Open Access

The Implications of Alternative Allocation Criteria in Adaptive Design for Panel Surveys

Journal of Official Statistics's Cover Image
Journal of Official Statistics
Special Issue on Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design

Cite

Al Baghal, T. (ed.). 2014. “Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 6: Results from Methodological Experiments.” Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2014-04. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understanding-society/2014-04.pdf (accessed 24 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Al Baghal, T. (ed.). 2015. “Wave 7: Results from Methodological Experiments.” Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2015-03. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understanding-society/2015-03.pdf (accessed 24 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Bethlehem, J., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. New Jersey: Wiley.10.1002/9780470891056Search in Google Scholar

Burton, J. (ed.). 2013. “Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 5: Results from Methodological Experiments.” Understanding Society Working Paper Series 2013-06. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/research/publications/working-paper/understanding-society/2013-06.pdf (accessed 24 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Calinescu, M. and B. Schouten. 2015. “Adaptive Survey Designs to Minimize Survey Mode Effects – a Case Study on the Dutch Labor Force Survey.” Survey Methodology 41(2): 403–425.Search in Google Scholar

Durrant, G., R.M. Groves, L. Staetsky, and F. Steele. 2010. “Effects of Interviewer Attitudes and Behaviors on Refusal in Household Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(1) : 1–36. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp098.10.1093/poq/nfp098Search in Google Scholar

Durrant, G.B., O. Maslovskaya, and P. Smith. 2015. “Modelling Final Outcome and Length of Call Sequence to Improve Efficiency in Interviewer Call Scheduling.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 3: 397–424. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smv008.10.1093/jssam/smv008Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: Wiley.10.1002/0471725277Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M., J.M. Brick, W. Kalsbeek, B. Harris-Kojetin, F. Kreuter, B.-E. Pennell, T. Raghunathan, B. Schouten, T. Smith, R. Tourangeau, A. Bowers, M. Jans, C. Kennedy, R. Levenstein, K. Olson, E. Peytcheva, S. Ziniel, and J. Wagner. 2008. “Issues Facing the Field: Alternative Practical Measures of Representativeness of Survey Respondent Pools.” Survey Practice 1(3): 1–6.10.29115/SP-2008-0013Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and M.P. Couper. 1998. Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781118490082Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 169: 439–457.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.xSearch in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and E. Peytcheva. 2008. “The Impact of Nonresponse Rates on Nonresponse Bias: A Meta-Analysis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72(2): 167–189. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011.10.1093/poq/nfn011Search in Google Scholar

Jäckle, A., P. Lynn, and J. Burton. 2015. “Going Online with a Face-to-Face Household Panel: Effects of a Mixed Mode Design on Item and Unit Nonresponse.” Survey Research Methods 9(1): 57–70. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2015.v9i1.5475.Search in Google Scholar

Kanuk, L. and C. Berenson. 1975. “Mail Surveys and Response Rates: A Literature Review.” Journal of Marketing Research 12: 440–453.10.1177/002224377501200408Search in Google Scholar

Kaplowitz, M.D., T.D. Hadlock, and R. Levine. 2004. “A Comparison of Web and Mail Survey Response Rates.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 94–101.10.1093/poq/nfh006Search in Google Scholar

Kaplowitz, M.D., F. Lupi, M.P. Couper, and L. Thorp. 2012. “The Effect of Invitation Design on Web Survey Response Rates.” Social Science Computer Review 30(3): 339–349. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439311419084.10.1177/0894439311419084Search in Google Scholar

Kish, L. 1965. Survey Sampling. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Lundquist, P. and C.-E. Särndal. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Design with Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29(4): 557–582. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040.10.2478/jos-2013-0040Search in Google Scholar

Lynn, P. 2014. “Targeted Response Inducement Strategies on Longitudinal Surveys.” In Improving Survey Methods: Lessons from Recent Research, edited by U. Engel, B. Jann, P. Lynn, A. Scherpenzeel, and P. Sturgis, pp. 322–338. Abingdon UK: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lynn, P. 2017. “From Standardised to Targeted Survey Procedures for Tackling Non-Response and Attrition.” Survey Research Methods 11(1): 93–103. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2017.v11i1.6734.Search in Google Scholar

Lynn, P. and A. Jäckle. in press. “Mounting Multiple Experiments on Longitudinal Social Surveys: Design and Implementation Considerations.” In Experimental Methods in Survey Research: Techniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment, edited by P.J. Lavrakas, M.W. Traugott, C. Kennedy, A.L. Holbrook, E.D. De Leeuw, and B.T. West. Hoboken NJ: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.-E. 2011. “The 2010 Morris Hansen Lecture: Dealing with Survey Nonresponse in Data Collection, in Estimation.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(1): 1–21.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., J. Bethlehem, K. Beullens, O. Kleven, G. Loosveldt, A. Luiten, K. Rutar, N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2012. “Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring, and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response Through R-Indicators and Partial RIndicators.” International Statistical Review 80(3): 382–399.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.xSearch in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Optimizing Quality of Response Through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39(1): 29–58.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., F. Cobben, and J. Bethlehem. 2009. “Indicators for the Representativeness of Survey Response.” Survey Methodology 35(1): 101–113.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B. and N. Shlomo. 2015. “Selecting Adaptive Survey Design Strata with Partial R-indicators.” International Statistical Review 85(1): 143–163. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12159.10.1111/insr.12159Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2011. “Indicators for Monitoring and Improving Representativeness of Response.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 231–253.Search in Google Scholar

Sheehan, K.B. 2001. “Email Survey Response Rates: A Review.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 6(2): 1–16.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.xSearch in Google Scholar

Shlomo, N., B. Schouten, and V. de Heij. 2013. Designing Adaptive Survey Designs with R-Indicators. Available at: http://www.risq-project.eu/papers/shlomo-schouten-heij-2013.pdf (accessed February 24 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Singer, E. and C. Ye. 2013. “The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645: 112.10.1177/0002716212458082Search in Google Scholar

Uhrig, S.C. 2008. The Nature and Causes of Attrition in the British Household Panel Study. ISER Working Paper Series, 2008(05). Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, J.R. 2008. Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias, PhD Dissertation. University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, J.R. 2012. “Research Synthesis: a Comparison of Alternative Indicators for the Risk of Nonresponse Bias.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3): 555–575. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs032.10.1093/poq/nfs032627697530538342Search in Google Scholar

Watson, N. and M. Wooden. 2009. “Identifying Factors Affecting Longitudinal Survey Response.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, pp. 157–181. Chichester: Wiley. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743874.10.1002/9780470743874Search in Google Scholar

White, N., T. Bourne, and A. Patterson. 2011. Understanding Society Innovation Panel 2: Technical Report. Available at: https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/innovation-panel/technical-reports (accessed January 24 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Yu, J. and H. Cooper. 1983. “A Quantitative Review of Research Design Effects on Response Rates to Questionnaires.” Journal of Marketing Research 20(1): 36–44.10.1177/002224378302000105Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-7367
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Mathematics, Probability and Statistics