Effects of Scale Direction on Response Style of Ordinal Rating Scales

Baumgartner, H. and J.E.M. Steenkamp. 2001. “Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation.” Journal of Marketing Research 38: 143-156. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.143.18840.10.1509/jmkr.38.2.143.18840Search in Google Scholar

Belson, W.A. 1966. “Effects of Reversing Presentation Order of Verbal Rating Scales.” Journal of Advertising Research 6: 30-37.Search in Google Scholar

Carp, F.M. 1974. “Position Effects on Interview Responses.” Journal of Gerontology 29: 581-587. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronj/29.5.581.10.1093/geronj/29.5.5814853701Search in Google Scholar

Chan, J.C. 1991. “Response-Order Effect in Likert-Type Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 51: 531-540. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164491513002.10.1177/0013164491513002Search in Google Scholar

Christian, L.M., D.A. Dillman, and J.D. Smyth. 2008. “The Effects of Mode and Format on Answers to Scalar Questions in Telephone and Web Surveys.” In Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by J.M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, J.M. Brick, E.D. De Leeuw, L. Japec, P.J. Lavrakas,M.W.Link, R.L. Sangster, 250-275.New Jersey: JohnWiley&Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470173404.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Dillman, D.A., T.L. Brown, J.E. Carlson, E.H. Carpenter, F.O. Lorenz, R. Mason, J. Saltiel, and R.L. Songster. 1995. “Effects of Category Order on Answers in Mail and Telephone Surveys.” Rural Sociology 60: 674-687. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j. 1549-0831.1995.tb00600.x.10.1111/j.1549-0831.1995.tb00600.xSearch in Google Scholar

He, L., T. Yan, F. Keusch and S. Han. 2014. “The impact of question and scale characteristics on scale direction effect.” In Proccedings of the AAPOR 69th Annual Conference, Anaheim, California, May 15-18. Available at: http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/AnnualMeetingProceedings/2014/Session-J-6-2-He-Y.pdf (accessed January 2017).Search in Google Scholar

Kalton, G., M. Collins, and L. Brook. 1978. “Experiments in Wording Opinion Questions.” Applied Statistics, 149-161. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2346942.10.2307/2346942Search in Google Scholar

Kieruj, N.D. and G. Moors. 2010. “Variations in Response Style Behavior by Response Scale Format in Attitude Research.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22: 320-342. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edq001.10.1093/ijpor/edq001Search in Google Scholar

Kieruj, N.D. and G. Moors. 2013. “Response Style Behavior: Question Format Dependent or Personal Style?” Quality & Quantity 47: 193-211. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9511-4.10.1007/s11135-011-9511-4Search in Google Scholar

Krebs, D. and J.H.P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik. 2010. “Positive First or Negative First?: Effects of the Order of Answering Categories on Response Behavior.” Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences 6: 118-127. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000013.10.1027/1614-2241/a000013Search in Google Scholar

Krosnick, J.A. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 213-236. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305.10.1002/acp.2350050305Search in Google Scholar

Krosnick, J.A. and S. Presser. 2010. “Question and Questionnaire Design.” In Handbook of Survey Research, Second Edition, edited by P.V. Marsden and J.D. Wright, 263-314. United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, M., F.G. Conrad, and S. Lee. 2016. “Comparing Acquiescent and Extreme Response Styles in Face-to-Face and Web Surveys.” Quality & Quantity. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0320-7.10.1007/s11135-016-0320-7Search in Google Scholar

Liu, M., S. Lee, and F.G. Conrad. 2015. “Comparing Extreme Response Styles between Agree-Disagree and Item-Specific Scales.” Public Opinion Quarterly 79: 952-975. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv034.10.1093/poq/nfv034Search in Google Scholar

Mingay, D.J. and M.T. Greenwell. 1989. “Memory Bias and Response-Order Effects.” Journal of Official Statistics 5: 253-263.Search in Google Scholar

Moors, G. 2003. “Diagnosing Response Style Behavior by Means of a Latent-Class Factor Approach. Socio-Demographic Correlates of Gender Role Attitudes and Perceptions of Ethnic Discrimination Reexamined.” Quality and Quantity 37: 277-302. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024472110002.10.1023/A:1024472110002Search in Google Scholar

Moors, G. 2008. “Exploring the Effect of a Middle Response Category on Response Style in Attitude Measurement.” Quality & Quantity 42: 779-794. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9067-x.10.1007/s11135-006-9067-x279897520084107Search in Google Scholar

Moors, G., N.D. Kieruj, and J.K. Vermunt. 2014. “The Effect of Labeling and Numbering of Response Scales on the Likelihood of Response Bias.” Sociological Methodology 44: 369-399. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0081175013516114.10.1177/0081175013516114Search in Google Scholar

Morren, M., J.P.T.M. Gelissen, and J.K. Vermunt. 2011. “Dealing With Extreme Response Style In Cross-Cultural Research: A Restricted Latent Class Factor Analysis Approach: Extreme Response Style In Cross-Cultural Research.” Sociological Methodology 41: 13-47. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01238.x.10.1111/j.1467-9531.2011.01238.xSearch in Google Scholar

Paulhus, D.L. 1991. “Measurement and Control of Response Bias.” Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. Volume 1 in Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes Series. Available at: http://doi.apa.org/psycinfo/1991-97206-001.10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-XSearch in Google Scholar

Revilla, M.A., W.E. Saris, and J.A. Krosnick. 2013. “Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree-Disagree Scales.” Sociological Methods & Research 43: 73-97. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124113509605.10.1177/0049124113509605Search in Google Scholar

Salzberger, T. and M. Koller. 2013. “Towards a New Paradigm of Measurement in Marketing.” Journal of Business Research 66: 1307-1317.10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.030Search in Google Scholar

Saris, W.E. and I.N. Gallhofer. 2007. “Estimation of the Effects of Measurement Characteristics on the Quality of Survey Questions.” In Design, Evaluation, and Analysis of Questionnaires for Survey Research, edited by W.E. Saris and I.N. Gallhofer, 237-253. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.10.1002/9780470165195.ch12Search in Google Scholar

Stapleton, C. 2013. “The Smart (phone)Way to Collect Survey Data.” Survey Practice 6(2).10.29115/SP-2013-0011Search in Google Scholar

Tourangeau, R., M.P. Couper, and F.G. Conrad. 2004. “Spacing, Position, and Order Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 368-393. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh035.10.1093/poq/nfh035Search in Google Scholar

Tourangeau, R., M.P. Couper, and F.G. Conrad. 2007. “Color, Labels, and Interpretive Heuristics for Response Scales.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71: 91-112. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl046.10.1093/poq/nfl046Search in Google Scholar

Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185: 1124-1131. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124.10.1126/science.185.4157.112417835457Search in Google Scholar

Vermunt, J.K. and J. Magidson. 2013. Technical guide for Latent GOLD 5.0: Basic, advanced, and syntax. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc. Search in Google Scholar

Yan, T. and F. Keusch. 2015. “The Effects of the Direction of Rating Scales on Survey Responses in a Telephone Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 79: 145-165. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu062. 10.1093/poq/nfu062Search in Google Scholar