[Bailer-Jones, D., 2003, When Models Represent. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17, 59–74.10.1080/02698590305238]Search in Google Scholar
[Bailer-Jones, D., 2009, Scientific Models in Philosophy of Science. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.10.2307/j.ctt5vkdnq]Search in Google Scholar
[Born, M., 1949, Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance. Oxford, Clarendon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fine, A., 1993, Fictionalism Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XVIII, 1–18.10.1111/j.1475-4975.1993.tb00254.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Giere, R., 2004, How Models are used to represent Reality. Philosophy of Science, 71, 742–752.10.1086/425063]Search in Google Scholar
[Giere, R., 2008, Why Models should not be regarded as Works of Fiction. In M. Suárez (ed.): Fiction in Science, London, Routledge, 2009, 248–258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Godfrey-Smith, P., 2006, The strategy of model-based science. Biology and Philosophy, 21, 725–740.10.1007/s10539-006-9054-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Godfrey-Smith, P., 2009, Models and Fictions in Science. Philosophical Studies, 143, 101–116.10.1007/s11098-008-9313-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Frigg, R., 2010, Fiction and Scientific Representation. In Roman Frigg and Matthew Hunter (eds.): Beyond Mimesis and Nominalism: Representation in Art and Science, Berlin/New York, Springer 2010, 97–138.10.1007/978-90-481-3851-7_6]Search in Google Scholar
[Frigg. R., S. Bradley, H. Du and Leonard A. Smith, 2014, Laplace’s Demon and the Adventures of His Apprentices. Philosophy of Science, 81(1), 31–59.10.1086/674416]Search in Google Scholar
[Heilbron, J. L., 1981, Historical Studies in the Theory of Atomic Structure. New York, Arno Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Norton, J., 1996, Are Thought Experiments Just What You Thought? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 26, 333–366.10.1080/00455091.1996.10717457]Search in Google Scholar
[Pais, A., 1986, Inward Bound. Oxford, Clarendon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rutherford, E., 1911, The Scattering of a and b Particles by Matter and the Structure of the Atom. Philosophical Magazine, XXI, 669–88.10.1080/14786440508637080]Search in Google Scholar
[Suárez, M., 2003, Scientific Representation: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17(3), 225–244.10.1080/0269859032000169442]Search in Google Scholar
[Suárez, M., 2004, An inferential conception of scientific representation. Philosophy of Science, 71, 767–779.10.1086/421415]Search in Google Scholar
[Suárez, M., 2010, Scientific Representation. Philosophy Compass, 5(1), 91–101.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00261.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinert, F., 1999, Theories, Models and Constraints. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30/2, 303–33310.1016/S0039-3681(98)00051-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinert, F., 2000, The Construction of Atom Models: Eliminative Inductivism and its Relation to Falsificationism. Foundations of Science, 5, 491–53110.1023/A:1011315710119]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinert, F., 2006, Einstein and the Representation of Reality. Facta Philosophica, 8, 229–5210.3726/93522_229]Search in Google Scholar
[Weinert, F., 2016, The Demons of Science. What they tell us and do not tells us about our world. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.]Search in Google Scholar