[Aloni R. 2001. Foliar and axial aspects of vascular differentiation: hypotheses and evidence. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 20: 22–34. DOI: 10.1007/s003440010001.10.1007/s003440010001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Alzate A., Royero N., Nuñez V., Cabra J., Tohme J., Mejía-Jiménez A. 2002. Optimization of the in vitro propagation methodology of selected clones of soursop (Annona muricata L.) and evaluation of the compatibility of different scion and rootstock combinations for in vitro micrografting. Annual Report CIAT, Project SB-2, Assessing and utilizing of agrobiodiversity through biotechnology, pp. 318–323.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aminzadeh F., Fattahi Moghaddam M.R., Ebadi A., Hasani D., Blanian H. 2013. Effect of grafting time, antioxidant and plant growth regulators on minigrafting in walnut (Juglans regia L.). Seed and Plant Production Journal 29(2): 269–282. [in Persian with English abstract]]Search in Google Scholar
[Azimi M., Özkaya M.T., Çölgecen H., Büyükkartal H.N. 2016. Analysis of phenolic compounds for determination of cambium differentiation and tracheal elements in olive graft combinations. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 4: 714–720. DOI: 10.18006/2016.4(VIS).714.720.10.18006/2016.4(VIS).714.720]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dehghan B., Vahdati K., Rezaee R., Hassani D. 2009. Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) grafting as influenced by different bench grafting methods and scion cultivars. Journal of Applied Horticulture 11(1): 56–58.10.37855/jah.2009.v11i01.11]Search in Google Scholar
[Errea P., Felipe A., Herrero M. 1994a. Graft establishment between compatible and incompatible Prunus spp. Journal of Experimental Botany 45: 393–401. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/45.3.393.10.1093/jxb/45.3.393]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Errea P., Treutter D., Feucht W. 1994b. Characterization of flavanol type-polyphenols in apricot cultivar and rootstocks. Advances in Horticultural Science 3: 165–169.]Search in Google Scholar
[Errea P., Garay L., Marín J.A. 2001. Early detection of graft incompatibility in apricot (Prunus armeniaca) using in vitro techniques. Physiologia Plantarum 112: 135–141. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120118.x.10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1120118.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[FAOSTAT 2014. http://www.faostat.fao.org.]Search in Google Scholar
[Godeanu I., Baciu A., Achim G.H., Cosmulescu S. 2004. Achievements and perspectives in creating root-stocks and in the technology for obtaining grafted walnut trees in Romania. Acta Horticulturae 658: 479–486. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.658.71.10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.658.71]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Karadeniz T. 2003. Flavan content of annual shoots affects graft-take success in walnut (Juglans regia). South African Journal of Botany 69(3): 292–294. DOI: 10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30316-1.10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30316-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Karadeniz T. 2005. Relationships between graft success and climatic values in walnut (Juglans regia L.). Journal of Central European Agriculture 6: 631–634.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kasmi M., Rama P., Hodaj B., Kukali E., Rabeta A. 2013. Budding of walnut (Juglans regia L.). Albanian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 12(3): 465–469.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lichtenthaler H.K. 1987. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomemberanes. Methods in Enzymology 148: 350–382. DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1.10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lockard R.G., Schneider G.W. 1981. Stock and scion growth relationships and the dwarfing mechanism in apple. Horticultural Reviews 3: 315–375. DOI: 10.1002/9781118060766.ch7.10.1002/9781118060766.ch7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mng’omba S.A., du Toit E.S., Akinnifesi. F.K. 2008. The relationship between graft incompatibility and phenols in Uapaca kirkiana Müell Arg. Scientia Horticulturae 117: 212–218. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.03.031.10.1016/j.scienta.2008.03.031]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Paunović S.M., Miletić R., Mitrović M., Janković D. 2012. Graft-take success in walnut under controlled conditions and plant development in the nursery. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 40(2): 170–176. DOI: 10.15835/nbha4028145.10.15835/nbha4028145]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pinghai D., Rongting X. 1993. Effect of phenols on the survival of walnut grafting. Acta Horticulturae 311: 134–140. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.311.18.10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.311.18]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Reddy C.V., Melanta K.R. 1989. Effect of different scion varieties on the success of softwood grafting of mango in relation to phenols content. Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences 23: 341–343.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rezaee R., Vahdati K. 2008. Introducing a simple and efficient procedure for topworking Persian walnut trees. Journal of the American Pomological Society 62: 21–26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rezaee R., Vahdati K., Grigoorian V., Valizadeh M. 2008. Walnut grafting success and bleeding rate as affected by different grafting methods and seedling vigour. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 83: 94–99. DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2008.11512352.10.1080/14620316.2008.11512352]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rongting X., Pinghai D. 1990. Theory and practice of walnut grafting. Acta Horticulturae 284: 69–90. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1990.284.10.10.17660/ActaHortic.1990.284.10]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rongting X., Pinghai D. 1993. A study on the uniting process of walnut grafting and the factors affecting. Acta Horticulturae 311: 160–170. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.311.21.10.17660/ActaHortic.1993.311.21]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Soleimani A., Rabiei V., Hassani D., Amiri M.E. 2008. Effects of rootstock and cultivar on propagation of Persian walnut (Juglans regia L.) using hypocotyle grafting. Seed and Plant Production Journal 25(2): 93–101. [in Persian with English abstract]]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanisavljevic M., Mitrovic M. 1997. Effect of variety on successful grafting and development of nursery trees of walnut (Juglans regia L.). Acta Horticulturae 442: 281–284. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.442.42.10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.442.42]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Suk-In H., Moon-Ho L., Yong-Seok J. 2005. Study on the new vegetative propagation method ‘epicotyl grafting’ in walnut trees (Juglans spp.). Acta Horticulturae 705: 371–377. DOI: 10.17660/Acta-Hortic.2005.705.52.10.17660/Acta-Hortic.2005.705.52]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Thomas T.D. 2008. The role of activated charcoal in plant tissue culture. Biotechnology Advances 26: 618–631. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.08.003.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.08.00318786626]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Treutter D., Feucht W. 1988. Accumulation of the flavonoid prunin in Prunus avium/P. cerasus grafts and its possible involvement in the process of incompatibility. Acta Horticulturae 227: 74–78. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1988.227.6.10.17660/ActaHortic.1988.227.6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Usenik V., Štampar F. 2000. Influence of various root-stocks for cherries on p-coumaric acid, genistein and prunin content and their involvement in the in-compatibility process. Gartenbauwissenschaft 65: 245–250.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vahdati K., Zareie N. 2005. Evaluation of side-stub and hypocotyle grafting efficiency for walnut propagation in Iran. Acta Horticulturae 705: 347–351. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.705.47.10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.705.47]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zakinthinos G., Rouskas D. 1997. Specific treatments on walnut grafting improvement. Acta Horticulturae 442: 285–290. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.442.43.10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.442.43]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar