Open Access

Expressions of Relational Power in Nato Discourse: Cooperation with Former Adversaries


Cite

[1] David Yost, NATO Transformed. The Alliance’s New Roles in International Security, Washington, D.C.: United States Institution of Peace Press, 1998, p. 91.Search in Google Scholar

[2] The Future Tasks of the Alliance, Report of the Council, annex to the Final Communiqué of the Ministerial Meeting, December 13-14, 1967, in Texts of Final Communiqués, p. 200.Search in Google Scholar

[3] North Atlantic Council, London Declaration on a Transformed North Atlantic Alliance, July 6, 1990, para. 8.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Ibid., para 6.Search in Google Scholar

[5] 1991 Strategic Concept, para. 16.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ibid., para 19.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Ibid., para 21.Search in Google Scholar

[8] North Atlantic Council Communiqué, December 10, 1996, para. 4.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Madeleine Albright, Enlarging NATO, The Economist, February 15, 1997, p. 22.Search in Google Scholar

[10] NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the Russian Federation, 1997, pp. 2-3.Search in Google Scholar

[11] North Atlantic Council, Rome Declaration on Peace and Cooperation, November 8, 1991, para. 11.Search in Google Scholar

[12]North Atlantic Cooperation Council, Statement on Dialogue, Partnership and Cooperation, December 20, 1991, para. 4.Search in Google Scholar

[13] North Atlantic Council, The Brussels Summit Declaration, January 11, 1994, para. 13.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ibid.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Ibid., para. 19.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Ibid.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Washington Treaty, Art. 4.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Nick Williams, Partnership for Peace: Permanent Fixture or Declining Asset?, Survival 38 (Spring 1996), pp. 103-104.10.1080/00396339608442833Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2451-3113
ISSN:
1843-6722
Language:
English