[Al Baghal, T. (ed.). 2014. “Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 6: Results from Methodological Experiments.” Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2014-04. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understanding-society/2014-04.pdf (accessed 24 February 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Al Baghal, T. (ed.). 2015. “Wave 7: Results from Methodological Experiments.” Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2015-03. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understanding-society/2015-03.pdf (accessed 24 February 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethlehem, J., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. New Jersey: Wiley.10.1002/9780470891056]Search in Google Scholar
[Burton, J. (ed.). 2013. “Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 5: Results from Methodological Experiments.” Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-06. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understanding-society/2013-06.pdf (accessed 24 February 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Calinescu, M. and B. Schouten. 2015. “Adaptive Survey Designs to Minimize Survey Mode Effects – a Case Study on the Dutch Labor Force Survey.” Survey Methodology 41(2): 403–425.]Search in Google Scholar
[Durrant, G., R.M. Groves, L. Staetsky, and F. Steele. 2010. “Effects of Interviewer Attitudes and Behaviors on Refusal in Household Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(1) : 1–36. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp098.10.1093/poq/nfp098]Search in Google Scholar
[Durrant, G.B., O. Maslovskaya, and P. Smith. 2015. “Modelling Final Outcome and Length of Call Sequence to Improve Efficiency in Interviewer Call Scheduling.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 3: 397–424. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smv008.10.1093/jssam/smv008]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.10.1002/0471725277]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M., J.M. Brick, W. Kalsbeek, B. Harris-Kojetin, F. Kreuter, B.-E. Pennell, T. Raghunathan, B. Schouten, T. Smith, R. Tourangeau, A. Bowers, M. Jans, C. Kennedy, R. Levenstein, K. Olson, E. Peytcheva, S. Ziniel, and J. Wagner. 2008. “Issues Facing the Field: Alternative Practical Measures of Representativeness of Survey Respondent Pools.” Survey Practice 1(3): 1–6.10.29115/SP-2008-0013]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781118490082]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 169: 439–457.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Groves, R.M. and E. Peytcheva. 2008. “The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 167–189. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011.10.1093/poq/nfn011]Search in Google Scholar
[Jäckle, A., P. Lynn, and J. Burton. 2015. “Going Online with a Face-to-Face Household Panel: Effects of a Mixed Mode Design on Item and Unit Nonresponse.” Survey Research Methods 9(1): 57–70. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i1.5475.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kanuk, L. and C. Berenson. 1975. “Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review.” Journal of Marketing Research 12: 440–453.10.1177/002224377501200408]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplowitz, M.D., T.D. Hadlock, and R. Levine. 2004. “A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 94–101.10.1093/poq/nfh006]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplowitz, M.D., F. Lupi, M.P. Couper, and L. Thorp. 2012. “The Effect of Invitation Design on Web Survey Response Rates.” Social Science Computer Review 30(3): 339–349. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439311419084.10.1177/0894439311419084]Search in Google Scholar
[Kish, L. 1965. Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lundquist, P. and C.-E. Särndal. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Design with Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29(4): 557–582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040.10.2478/jos-2013-0040]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, P. 2014. “Targeted Response Inducement Strategies on Longitudinal Surveys.” In Improving Survey Methods: Lessons from Recent Research, edited by U. Engel, B. Jann, P. Lynn, A. Scherpenzeel, and P. Sturgis, pp. 322–338. Abingdon UK: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, P. 2017. “From Standardised to Targeted Survey Procedures for Tackling Non-Response and Attrition.” Survey Research Methods 11(1): 93–103. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2017.v11i1.6734.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lynn, P. and A. Jäckle. in press. “Mounting Multiple Experiments on Longitudinal Social Surveys: Design and Implementation Considerations.” In Experimental Methods in Survey Research: Techniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment, edited by P.J. Lavrakas, M.W. Traugott, C. Kennedy, A.L. Holbrook, E.D. De Leeuw, and B.T. West. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.-E. 2011. “The 2010 Morris Hansen Lecture: Dealing with Survey Nonresponse in Data Collection, in Estimation.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(1): 1–21.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., J. Bethlehem, K. Beullens, O. Kleven, G. Loosveldt, A. Luiten, K. Rutar, N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2012. “Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring, and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response Through R-Indicators and Partial RIndicators.” International Statistical Review 80(3): 382–399.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Optimizing Quality of Response Through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39(1): 29–58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35(1): 101–113.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B. and N. Shlomo. 2015. “Selecting Adaptive Survey Design Strata with Partial R-indicators.” International Statistical Review 85(1): 143–163. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12159.10.1111/insr.12159]Search in Google Scholar
[Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 231–253.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sheehan, K.B. 2001. “Email Survey Response Rates: A Review.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6(2): 1–16.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Shlomo, N., B. Schouten, and V. de Heij. 2013. Designing Adaptive Survey Designs with R-Indicators. Available at: http://www.risq-project.eu/papers/shlomo-schouten-heij-2013.pdf (accessed February 24 2016).]Search in Google Scholar
[Singer, E. and C. Ye. 2013. “The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 112.10.1177/0002716212458082]Search in Google Scholar
[Uhrig, S.C. 2008. The Nature and Causes of Attrition in the British Household Panel Study. ISER Working Paper Series, 2008(05). Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J.R. 2008. Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias, PhD Dissertation. University of Michigan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, J.R. 2012. “Research Synthesis: a Comparison of Alternative Indicators for the Risk of Nonresponse Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 555–575. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs032.10.1093/poq/nfs032627697530538342]Search in Google Scholar
[Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2009. “Identifying Factors Affecting Longitudinal Survey Response.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, pp. 157–181. Chichester: Wiley. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743874.10.1002/9780470743874]Search in Google Scholar
[White, N., T. Bourne, and A. Patterson. 2011. Understanding Society Innovation Panel 2: Technical Report. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/innovation-panel/technical-reports (accessed January 24 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Yu, J. and H. Cooper. 1983. “A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires.” Journal of Marketing Research 20(1): 36–44.10.1177/002224378302000105]Search in Google Scholar