Pharmacokinetics of Doxycycline in Ducks with Steatosis due to Force-feeding

1. Pijpers, A., Van Klingeren, B., Schoevers, E.J., Verheijden, J.H.M., Van Miert, A.S. (1989). In vitro activity of five tetracyclines and some other antimicrobial agents four porcine respiratory tract pathogens. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 12, 267–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1989.tb00670.x PMid:281047510.1111/j.1365-2885.1989.tb00670.x2810475Search in Google Scholar

2. Anadón, A., Martínez-Larra-aga, M.R., Diaz, M.J., Bringas, P., Fernandez, M.C., Fernandez-Cruz, M.L., Iturbe, J., Martínez, M.A. (1994). Pharmacokinetics of doxycycline in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 23, 79-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079459408418976 PMid:1867107310.1080/0307945940841897618671073Search in Google Scholar

3. Poapolathep, A., Poapolathep, S., Imsilp, K., Noonpugdee, C., Klangkaew, N., Kusujarit, N., Tirawattanawanich, C., Subsinsoonthon, B. (2005). Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of doxycycline in Thai native chickens. J. Thai. Vet. Med. Assoc. 56, 59–65.Search in Google Scholar

4. Yang, F., Li, GH., Meng, X.B., Wang, L.Q., Huang, X.H., Shan, Q., Zeng, D.P., Ding, H.Z., Zeng, Z.L. (2012). Pharmacokinetic interactions of flunixin meglumine and doxycycline in broiler chickens. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 36, 85–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2012.01382.x PMid:2229291310.1111/j.1365-2885.2012.01382.x22292913Search in Google Scholar

5. Küng, K., Wanner, M. (1994). Pharmacokinetics of Doxycycline in turkeys and comparison between feed and water medication. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 58, 84–88.Search in Google Scholar

6. Santos, M.D., Vermeersch, H., Remon, J., Schelkens, M., Backer, P., Van Bree, H.J., Ducatelle, R., Haesebrouck, F. (1996). Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of doxycycline in turkeys J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 19, 274–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.1996.tb00049.x10.1111/j.1365-2885.1996.tb00049.x8866455Search in Google Scholar

7. Yang, F., Sun, N., Zhao, Z.S., Wang, G.Y., Wang, M.F. (2015). Pharmacokinetics of doxycycline after a single intravenous, oral or intramuscular dose in Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata). British Poultry Sci. 56, 137–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2014.989488 PMid:2541107710.1080/00071668.2014.98948825411077Search in Google Scholar

8. Dorrestein, G., Weling, J., Haagsma, N. (1990). Pharmacokinetic differences for doxycycline between racing pigeon (Columba livia) and collared doves (Streptopelis decaocto) and the effect of a salmonella infection. In VII. Tagung der Fachgroupe „Geflugelkrankheiten“ (pp. 132–143), In Verbindung dem Institut für Geflugelkrankheiten der Ludvig-Maximilians-Universitet, München, Germany,Search in Google Scholar

9. Bernard, P.G., Bengone, T, Prehn, D., Durand, S., Labie, C., Benard, P. (2006). Physiology of ducks during force-feeding: study of hepatic steatosis. Bulletin de l‘Academie Vétérinaire de France 159, 43–54.Search in Google Scholar

10. Bogin, E., Avidar, Y., Merom, M., Israeli, B., Malkinson, M., Sobak, S., Kudler, Y. (1984). Biochemical changes associated whit fatty liver in geese. Avian Pathol. 13, 683-901. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03079458408418566 PMid:1876687910.1080/0307945840841856618766879Search in Google Scholar

11. Awde, S., Marty-Gasset, N., Wilkesman, J., Remingnon, H. (2013). Proteolytic activity alterations resulting from force-feeding in Muscovy and Pekin ducks. Poultry Sci. 92, 2997-3002. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03195 PMid:2413560410.3382/ps.2013-0319524135604Search in Google Scholar

12. Bratoev, N., Lashev, L. (2014). Pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin in ducks with steatosis after force-feeding. VII-conference of the Bulgarian focal center of EFSA, October 2014, Sofia, Bugaria.Search in Google Scholar

13. Baert, K., Croubels, S., Gasthuys, F., De Busser, J., De Backer, P. (2001). Pharmacokinetics and oral bioavailability of a doxycycline formulation (DOXYCYCLINE 75%) in nonfasted young pigs. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Ther. 23, 45-48.10.1046/j.1365-2885.2000.00235.x10747242Search in Google Scholar

14. El-Gendi, A.Y.I., Aziza, M.A., Amer, M.M., Kamel, G.M. (2010). Pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution of doxycycline in broiler chickens pre-treated with either: Diclazuril or Halofuginone. Food and Chem. Toxicol. 48, 3209–3214. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.08.024 PMid:2073604210.1016/j.fct.2010.08.02420736042Search in Google Scholar

15. Yang, F., Si, H,B., Wang, Z.S., Zhao, B. H., Zhou, B. H., Hao, X. Q. (2016). Pharmackinetics of doxycycline in laying hens after intravenous and oral administration. Britsh poultry sci. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1184228 PMid:2713790010.1080/00071668.2016.118422827137900Search in Google Scholar

16. Bengone-Ndong, T., Benard, G., Prehn, D., Colas, E., Grimm, F., Benard, P. (1996). Etude de la cinetique de la bromosulfonephthaleine et du vert d‘indocyanine chez le canard: determination de la linearite. Revue. Méd. Vét. 147, 75-80.Search in Google Scholar

17. Slana, M., Pahor, V., Cvitkovič Maričič, L, Sollner-Dolenc, M. (2014). Excretion pattern of enrofloxacin after oral treatment of chicken broilers. 37, 611-614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvp.1213010.1111/jvp.1213024731224Search in Google Scholar

18. Buechler, C, Weiss, T.S. (2011). Does hepatic steatosis affect drug metabolizing enzymes in the liver? Curr. Drug Metab. 12, 24-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/13892001179452003510.2174/13892001179452003521222589Search in Google Scholar

19. Liu, Y., Ramamurthy, N., Marecek, J., Lee, H.M., Chen, J.L., Ryan, M.E., Rifkin, B.R., Golub, L.M. (2001). The lipophilicity, pharmacokinetics, and cellular uptake of different chemically-modified tetracyclines (CMTs). Curr. Med. Chem. 8, 243-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/0929867013373525 PMid:1117267810.2174/092986701337352511172678Search in Google Scholar

20. Mckellar, Q., Sanchez Bruni, A. S. F., Jones, D. G. (2004) Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of antimicrobial drugs used in veterinary medicine. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 27, 503–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00603.x PMid:1560144410.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00603.x15601444Search in Google Scholar