Fieldwork Monitoring for the European Social Survey: An illustration with Belgium and the Czech Republic in Round 7

European Social Survey (ESS). 2014. European Social Survey Round 7 Data. Data file edition 1.0. Norway: Norwegian Social Science Data Services. Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.Search in Google Scholar

European Social Survey (ESS). 2011. Round 6 Specification for Participating Countries. London: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University London. Available at: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round6/methods/ESS6_project_specification.pdf (accessed March 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and S.G. Heeringa. 2006. “Responsive Design for Household Surveys: Tools for Actively Controlling Survey Errors and Costs.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society 169(3): 439–457. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2006.00423.xSearch in Google Scholar

Jans, M., R. Sirkis, and D. Morgan. 2013. “Managing Data Quality Indicators with Paradata based Statistical Quality Control Tools: the Keys to Survey Performance.” In Improving Surveys with Paradata. Analytic Uses of Process Information, edited by Frauke Kreuter, 191–229. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118596869.ch9Search in Google Scholar

Juran, J.M. and F.M. Gryna. 1988. Juran’s Quality Control Handbook, 4^th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Kirgis, N.G. and J.M. Lepkowski. 2013. “Design and Management Strategies for Paradata-driven Response Design: Illustration from the 2006–2010 National Design of Family Growth.” In Improving Surveys with Paradata. Analytic Uses of Process Information, edited by Frauke Kreuter, 191–229. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118596869.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Kohler, U. 2007. “Surveys from inside: An Assessment of Unit Nonresponse Bias with Internal Criteria.” Survey Research Methods 1(2): 55–67. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2007.v1i2.75.Search in Google Scholar

Kreuter, F., M. Couper, and L. Lyberg. 2010. “The Use of Paradata to Monitor and Manage Survey Data Collection.” In Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association, 282–296. Vancouver: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/y2010/Files/306107_55863.pdf (accessed March 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Laflamme, F., M. Maydan, and A. Miller. 2008. “Using Paradata to Actively Manage Data Collection Survey Process.” In Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association, 630–637. Denver: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/y2008/Files/300608.pdf (accessed March 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Laflamme, F. 2009. “Data Collection Research Using Paradata at Statistics Canada.” In Proceeding of Statistics Canada’s International Symposium Series. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-522-x/2008000/article/10997-eng.pdf (accessed March 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Luiten, A. and B. Schouten. 2013. “Tailored Fieldwork Design to Increase Representative Household Survey Response: An Experiment in the Survey of Consumer Satisfaction.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A: Statistics in Society 176(1): 169–189. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.x.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01080.xSearch in Google Scholar

Lundquist, P. and C.-E. Särndal. 2013. “Aspects of Responsive Design with Applications to the Swedish Living Conditions Survey.” Journal of Official Statistics 29(4): 557–582. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2013-0040.10.2478/jos-2013-0040Search in Google Scholar

Malter, F. 2013. “Fieldwork Monitoring in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE).” Survey Methods: Insights from the Field, 1–8. http://surveyinsights.org/?p=1974. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2014-00006.Search in Google Scholar

Matsuo, H. and G. Loosveldt. 2013. Report on quality assessment of contact data files in Round 5: Final report 27 countries. Leuven: European Social Survey, University of Leuven. Available at: https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round5/methods/ESS5_response_based_quality_assessment_e01.pdf (accessed March 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Peytchev, A., S. Riley, J. Rosen, J. Murphy, and M. Lindblad. 2010. “Reduction of Nonresponse Bias in Surveys through Case Prioritization.” Survey Research Methods 4(1): 21–29. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i1.3037.Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., J. Bethlehem, K. Beullens, O. Kleven, G. Loosveldt, A. Luiten, K. Rutar, N. Shlomo, and C. Skinner. 2012. “Evaluating, Comparing, Monitoring, and Improving Representativeness of Survey Response through R-Indicators and Partial R-Indicators.” International Statistical Review 80(3): 382–399. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.x.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2012.00189.xSearch in Google Scholar

Schouten, B., M. Calinescu, and A. Luiten. 2013. “Article Optimizing Quality of Response through Adaptive Survey Designs.” Survey Methodology 39(1): 29–58. Available at: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/12-001-x/2013001/article/11824-eng.pdf (accessed March 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Schouten, B. and N. Shlomo. 2015. “Selecting Adaptive Survey Design Strata with Partial R-Indicators.” International Statistical Review, Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12159.10.1111/insr.12159Search in Google Scholar

Shewart, W.A. 1931. Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured products. Princeton, New Jersey: van Nostrand Reinhold Co.Search in Google Scholar

Shewart, W.A. 1939. Statistical Methods from the View Point of Quality control. Washington: The Graduate School, the department of Agriculture.Search in Google Scholar

Vandenplas, C., G. Loosveldt, and K. Beullens. 2015. “Better or Longer? The Evolution of Weekly Number of Completed Interviews over the Fieldwork Period in the European Social Survey.” Paper presented at the Nonresponse Workshop, Leuven 2015. Available at: https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/521789 (accessed March 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Vandenplas, C. and G. Loosveldt. 2017. “Modeling the Evolution of Fieldwork in Terms of Quality Indicators: Six Rounds of the European Social Survey.” Journal of Statistics and Methodolgy 5(2): 212–232. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smw034.10.1093/jssam/smw034Search in Google Scholar

Wagner, J. 2008. Adaptive Survey Design to Reduce Nonresponse Bias. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Michigan. Available at: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/60831/jameswag_1.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed March 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, L.C., I.B. Thomsen, and O. Kleven. 2013. “On the Use of Auxiliary and Paradata for Dealing with Non-Sampling Errors in Household Surveys.” International Statistical Review 81(2): 270–288. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/insr.12009.10.1111/insr.12009Search in Google Scholar