Open Access

Robustness of Adaptive Survey Designs to Inaccuracy of Design Parameters

Journal of Official Statistics's Cover Image
Journal of Official Statistics
Special Issue on Responsive and Adaptive Survey Design

Cite

Bethlehem, J., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. Hoboken: Wiley.10.1002/9780470891056Search in Google Scholar

Bruin, L., N. Mushkudiani, and B. Schouten. 2016. “A Bayesian Analysis of Mixed-Mode Data Collection.” Paper presented at the 71st Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Austin TX, May 12–15. Available at: http://hummedia.manchester.ac.uk/institutes/cmist/BADEN/workshop-2016/AAPOR_Bruin-Mushkudiani-Schouten.pdf (accessed June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Calaway, R., Revolution Analytics, and S. Weston. 2015a. “Package ‘foreach.” Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=foreach (accessed June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Calaway, R., Revolution Analytics, S. Weston, and D. Tenenbaum. 2015b. “Package ‘doParallel’.” Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=doParallel (accessed June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Calinescu, M. and B. Schouten. 2015. “Adaptive Survey Designs to Minimize Survey Mode Effects––a Case Study on the Dutch Labor Force Survey.” Survey Methodology 41: 403–425.Search in Google Scholar

Calinescu, M. and B. Schouten. 2016. “Adaptive Survey Designs for Nonresponse and Measurement Error in Multi-Purpose Surveys.” Survey Research Methods 10: 35–47. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2016.v10i1.6157.Search in Google Scholar

Calinescu, M., S. Bhulai, and B. Schouten. 2013. “Optimal Resource Allocation in Survey Designs.” European Journal of Operational Research 226: 115–121. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.046.10.1016/j.ejor.2012.10.046Search in Google Scholar

CBS. 2015. Onderzoek Verplaatsingen in Nederland 2015. Onderzoeksbeschrijving. The Hague/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands. Available at: https://www.cbs.nl/-/media/_pdf/2016/38/2016ep27.pdf (accessed June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Chesnut, J. 2013. Model-Based Mode of Data Collection Switching from Internet to Mail in the American Community Survey. Washington: US Census Bureau. Available at: https://census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/working-papers/2013/acs/2013_Chesnut_01.pdf (accessed June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Deming, W.E. and F.F. Stephan. 1940. “On a Least Squares of Adjustment of a Sampled Frequency Table When the Expected Totals Are Known.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 11: 427–444. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177731829.10.1214/aoms/1177731829Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 169: 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.xSearch in Google Scholar

Johnson, S.G. 2016. “The NLopt Nonlinear-Optimization Package.” Available at: http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/NLopt (accessed June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Kish, K. 1987. “Weighting in Deft2.” The Survey Statistician 17: 26–30.Search in Google Scholar

Laflamme, F. and M. Karaganis. 2010. “Implementation of Responsive Collection Design for CATI Surveys at Statistics Canada.” Paper presented at the European Conference on Quality in Official Statistics (Q2010), Helsinki, May 4–6. Available at: https://q2010.stat.fi/sessions/session-29 (accessed June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Perryck, K. 2015. Assessing the Impact of Inaccuracy in Design Parameters on the Performance of Adaptive Survey Designs. Utrecht: Utrecht University. (MSc thesis.)Search in Google Scholar

Peytchev, A., S. Riley, J. Rosen, J. Murphy, and M. Lindblad. 2010. “Reduction of Nonresponse Bias through Case Prioritization.” Survey Research Methods 4: 21–29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i1.3037.Search in Google Scholar

Powell, M.J.D. 1994. “A Direct Search Optimization Method that Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation.” In Advances in Optimization and Numerical Analysis, edited by S. Gomez and J.-P. Hennart, 51–67. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-015-8330-5_4Search in Google Scholar

R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.-E. and P. Lundquist. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Survey Design with Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29: 557–582. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040.10.2478/jos-2013-0040Search in Google Scholar

Särndal, C.-E., B. Swensson, and J. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B. and N. Shlomo. 2015. Selecting Adaptive Survey Design Strata with Partial R-indicators. The Hague/Heerlen: Statistics Netherlands. (Discussion paper 201521.)10.1111/insr.12159Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013a. “Optimizing Quality of Response Through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39: 29–58.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., J. van den Brakel, B. Buelens, J. van der Laan, and Th. Klausch. 2013b. “Disentangling Mode-Specific Selection and Measurement Bias in Social Surveys.” Social Science Research 42: 1555–1570. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.005.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.00524090851Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., F. Cobben, P. Lundquist, and J. Wagner. 2016. “Does More Balanced Survey Response Imply Less Non-Response Bias?” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 179: 727–748. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12152.10.1111/rssa.12152Search in Google Scholar

Sutton, R.S. and A.G. Barto. 2012. Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. Second edition. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tourangeau, R., J.M. Brick, S. Lohr, and J. Li. 2017. “Adaptive and Responsive Survey Designs: a Review and Assessment.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 180: 203–223. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12186.10.1111/rssa.12186Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, J. 2008. Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. (Doctoral thesis.)Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, J. 2013. “Adaptive Contact Strategies in Telephone and Face-to-face Surveys.” Survey Research Methods 7: 45–55. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2013.v7i1.5037.Search in Google Scholar

Ypma, J. 2015. “Package ‘nloptr’.” Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/package=nloptr (accessed June 2017).Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-7367
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Mathematics, Probability and Statistics