.2158PMid:27602434Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Fuller, R. (2004). What is probiotic. Biologist 51, 232.Search in Google Scholar

7. Murray, A.C., Jr. Hinton, A.Jr., Buhr, R.J. (2006). Effect of botanical probiotic containing lactobacilli on growth performance and population of bacteria in ceca, cloaca and carcass rinse in broiler chicken. Int. J. Polutry Sci. 5, 344-350. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.344.35010.3923/ijps.2006.344.350Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Audisio, M.C., Oliver, G Apella, M.C. (2000). Protective effect of Enterococcus faecium J96, a potential probiotic strain, on chicks infected with Salmonella pullorum. J. Food Prot. 63, 1333-13337. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-63.10.133310.4315/0362-028X-63.10.1333Search in Google Scholar

9. Lauková, A., Guba, P., Nemcová, R., Vasilková, Z. (2003). Reduction of Salmoenlla in gnotobiotic Japanese quails caused by the enterocin A-producing EK13 strain of Enterococcus faecium. Vet. Res. Com. 27, 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:102402792382410.1023/A:1024027923824Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Lauková, A., Chrastinová, Ľ., Pogány Simonová, M., Strompfová, V., Plachá, I., Čobanová, K., Formelová, Z., Chrenková, M., Ondruška, Ľ. (2012). Enterococcus faecium AL41:Its Enterocin M and their beneficial use in rabbits husbandry. Prob. Antimicrob. Prot. 4, 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-012-9118-7 PMid:2678218410.1007/s12602-012-9118-7Search in Google Scholar

11. Lauková, A., Chrastinová, Ľ., Kandričáková, A., Ščerbová, J., Plachá, I., Pogány Simonová, M., Čobanová, K., Formelová, Z., Ondruška, Ľ., Strompfová, V. (2015). Bacteriocin substance durancin-like ED26E/7 and its experimental use in broiler rabbits husbandry (in Slovak). Maso. 5, 56-59.Search in Google Scholar

12. Levkut, M., Revajová, V., Lauková, A., Ševčíková, Z., Spišáková, V., Faixová, Z., Levkutová, M., Strompfová, V., Pistl, J., Levkut, M. (2012). Leucocytic responses and intestinal mucin dynamics of broilers protected with Enterococcus faecium EF55 and challenged with Salmonella Enteritidis. Res. Vet. Sci. 93, 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2011.06.021 PMid:2176785610.1016/j.rvsc.2011.06.021PMid:21767856Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Lauková, A., Strompfová, V., Plachá, I., Čobanová, K., Faix, Š., Pogány Simonová, M. (2015). Beneficial effect of enterocin M-producing, probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium AL41 in model experiment with hens. Glob. J. Anim. Sci. Res. 31, 206-213. ISSN:2345-4377.Search in Google Scholar

14. Mareková, M., Lauková, A., De Vuyst, L., Skaugen, M., Nes, I.F. (2003). Partial characterization of bacteriocins produced by environmental strain Enterococcus faecium EK13. J. Appl. Microbiol. 94, 523-530. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01861.x PMid:1258856210.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01861.xPMid:12588562Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15 De Vuyst, L., Callewaert, R., Pot, B. (1996). Characterization of the antagonistic activity of Lactobacillus amylovorus DCE471 and large scale isolation of its bacteriocin amylovorin L471. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 19, 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(96)80003-810.1016/S0723-2020(96)80003-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Grešáková, Ľ., Boldižárová, K., Čekonová, S., Levkut, M., Leng, Ľ. (2003). Device for quantitative collection of chicken excrement in balance studies. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 12, 351-358. https://doi.org/10.22358/jafs/67714/200310.22358/jafs/67714/2003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Herich, R., Lauková, A., Strompfová, V., Revajová, V., Levkut, M. Pistl, J. (2004). Optimalization of Salmonella detection in chickens caecum using PCR method. Arch. Tierz. Dummerstorf. 47, 85-91.Search in Google Scholar

18. Woodford N., Egelton C.M., Morrison D. (1997) Comparison of PCR with Phenotypic Methods for the Speciation of Enterococci. In: Horaud T., Bouvet A., Leclercq R., de Montclos H., Sicard M. (eds) Streptococci and the Host. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 418. Springer, Boston, MA https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1825-3_9710.1007/978-1-4899-1825-3_97Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Vetvička, V., Fornousek, J., Kopeček, J., Kaminková, J., Kašpárek, L., Vránová, M. (1982). Phagocytosis of hyman blood leucocytes, a simple micro method. Immunol. Lett. 5, 97-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-2478(82)90040-210.1016/0165-2478(82)90040-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Paglia, D.E., Valentine, W.N. (1967). Studies on quantitative and qualitative characterization of erythocyte glutahione peroxidase. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 70, 158-169. PMid:6066618Search in Google Scholar

21. Devriese, L.A., Pot, B., Collins, M.D. (1993). Phylogenetic identificaton of the genus Enterococcus and differentiation of phylogenic distinct of enterococcal species and species groups. J. Appl. Microbiol. 75, 399-408.Search in Google Scholar

22. Pogány Simonová, M., Chrastinová, Ľ., Lauková, A., Strompfová, V., Faix, Š., Vasilková, Z., Ondruška, Ľ., Jurčík, R., Rafay, J. (2009). Enterococcus faecium CCM7420, bacteriocin PPB CCM 7420 and their use in the digestive tract of rabbits. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 54, 376-386.10.17221/1659-CJASSearch in Google Scholar

23. Strompfová, V., Lauková, A. (2007). In vitro study on bacteriocin of enterococci associated with chickens. Anaerobe 13, 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.07.002 PMid:1788462210.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.07.002PMid:17884622Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24. Karaffová, V., Marcinková, E., Bobíková, K., Herich, R., Revajová, V., Stašová, D., Kavuľová, A., Levkutová, M, Levkut M. Jr., Lauková, A., Ševčíková, Z., Levkut M. Sr. (2017). TLR4 and TLR21 expression, MIF, IFN-β, MID-2, CD14 activation, and IgA production in chickens administered with EFAL41 strain challenged with Campylobacter jejuni. Folia Microbiol. 62, (2) pp 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-016-0475-610.1007/s12223-016-0475-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25. Lauková, A., Guba, P., Nemcová, R., Mareková, M. (2004). Inhibition of Salmonella enterica serovar Duesseldorf by enterocin A in gnotobiotic Japanese quails. Vet. Med. Czech, 49, 47-51.10.17221/5674-VETMEDSearch in Google Scholar

26. Cigánková, V., Lauková, A., Guba, P., Nemcová, R. (2004). Effect of enterocin A on the intestinal epithelium of Japanese quails infected by Salmonella duesseldorf. Bull. Vet. Inst. 48, 25-27.Search in Google Scholar

27. Ševčíková, Z., Blanár, J., Lauková, A., Revajová, V., Strompfová, V., Levkut, M. (2016). Effect of Enterococcus faecium EF55 on morphometry and proliferative activity of intestinal mucosa in broilers infected with Salmonella Enteritidis. J. Vet. Res. 60, 261-265. https://doi.org/10.1515/jvetres-2016-004010.1515/jvetres-2016-0040Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. De Rodas, B., Z., Gilliland, S.E., Maxwell, C.V. (1996). Hypocholesterolemic action of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 and calcium in swine with hypocholesterolemia induced by diet. J. Dairy Sci. 79, 2121-2128. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76586-410.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76586-4Search in Google Scholar

29. Fukushima, M., Nakamo, M. (1995). The effect of probiotic on fecal and liver lipid classes in rats. British J. Nutr. 73, 701-710. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN1995007410.1079/BJN199500747626589Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Hlivák, P., Odraska, J., Ferenčík, M., Ebringer, L., Jahnová, E., Mikeš, Z. (2005). One-year application of probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium M74 decreases serum cholesterol levels. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 106, 67-72.Search in Google Scholar

32. Lauková, A., Pogány Simonová, M., Chrastinová, Ľ., Plachá, I., Čobanová, K., Formelová, Z., Chrenková, M., Ondruška, Ľ., Strompfová, V. (2016). Benefits of combinative application of probiotic, enterocin M-producing strain Enterococcus faecium AL41 and Eleutherococcus senticosus in rabbits. Folia Microbiol. 61, 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-015-0423-x PMid:2635479010.1007/s12223-015-0423-xPMid:26354790Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33. Pogány Simonová, M., Lauková, A., Plachá, I., Čobanová, K., Strompfová, V., Szabóová, R., Chrastinová, Ľ. (2013). Can enterocins affect phagocytosis and glutahione-peroxidase in rabbits? Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 8, 730-734.Search in Google Scholar

34. Shang, L., Fukata, M., Thirunarayanan, N., Martin, A.P., Arnaboldi, P., Maussang, D., Berin C, Unleless, J.C., Meyer, L., Abreu, M.T., Lira, S.A. (2008). TLR signaling in small intestinal epithelium promotes B cell recruitment and IgA production in lamina propria. In Gastroenterol. 135, 529-538. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.020 PMid:18522803 PMCid:PMC259877610.1053/j.gastro.2008.04.020PMid:18522803PMCid:PMC2598776Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

35. Mangiapane, E., Pessione, A., Pessione, E. (2014). Selenium and selenoproteins:an overview on different biological systems. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 15, 598-607. https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203715666140608151134 PMid:2491008610.2174/1389203715666140608151134PMid:24910086Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1857-7415
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, other, Medicine, Basic Medical Science, Veterinary Medicine