The Influence of an Up-Front Experiment on Respondents’ Recording Behaviour in Payment Diaries: Evidence from Germany

Awel, Y.M. and T.T. Azamahou. 2015. “Risk Preference or Financial Literacy? Behavioural Experiment on Index Insurance Demand.” UNU-MERIT Working Papers 2015-005, Maastricht. Available at: http://www.merit.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/abstract/?id=5626 (accessed August 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Axhausen, K.W., A. Zimmermann, S. Schönfelder, G. Rindsfüser, and T. Haupt. 2002. “Observing the Rhythms of Daily Life: A Six-Week Travel Diary.” Transportation 29(2): 95–124. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014247822322.10.1023/A:1014247822322Search in Google Scholar

Bagnall, J., D. Bounie, K.P. Huynh, A. Kosse, T. Schmidt, S.D. Schuh, and H. Stix. 2016. “Consumer Cash Usage: A Cross-Country Comparison with Payment Diary Survey Data.” International Journal of Central Banking 12(4): 1–62. Available at: http://www.ijcb.org/journal/ijcb16q4a1.htm (accessed December 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Biemer, P.P. and L.E. Lyberg. 2003. Introduction to Survey Quality. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/0471458740Search in Google Scholar

Bonke, J. and P. Fallesen. 2010. “The Impact of Incentives and Interview Methods on Response Quantity and Quality in Diary- and Booklet-Based Surveys.” Survey Research Methods 4(2): 91–101. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i2.3614.Search in Google Scholar

Borghans, L., J.J. Heckman, B.H. Golsteyn, and H. Meijers. 2009. “Gender Differences in Risk Aversion and Ambiguity Aversion.” Journal of the European Economic Association 7(2–3): 649–658. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11238-016-9565-9.10.1007/s11238-016-9565-9Search in Google Scholar

Charness, G. and U. Gneezy. 2010. “Portfolio Choice and Risk Attitudes: An Experiment.” Economic Inquiry 48(1): 133–146. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00219.x.10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00219.xSearch in Google Scholar

Charness, G., U. Gneezy, and A. Imas. 2013. “Experimental Methods: Eliciting Risk Preferences.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 87: 43–51. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.023.10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.023Search in Google Scholar

Davern, M., T.H. Rockwood, R. Sherrod, and S. Campbell. 2003. “Prepaid Monetary Incentives and Data Quality in Face-to-Face Interviews: Data from the 1996 Survey of Income and Program Participation Incentive Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67(1): 139–147. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/346012.10.1086/346012Search in Google Scholar

Deutsche Bundesbank. 2015. Payment Behaviour in Germany in 2014. Third Study on the Utilisation of Cash and Cashless Payment Instruments. Frankfurt am Main: Deutsche Bundesbank. Available at: http://www.bundesbank.de/Redaktion/EN/Downloads/Publications/Studies/payment_behaviour_in_germany_in_2014.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (accessed December 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, and U. Sunde. 2010. “Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability?” The American Economic Review 100(3): 1238–1260. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.1238.10.1257/aer.100.3.1238Search in Google Scholar

Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, U. Sunde, J. Schupp, and G.G. Wagner. 2011. “Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants and Behavioral Consequences.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9(3): 522–550. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x.10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.xSearch in Google Scholar

Eckel, C.C. and P.J. Grossman. 2002. “Sex Differences and Statistical Stereotyping in Attitudes Toward Financial Risk.” Evolution and Human Behavior 23(4): 281–295. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1.10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1Search in Google Scholar

Eckel, C.C. and P.J. Grossman. 2008. “Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence.” In Handbook of Experimental Economics Results 1(113), edited by C.R. Plott and V.L. Smith. 1061–1073. New York: Elsevier.10.1016/S1574-0722(07)00113-8Search in Google Scholar

Fricker, S. and R. Tourangeau. 2010. “Examining the Relationship Between Nonresponse Propensity and Data Quality in Two National Household Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 934–955. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq064.10.1093/poq/nfq064Search in Google Scholar

Godwin, R.K. 1979. “The Consequences of Large Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys of Elites.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43(3): 378–387. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268528.10.1086/268528Search in Google Scholar

Goetz, E.G., T.R. Tyler, and F.L. Cook. 1984. “Promised Incentives in Media Research: A Look at Data Quality, Sample Representativeness and Response Rates.” Journal of Marketing Research 21(2): 148–154. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151697.10.2307/3151697Search in Google Scholar

Goldenberg, K., D. McGrath, and L. Tan. 2009. “The Effects of Incentives on the Consumer Expenditure Interview Survey.” Paper presented at the 64^th Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 14 – 17, 2009, Hollywood, Florida. Available at: https://stats.bls.gov/osmr/pdf/st090100.pdf (accessed December 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Goldenberg, K. and J. Ryan. 2009. “Evolution and Change in the Consumer Expenditure Surveys: Adapting Methodologies to Meet Changing Needs.” Paper presented at the NBER Summer Institute 2009 – Conference on Research on Income and Wealth, July 13, 2009, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Available at: https://www.bls.gov/cex/research_papers/pdf/Evolution-and-Change-in-the-Consumer-Expenditure-Surveys-Adapting-Methodologies-to-Meet-Changing-Needs.pdf (accessed December 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Göritz, A.S. 2004. “The Impact of Material Incentives on Response Quantity, Response Quality, Sample Composition, Survey Outcome, and Cost in Online Access Panels.” International Journal of Market Research 46(3): 327–345. Available at: https://www.mrs.org.uk/ijmr_article/article/79180 (accessed January 2016).10.1177/147078530404600307Search in Google Scholar

Göritz, A.S. 2005. “Contingent versus Unconditional Incentives in WWW-Studies.” Metodolosky Zvezki 2(1): 1–14. Available at: http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/pub/mz/mz2.1/goritz.pdf (accessed January 2016).10.51936/kljg4387Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M., R.B. Cialdini and M.P. Couper. 1992. “Understanding the Decision to Participate in a Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 56(4): 475–495. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269338.10.1086/269338Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. 2004. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R.M. and L. Lyberg. 2010. “Total Survey Error: Past, Present, and Future.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(5): 849–879. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq065.10.1093/poq/nfq065Search in Google Scholar

Halek, M. and J.G. Eisenhauer. 2001. “Demography of Risk Aversion.” Journal of Risk and Insurance 68(1): 1–24. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2678130.10.2307/2678130Search in Google Scholar

Hedlin, D., T. Dale, G. Haraldsen, and J. Jones (eds.). 2005. “Developing Methods for Assessing Perceived Response Burden. Research Report.” Stockholm: Statistics Sweden, Oslo: Statistics Norway, and London: Office for National Statistics. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/64157/4374310/10-DEVELOPING-METHODS-FOR-ASSESSING-PERCEIVED-RESPONSE-BURDEN.pdf/1900efc8-1a07-4482-b3c9-be88ee71df3b (accessed November 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H. 2003. “New Sampling Designs and the Quality of Data.” In Developments in Applied Statistics. Methodoloski zvezki 19, edited by A. Ferligoj and A. Mrvar. 205–217. Ljubljana: FDV.Search in Google Scholar

James, J.M. and R. Bolstein. 1990. “The Effect of Monetary Incentives and Follow-Up Mailings on the Response Rate and Response Quality in Mail Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54(3): 346–361. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269211.10.1086/269211Search in Google Scholar

Jones, J. 2012. “Response Burden: Introductory Overview Lecture.” Paper presented at the 4th International Establishment Surveys Conference, June 11–14, 2012, Montreal, Canada. Available at: https://ww2.amstat.org/meetings/ices/2012/papers/302289.pdf (accessed July 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Jonker, N. and A. Kosse. 2013. “Estimating Cash Usage: The Impact of Survey Design on Research Outcomes.” De Economist 161(1): 19–44. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10645-012-9200-2.10.1007/s10645-012-9200-2Search in Google Scholar

Laurie, H. and P. Lynn. 2009. “The Use of Respondent Incentives on Longitudinal Surveys.” In Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys, edited by P. Lynn, 205–234. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9780470743874.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Schwarz, N. and G.L. Clore. 1996. “Feelings and Phenomenal Experiences.” In Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, edited by E.T. Higgins and A. Kruglanski, 433–465. New York: Guilford.Search in Google Scholar

Sharp, L.M. and J. Frankel. 1983. “Respondent Burden: A Test of Some Common Assumptions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 47(1): 36–53. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/268765.10.1086/268765Search in Google Scholar

Shettle, C. and G. Mooney. 1999. “Monetary Incentives in US Government Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 15(2): 231–250. Available at: http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article=152231 (accessed January 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Shuttleworth, F.K. 1931. “A Study of Questionnaire Technique.” Journal of Educational Psychology 22(9): 652–658. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0074591.10.1037/h0074591Search in Google Scholar

Singer, E., J. Van Hoewyk, and M. Maher. 2000. “Experiments with Incentives in Telephone Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64(2): 171–188. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/317761.10.1086/31776110984332Search in Google Scholar

Tzamourani, P. and P. Lynn. 1999. “The Effect of Monetary Incentives on Data Quality – Results from the Social Attitudes Survey 1998 experiment.” CREST Working Paper 73, Oxford, UK. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.573.5965&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed January 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, H.F. 2005. The Total Survey Error Approach. A Guide To The New Science Of Survey Research. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226891293.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Willimack, D.K., H. Schuman, B.E. Pennell, and J.M. Lepkowski. 1995. “Effects of a Prepaid Nonmonetary Incentive on Response Rates and Response Quality in a Face-to-Face Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 59(1): 78–92. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269459.10.1086/269459Search in Google Scholar