Open Access

Computational psycholinguistic analysis and its application in psychological assessment of college students

Journal of Pedagogy's Cover Image
Journal of Pedagogy
Special Issue Title: Trends in Cognitive Education

Cite

Aaronson, D., & Rieber, R. W. (2013). Psycholinguistic research: Implications and applications. Hove: Psychology Press. pp. IX-X.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, J.L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Campbell, R.S., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2003). The secret life of pronouns: Flexibility in writing style and physical health. Psychological Science, 14(1), 60-65.10.1111/1467-9280.01419Search in Google Scholar

Cegala, D. (1989). A study of selected linguistic components of involvement in interaction. West. J. Speech Communication, 53(3), 311-326.10.1080/10570318909374309Search in Google Scholar

Cloninger, C.R. (2008). The Psychobiological theory of temperament and character: Comment on Farmer and Goldberg. Psychological Assessment, 20(3), 292-299.10.1037/a0012933Search in Google Scholar

Figurová, L.T. (2007). Sociální desirabilita (Master’s Thesis). Masarykova univerzita, Filozofická fakulta. Available from http://is.muni.cz/th/75552/ff_m Freud, S. (1901). Psychopathology of everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Furnham, A. (1990). Language and personality. In H. Giles, & W.H. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp 73-95), New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Garside, R., & Smith, N. (1997). A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In R. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora (pp.102-121). Longman, London.Search in Google Scholar

Hajič, J. (2004). Disambiguation of rich inflection (Comput. Morphology of Czech). Prague: Karolinum.Search in Google Scholar

Hamilton, R.V. (1957). A Psycholinguistic analysis of some interpretive processes of three basic personality types. The Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 153-177.10.1080/00224545.1957.9714317Search in Google Scholar

Hornová, L. (2003). Referenční slovník gramatických termínů. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, K.H.C. (2011). Further linguistic markers of personality: The way we say things matters. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 3(1), 2-16. 10.5539/ijps.v3n1p2Search in Google Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An Introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Mehl, M.R. (2006). Quantitative text analysis. In M. Eid, & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 141-156). Washington: American Psychological Association.Search in Google Scholar

Müllner, J., Ruisel, I., & Farkaš, G. (1980). Príručka pre administráciu, interpretáciu a vyhodnocovanie dotazníka na meranie úzkosti a úzkostlivosti. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostické a didaktické testy.Search in Google Scholar

Nebeská, I. (1992). Úvod do psycholingvistiky. Praha: H&H.Search in Google Scholar

Oxman, T. E., Rosenberg, S. D., Schnurr, P. P., & Tucker, G. J. (1988). Diagnostic classification through content analysis of patients‘ speech. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145(4), 464-468.10.1176/ajp.145.4.464Search in Google Scholar

Paulhus, D.L. (1988). Assessing self-deception and impression management in self- -reports: The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. Unpublished manual, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Search in Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J.W., & Graybeal, A. (2001). Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions, 10 (3), 90-93.10.1111/1467-8721.00123Search in Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J.W., & Davis, M. (2006). Pronoun use and dominance. Unpublished data. Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.Search in Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J.W., & King, L.A. (1999). Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1296-1312.10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296Search in Google Scholar

Pennebaker, J.W., Mehl, M.R., & Niederhoffer, K. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 547-577.10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041Search in Google Scholar

Petkevič, V. (2006). Reliable morphological disambiguation of Czech: Rule-Based approach is necessary. In M. Šimková (Ed.), Insight into the Slovak and Czech Corpus Linguistics (pp. 26-44), Bratislava: Veda.Search in Google Scholar

Preiss, M., Novák, T., Klose, J., Šamánková, D., Březinová, K., & Štěpánková, H. (2006). Ovlivňování výsledku vyšetření osobnosti: Výsledky dotazníku temperamentu a charakteru. Československá psychologie, 50(3), 251-261.Search in Google Scholar

Rude, S.S., Gortner, E.M., & Pennebaker, J.W. (2004). Language use of depressed and depression - vulnerable college students. Cognition and Emotion, 18(8), 1121-1133.10.1080/02699930441000030Search in Google Scholar

Sanford, F.H. (1942). Speech and personality. Psychological Bulletin, 39(10), 811-845.10.1037/h0060838Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, G., & Markoff, J. (1997). A Matter of definition. In C. W. Roberts (Ed.), Text analysis for the social sciences: Methods for drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.Search in Google Scholar

Scherer, K. R., & Giles, H. (1979). Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schnurr, P.P., Rosenberg, S.D., Oxman, T.E., & Tucker, G.J. (1986). A methodological note on content analysis: Estimates of reliability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 5(4), 601-609.10.1207/s15327752jpa5004_7Search in Google Scholar

Spielberger, C.D., Gorsuch, R.L., & Lushene, R.E. (1970). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologist Press.Search in Google Scholar

Spoustová, D. (2008). Combining statistical and rule-based approaches to morphological tagging of Czech texts. In: Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, 89, 23-40. 10.2478/v10108-009-0002-xSearch in Google Scholar

Taylor, M.A., Reed, R., & Berenbaum, S. (1994). Patterns of speech disorders in schizophrenia and mania. Journal of Nerv. and Mental Disease, 182(6), 319-326.10.1097/00005053-199406000-00002Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, C.B., & Duszynski, K.R. (1985). Are words of the ROR predictors of disease and death? The case of “whirling.” Psychosomatic Medicine, 47, 201-211.10.1097/00006842-198503000-00012Search in Google Scholar

Votrubec, J. (2006). Morphological tagging based on averaged perceptron. Praha: WDS’06 Proceedings of Contributed Papers, pp. 191-195.Search in Google Scholar

Weintraub, W. (1989). Verbal behavior in everyday life. New York: SpringerSearch in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1338-2144
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Social Sciences, Education, other