Is the Short Version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-S) Applicable for Use in Telephone Surveys?

Asparouhov, T. and B. Muthen. 2008. “Multilevel Mixture Models.” In Advances in Latent Variable Mixture Models, edited by G.R. Hancock and K.M. Samuelsen, 27–51. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Bentler, P. 1990. “Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models.” Psychological Bulletin 107: 238–246.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238Search in Google Scholar

Brannick, M.T. 1995. “Critical Comments on Applying Covariance Structure Modeling.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 16: 201–213. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160303.Search in Google Scholar

Browne, M.W. 2001. “An Overview of Analytic Rotation in Exploratory Factor Analysis.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 36: 111–150. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3601_05.Search in Google Scholar

Caspi, A., B.W. Roberts, and R.L. Shiner. 2005. “Personality Development: Stability and Change.” Annual Review of Psychology 56: 453–484. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, F.F. 2007. “Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance.” Structural Equation Modeling 14: 464–504. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.Search in Google Scholar

Cheung, G.W. and R.B. Rensvold. 1999. “Testing Factorial Invariance Across Groups: A Reconceptualization and Proposed New Method.” Journal of Management 25: 1–27. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639902500101.Search in Google Scholar

Dehne, M. and J. Schupp. 2007. “Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im Sozio-ökonomischen Panel (SOEP) – Konzept, Umsetzung und empirische Eigenschaften”. DIW Research Notes 26. Berlin: DIW Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Gabler, S. and Ö. Ayhan. 2007. “Gewichtung bei Erhebungen im Festnetz und über Mobilfunk: Ein Dual-Frame Ansatz”. In Mobilfunktelefonie – Eine Herausforderung für die Umfrageforschung, edited by S. Gabler and S. Häder, 39–45, ZUMANachrichten Spezial, Vol. 13. Mannheim: GESIS.Search in Google Scholar

Gabler, S., and S. Häder. 2002. “Idiosyncrasies in Telephone Sampling – The Case of Germany.” IJPOR 14: 339–345. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.3.339.Search in Google Scholar

Gabler, S., S. Haeder, I. Lehnhoff, and E. Mardian. 2012. “Weighting for Unequal Inclusion Probabilities and Nonresponse in Dual Frame Telephone Surveys.” In Telephone Surveys in Europe, edited by S. Häder, M. Häder, and M. Kühne, 147–168. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-25411-6_11Search in Google Scholar

Gerlitz, J. and J. Schupp. 2005. “Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeitsmerkmale im SOEP”. DIW Research Notes 4. Berlin: DIW Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Goebel, J., M. Grabka, P. Krause, M. Kroh, R. Pischner, I. Sieber, and M. Spiess. 2008. “Mikrodaten, Gewichtung und Datenstruktur der Längsschnittstudie Sozio-oekonomisches Panel (SOEP).” In Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 3, edited by J. Frick, O. Groh-Samberg, J. Schupp and K. Spiess, 77–109. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/vjh.77.3.77.Search in Google Scholar

Goldberg, L.R., D. Sweeney, P.F. Merenda, and J.E. Hughes. 1998. “Demographic Variables and Personality: The Effects of Gender, Age, Education, and Ethnic/Racial Status on Self-Descriptions of Personality Attributes.” Personality and Individual Differences 24: 393–403. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00110-4.Search in Google Scholar

Gosling, S., P. Rentfrow, and W. Swann. 2003. “A Very Brief Measure of the Big Five Personality Domains.” Journal of Research in Personality 37: 504–528. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1)00046-1.Search in Google Scholar

Häder, M. 2012. “Data Quality in Telephone Surveys via Mobile and Landline Phone.” In Telephone Surveys in Europe, edited by S. Häder, M. Häder, and M. Kühne, 247–262. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-25411-6_16Search in Google Scholar

Häder, M. and M. Kühne. 2010. “Mobiltelefonerfahrung und Antwortqualität bei Umfragen.” Methoden, Daten, Analysen 4: 105–112.Search in Google Scholar

Häder, S., I. Lehnhoff, and E. Mardian. 2010. “Mobile Phone Surveys: Empirical Findings from a Research Project.” ASK. Society. Research. Methods 19: 3–19.Search in Google Scholar

Heaven, P. and S. Bucci. 2001. “Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation and Personality: An Analysis Using the IPIP Measure.” European Journal of Personality 15: 49–56. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.389.Search in Google Scholar

Hopwood, C.J. and M.B. Donnellan. 2010. “How Should the Internal Structure of Personality Inventories be Evaluated?” Personality and Social Psychology Review 14: 332–346. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868310361240.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, L. and P.M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6: 1–55. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.Search in Google Scholar

Koch, A. 1998. “Wenn ‘mehr’ nicht gleichbedeutend mit ‘besser’ ist: Ausschöpfungsquoten und Stichprobenverzerrungen in allgemeinen Bevölkerungsumfragen.” ZUMANachrichten 42: 66–90.Search in Google Scholar

Kühne, M., M. Häder, and T. Schlinzig. 2009. “Mode-Effekte bei telefonischen Befragungen über das Festnetz und den Mobilfunk: Auswirkungen auf die Datenqualität.” In Umfrageforschung. Grenzen und Herausforderung, edited by M. Weichbold, C. Wolf, and J. Bacher, 45–62. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-531-91852-5_3Search in Google Scholar

Lang, F.R., O. Lüdtke, and J.B. Asendorpf. 2001. “Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen.” Diagnostica 47: 111–121. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.111.Search in Google Scholar

Lang, F.R., D. John, O. Lüdtke, J. Schupp, and G.B. Wagner. 2011. “Short Assessment of the Big Five: Robust Across Survey Methods Except Telephone Interviewing.” Behavior Research Methods 43: 548 – 567. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0066-z.Search in Google Scholar

Little, R.J.A. 1988. “A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data With Missing Values.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 83: 1198–1202. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2290157.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, H.W., J.R. Balla, and R.P. McDonald. 1988. “Goodness of Fit Indexes in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: The Effect of Sample Size.” Psychological Bulletin 103: 391–410. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.103.3.391.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, H.W., K.-T. Hau, and Z. Wen. 2004. “In Search of Golden Rules: Comment on Hypothesis-Testing Approaches to Setting Cutoff Values for Fit Indexes and Dangers of Overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings.” Structural Equation Modeling 11: 320–341. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, H.W., B. Muthén, A. Asparouhov, O. Lüdtke, A. Robitzsch, A.J.S. Morin, and U. Trautwein. 2009. “Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating CFA and EFA: Application to Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching.” Structural Equation Modeling 16: 439–476. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, H.W., O. Lüdtke, B. Muthén, T. Asparouhov, A.J.S. Morin, U. Trautwein, and B. Nagengast. 2010. “A New Look at the Big Five Factor Structure Through Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling.” Psychological Assessment 22: 471–491. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019227.Search in Google Scholar

Marsh, H.W., B. Nagengast, and A.J.S. Morin. 2013. “Measurement Invariance of Big-Five Factors Over the Life Span: ESEM Test of Gender, Age, Plasticity, Maturity, and La Dolce Vita Effects.” Developmental Psychology 49: 1194–1218. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0026913.Search in Google Scholar

Muthén, L.K. and B.O. Muthén. 1998–2012. Mplus User’s Guide, 7th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.Search in Google Scholar

Rammstedt, B. 2007a. “Welche Vorhersagekraft hat die individuelle Persönlichkeit für inhaltliche sozialwissenschaftliche Variablen?” ZUMA-Arbeitsbericht 2007/01.Search in Google Scholar

Rammstedt, B. 2007b. “The 10-Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10): Norm Values and Investigation of Socio-Demographic Effects Based on a German Population Representative Sample.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 23: 193–201. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.193.Search in Google Scholar

Rammstedt, B., L.R. Goldberg, and I. Borg. 2010. “The Measurement Equivalence of Big Five Factor Markers for Persons with Different Levels of Education.” Journal of Research in Personality 44: 53–61. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.005.Search in Google Scholar

Rammstedt, B. and O.P. John. 2007. “Measuring Personality in One Minute or Less: A 10-Item Short Version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German.” Journal of Research in Personality 41: 203–212. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

Rammstedt, B., C. Kemper, M. Klein, C. Beierlein, and A. Kovaleva. 2013. “A Short Scale for Assessing the Big Five Dimensions of Personality: 10 Item Big Five Inventory (BFI-10).” Methods, Data, Analyses 7: 233–249. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12758/mda.2013.013.Search in Google Scholar

Saucier, G. 2000. “Isms and the Structure of Social Attitudes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 78: 366–385. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.366.Search in Google Scholar

Schneiderat, G. and T. Schlinzig. 2012. “Mobile- and Landline-Onlys in Dual-Frame-Approaches: Effects on Sample Quality.” In Telephone Surveys in Europe, edited by S. Häder, M. Häder, and M. Kühne, 122–143. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-25411-6_10Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, M.F., J. Brice, N. Buck, and E. Prentice-Lane. 2010. British Household Panel Survey User Manual: Volume A. Introduction, Technical Report, and Appendices. Colchester: University of Essex.Search in Google Scholar

Toepoel, V. and P. Lugtig. 2015. “Online Surveys are Mixed-Device Surveys. Issues Associated With the Use of Different (Mobile) Devices in Web Surveys.” Methods, Data, Analyses 9: 155–162. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12758/mda.2015.009.Search in Google Scholar

Tucker, L. and C. Lewis. 1973. “A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis.” Psychometrika 38: 1–10. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170.Search in Google Scholar

Van Hiel, A., M. Pandelaere, and B. Duriez. 2004. “The Impact of Need for Closure on Conservative Beliefs and Racism: Differential Mediation by Authoritarian Submission and Authoritarian Dominance.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30: 824–837. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264333.Search in Google Scholar

West, S.G., J.F. Finch, and P.J. Curran. 1995. “Structural Equation Modeling with Nonnormal Variables: Problems and Remedies.” In Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications, edited by R.H. Hoyle, 37–55. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Ximénez, C. 2006. “A Monte Carlo Study of Recovery of Weak Factor Loadings in Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Structural Equation Modeling 13: 587–614. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem1304_5.Search in Google Scholar