[[1] Signed on 14 June 1985 in Schengen, Luxembourg.Its full implementation starts from July 1995 with the abolition of border controls between six of the signatory countries. Later on, it covers other European countries, including not members of EU.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Pakes, Fr. Comparative Criminal Justice, Devon, Willan Publishing, 2004, pp. 141-168.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Салкова, Е. Прекратяване на наказателното производство, С. Фенея, 2007, с. 93.]Search in Google Scholar
[[4]Chankova, D. Combating Trafficking in Human Beings in Bulgaria: Achievements, Problems, Perspectives,Victimological Advances in Theory, Policy and Services, ed. by Tod Tollefson, 2015, pp. 27-37.]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Stanin, M. Rights within Obligations and Responsibilities,in: scientific collection “Economic, social and administrative approachesto the knowledge-based organization”, Volume II, Land Forces Academy ”Nicolae Balchesku", Sibiu, Romania, 2016, p.150.10.1515/kbo-2016-0064]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] OJ L 239, 22.9.2000, рp.19-62.10.1016/S0010-7824(00)00131-1]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] See ECJ decision of 16 November 2010, C-261/09, Gaetano Mantello; ECJ decision of 22 December 2008, C-491/07, Vladimir Turanský; ECJ decision of 28 September 2006, C-467/04, Giuseppe Francesco Gasparini and Others.]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] The principle of mutual recognition of judgments was adopted by the Tampere European Council in October 1999 as a part of measures to improve the cooperation between MemberStates in the field of criminal justice.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Suominen, A. The principle of mutual recognition in cooperation in criminal matters. Astudy of the principle in four framework decisions and in the implementation legislation in the Nordic Member States. Bergen, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Signed on 13.12.2007in Lisbon, entered into force on 01.12.2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Белова-Ганева, Г. По вопросу о верховенстве европейского права, Научный вестникДипломатической академии, Выпуск 18, Украины, Киев, 2012, с. 115-119.]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Марин, Н. Юрисдикция на Съда на Европейския съюз в пространството на свобода, сигурност и правосъдие, УИ „Н. Рилски“, Благоевград, 2011 г., с.168-169.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Savona, E. Trends and Causes of Cross-Border (Organized) Crime in Europe, in: Criminal Justice Co-operation in the European Union after Tampere, Series of publications by the Academy of European Law in Trier /ERA/, Vol. 33, 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Fischer, Juliette. Comments on the Green Paper on Conflicts of Jurisdiction and the principle of Ne bis in idem in criminal proceedings, The Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law, 2006, р.5.]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Signed in Brusselson 30.11.2009, OJ L 328, 15.12.2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Bassiouni, M.Cherif. IntroductiontoInternationalCriminal Law, Secondrevisededition, Leiden;Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013, pp. 510-512.]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Signed in Strasbourg on 05.15.1972]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Peers, Steve. “The proposed Framework Decision on conflict of jurisdiction incriminal proceedings:Manipulating the right to a fair trial?”,in:Statewatch Analysis, 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Established by Council Decision 2002/187/JHA of 28 February 2002, with a view to reinforcing the fight against serious crime, OJ L 63, 06.03.2002; amended by EU Council Decision 2009/426/JHA on Strengthening Eurojust of 16 December 2008, OJ L 138 of 04.06.2009.]Search in Google Scholar
