Ejaculate traits and sperm morphology depending on ejaculate volume in Duroc boars

1. Blom E.: Studies on seminal vesiculitis in the bull: II. Proposal for a new classification of the spermiogram, Med Weter 1981, 37, 239–242.Search in Google Scholar

2. Deka D., Goswami R.N., Mili D.C., Nath D.R.: Effect of age of the sow and boar on reproduction performance. Indian Vet J 2002, 79, 615–616.Search in Google Scholar

3. Fitzpatrick J.L., Lüpold S.: Sexual selection and the evolution of sperm quality. Mol Hum Reprod 2014, 20, 1180–1189.10.1093/molehr/gau06725323970Search in Google Scholar

4. Gil M.C., García-Herreros M., Barón F.J., Aparicio I.M., Santos A.J., García-Marín L.J.: Morphometry of porcine spermatozoa and its functional significance in relation with the motility parameters in fresh semen. Theriogenology 2009, 71, 254–263.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.07.00718760833Search in Google Scholar

5. Górski K., Kondracki S., Wysokińska A., Nazaruk A.: The importance of ejaculate volume for the physical parameters of ejaculates and sperm morphology of Hypor boars. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2016, 22, 493–501.Search in Google Scholar

6. Helfenstein F., Podevin M., Richner H.: Sperm morphology, swimming velocity, and longevity in the house sparrow Passer domesticus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2010, 64, 557–565.10.1007/s00265-009-0871-xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Hirai M., Boersma A., Hoeflich A., Wolf E., Föll J., Aumüller R., Braun A.J.: Objectively measured sperm motility and sperm head morphometry in boars (Sus scrofa): Relation to fertility and seminal plasma growth factors. J Androl 2001, 22, 104–110.Search in Google Scholar

8. Humphries S., Evans J.P., Simmons L.W.: Sperm competition: linking form and function. BMC Evol Biol 2008, 8, 319–329.10.1186/1471-2148-8-319263267619032741Search in Google Scholar

9. King G.J., Macpherson J.W.: A comparison of two methods for boar semen collection. J Anim Sci 1973, 36, 563–565.10.2527/jas1973.363563x4693863Search in Google Scholar

10. Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Bajena M., Komorowska K., Kowalewski D.: Correlation of frequency of spermatozoa morphological alterations with sperm concentration in ejaculates of Polish Landrace boars. Acta Vet Beograd 2013, 63, 513–524.10.2298/AVB1306513KSearch in Google Scholar

11. Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Mielnicka C.: The effect of age on the morphometric sperm traits of domestic pigs. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2005, 10, 3–13.Search in Google Scholar

12. Kondracki S., Banaszewska D., Wysokińska A., Sadowska A.: Ejaculate traits and spermatozoa morphology as related to spermatozoa concentration in ejaculates of Polish Large White boars. Anim Sci Pap Rep 2006, 24, 111–119.Search in Google Scholar

13. Kondracki S., Górski K., Wysokińska A., Jóźwik I.: Correlation of ejaculate parameters and sperm morphology with the ejaculate volume of Pietrain boars. Bulg J Agric Sci 2014, 20, 721–727.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kondracki S., Iwanina M., Wysokińska A., Górski K.: The use of sexual activity measurements to assess ejaculatory performance of boars. Arch Tierzucht 2013, 56, 1052–1059.10.7482/0003-9438-56-106Search in Google Scholar

15. Kondracki S., Wysokińska A., Iwanina M., Banaszewska D., Sitarz D.: Effect of sperm concentration in an ejaculate on morphometric traits of spermatozoa in Duroc boars. Pol J Vet Sci 2011, 14, 35–40.10.2478/v10181-011-0005-z21528709Search in Google Scholar

16. Kowalewski D., Kondracki S., Górski K., Bajena M., Wysokińska A.: Effect of piggery microclimate on ejaculate performance of artificial insemination boars. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2016, 22, 225–232.Search in Google Scholar

17. Łącka K., Kondracki S., Iwanina M., Wysokińska A.: Assessment of stallion semen morphology using two different staining methods, microscopic techniques, and sample sizes. J Vet Res 2016, 60, 99–104.10.1515/jvetres-2016-0014Search in Google Scholar

18. Malo A.F., Gomendio M., Garde J., Lang-Lenton B., Soler A.J., Roldan E.R.S.: Sperm design and function. Biol Lett 2006, 22, 246–249.10.1098/rsbl.2006.0449161891717148374Search in Google Scholar

19. Maroto-Morales A., Ramon M., Garcia-Alvarez O., Soler A.J., Esteso M.C., Martinez-Pastor F., Perez-Guzman M.D., Garde J.J.: Characterization of ram (Ovis aries) sperm head morphometry using the Sperm-Class Analyzer. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 437–448.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.10.003Search in Google Scholar

20. Noorafshan A., Karbalay-Doust S.: A simple method for unbiased estimating of ejaculated sperm tail length in subject with normal and abnormal sperm motility. Micron 2010, 41, 95–99.10.1016/j.micron.2009.09.002Search in Google Scholar

21. Ordinance of the Polish Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development. Journal of Laws, No. 56, item 344, 15 February 2010. www.isap.sejm.gov.pl, Accessed: 08.04.2010.Search in Google Scholar

22. Park C.S., Yi Y.J.: Comparison of semen characteristics, sperm freezability and testosterone concentration between Duroc and Yorkshire boars during seasons. Anim Reprod Sci 2002, 73, 53–61.10.1016/S0378-4320(02)00129-XSearch in Google Scholar

23. Saravia F., Nunez-Martinez I., Moran J.M., Soler C., Muriel A., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Pena F.J.: Differences in boar sperm head shape and dimensions recorded by computer-assisted sperm morphometry are not related to chromatin integrity. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 196–203.10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.052Search in Google Scholar

24. Severa L., Machal L., Svabova L., Mamica O.: Evaluation of shape variability of stallion sperm heads by means of image analysis and Fourier descriptors. Anim Reprod Sci 2010, 119, 50–55.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.12.007Search in Google Scholar

25. Smital J., De Sousa L.L., Mohsen A.: Differences among breeds and manifestation of heterosis in AI boar sperm output. Anim Reprod Sci 2004, 80, 121–130.10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00142-8Search in Google Scholar

26. Smital J., Wolf J., De Sousa L.L.: Estimation of genetic parameters of semen characteristics and reproductive traits in AI boars. Anim Reprod Sci 2005, 86, 119–130.10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.02315721663Search in Google Scholar

27. Thurston L.M., Watson P.F., Mileham A.J., Holt W.V.: Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier Shape Descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation. J Androl 2001, 22, 382–394.Search in Google Scholar

28. Waberski D., Magnus F., Ardon F., Petrunkina A.M., Weitzke K.F., Töpfer-Petersen E.: Binding of boar spermatozoa to oviductal epithelium in vitro in relation to sperm morphology and storage time. Reproduction 2006, 131, 311–318.10.1530/rep.1.0081416452724Search in Google Scholar

29. Wolf J.: Genetic parameters for semen traits in AI boars estimated from data on individual ejaculates. Reprod Domest Anim 2009, 44, 338–344.10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01083.x19323799Search in Google Scholar

30. Wysokińska A., Kondracki S.: Assessment of sexual activity levels and their association with ejaculate parameters in two-breed hybrids and purebred Duroc and Pietrain boars. Ann Anim Sci 2014, 14, 559–571.10.2478/aoas-2014-0030Search in Google Scholar