Identity of Innovative Multifunctional Material Manufacturing Business in Latvia / Inovatīvu Daudzfunkcionālo Materiālu Ražotāju Identitāte Latvijā

1. Jansons, J., Knite, M., and Šternbergs, A. (2007). Materiālzinātne: nanotehnoloģijas modernu funkcionālo materiālu iegūšanai, jaunas paaudzes kompozītmateriāli. In Zinātne, pētniecība un inovācija Latvijas izaugsmei, 37, 92-98.Search in Google Scholar

2. Staube, T., Ciemleja, G., and Geipele, I. (2014a). The origins of nanotechnology in Latvia. In Advanced Materials Research, 1025-1026, 1083-1087. http:// doi.org/10.4028/ www.scientific.net/AMR.1025-1026.1083. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1025-1026.1083Search in Google Scholar

3. Informatīvais ziņojums „Par viedās izaugsmes stratēģijas izstrādi un specializācijas noteikšanu”, 1.pielikums „Zināšanu kapacitātes novērtējums”. (2013). Ministry of Education and Science, Latvia.Search in Google Scholar

4. Par prioritārajiem virzieniem zinātnē 2014.-2017.gadā [Priority Branches of Science for the Period 2014-2017]. The Cabinet Regulation No.551. (2013). Retrieved 15 May 2015, from http://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=262091 Search in Google Scholar

5. Geipele, I., Staube, T., Ciemleja, G., Ekmanis, J., and Zeltins, N. (2014). Nanotechnologies in Latvia: Commercialisation Aspect. Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 51(5), 40-55. http://doi.org/10.2478/lpts-2014-0029. 10.2478/lpts-2014-0029Search in Google Scholar

6. Staube, T., Ciemleja, G., and Geipele, I. (2014b). Nanoscience: the scale of Latvia. Advanced Materials Research, 1004-1005, 28-31. http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific. net/AMR.1004-1005.28.Search in Google Scholar

7. Michna, J., Ekmanis, J., Zeltins, N., Zebergs, V., and Siemianowicz, J. (2012). Energijas racionālas izmantošanas inovatīva riska vadība (2. daļa). Latvian Journal of Physics and Technical Sciences, 49(1), 3-15. http://doi.org/10.2478/v10047-012-0001-9. 10.2478/v10047-012-0001-9Search in Google Scholar

8. Stark, D. (2007). Nanotechnology in Europe - ensuring the EU competes effectively on the world stage. Survey & Workshop Organised by Nanoforum in Düsseldorf, Germany. European Nanotechnology Trade Alliance. Retrieved 26 October 2014, from http://www.euractiv.com. Search in Google Scholar

9. 2005 NCMS Survey of Nanotechnology in the U.S. Manufacturing Industry. (2006). Retrieved 16 November 2014, from http://www.nsf.org. Search in Google Scholar

10. OECD. (2014). Considerations in moving towards a statistical framework for nanotechnology: findings from a working party on nanotechnology pilot survey of business activity in nanotechnology.Search in Google Scholar

11. Engeman, C. D., Baumgartner, L., Carr, B. M., Fish, A. M., Meyerhofer, J. D., Satterfield, T. A., Holden, P. A., and Harthorn, B. H. (2013). The hierarchy of environmental health and safety practices in the U.S. nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 10(9), 487-95. http://doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2013.818231. 10.1080/15459624.2013.81823123927041Search in Google Scholar

12. 2009 NCMS Study of Nanotechnology in the U.S. Manufacturing Industry. (2010).Search in Google Scholar

13. MASOC [Association of Mechanical Engineering and Metalworking Industries of Latvia]. (n.d.). Retrieved 25 November 2014, from http://www.masoc.lv/masoc/. Search in Google Scholar

14. Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (n.d.). Retrieved 18 May 2015, from http://www.csb.gov.lv/en. Search in Google Scholar

15. LURSOFT. Lursoft - data bases of enterprises. Lursoft. Retrieved 18 May 2015, from https://www.lursoft.lv/?l=en. Search in Google Scholar

16. Ozols, N. (2014). Darba tirgus prognozes viedās specializācijas jomās [Forecasts for Smart Specialisation in Labour Market of Latvia until 2020]. Diskusija „Augstākās izglītības politikas instrumentu izvēle un iekļaušana ES struktūrfondu 2014.-2020. gada plānošanas periodā”. Retrieved 10 April 2015, from http://viaa.gov.lv/files/news/24112/darba_tirgus_prognozes.pdf. Search in Google Scholar