[AghaKouchak, A., 2014. Entropy-copula in hydrology and climatology. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 15, 2176–2189. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-13-0207.1.10.1175/JHM-D-13-0207.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Bačová Mitková, V., 2012. Vzájomný vzťah objemu a dĺžky trvania povodňových vĺn. [The relationship between volume of the flood wave and the time duration of flood events]. Acta Hydrologica Slovaca, 13, 1, 165–174. (In Slovak.)]Search in Google Scholar
[Bačová Mitková, V., Halmová, D., 2014. Joint modeling of flood peak discharges, volume and duration: a case study of the Danube River in Bratislava. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 62, 3, 186–196. doi:10.2478/johh-2014-0026.10.2478/johh-2014-0026]Search in Google Scholar
[Ben-Aissia, M.-A., Chebana, F., Ouarda, T.B.M.J., Roy, L., Desrochers, G., Chartier, I., Robichaud, É., 2012. Multivariate analysis of flood characteristics in a climate change context of the watershed of the Baskatong reservoir, Province of Québec, Canada. Hydrological Processes, 26, 130–142. doi:10.1002/hyp.8117.10.1002/hyp.8117]Search in Google Scholar
[Ben Aissia, M.-A., Chebana, F., Ouarda, T.B.M.J., Bruneau, P., Barbet, M., 2015. Bivariate index-flood model: case study in Québec, Canada. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60, 2, 247–268. doi:10.1080/02626667.2013.875177.10.1080/02626667.2013.875177]Search in Google Scholar
[Bezak, N., Mikoš, M., Šraj, M., 2014. Trivariate frequency analyses of peak discharge, hydrograph volume and suspended sediment concentration data using copulas. Water Resources Management, 28, 8, 2195–2212. doi:10.1007/s11269-014-0606-2.10.1007/s11269-014-0606-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Blöschl, G., Viglione, A., Merz, R., Parajka, J., Salinas, J.L., Schöner, W., 2011. Auswirkungen des Klimawandels auf Hochwasser und Niederwasser. [Climate impacts on floods and low flows]. Österreichische Wasser- und Abfallwirtschaft, 63, 1, 21–30. doi:10.1007/s00506-010-0269-z. (In German.)10.1007/s00506-010-0269-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, T.G., Maxwell, A.I., 1996. Baseflow separation—comparison of numerical methods with tracer experiments. In: 23rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium: Water and the Environment, Natl. Conf. Publ., 96/05, Inst. of Eng., Barton, A.C.T., Australia, pp. 539–545.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chebana, F., Ouarda, T.B.M.J., 2007. Multivariate L-moment homogeneity test. Water Resources Research, 43, W08406. doi:10.1029/2006WR005639.10.1029/2006WR005639]Search in Google Scholar
[Chebana, F., Ouarda, T.B.M.J., 2009. Index flood-based multivariate regional frequency analysis. Water Resources Research, 45, W10435. doi 10.1029/2008WR007490.10.1029/2008WR007490]Search in Google Scholar
[Chowdhary, H., Escobar, L.A., Singh, V.P., 2011. Identification of suitable copulas for bivariate frequency analysis of flood peak and flood volume data. Hydrology Research, 42, 2–3, 193–216. doi:10.2166/nh.2011.065.10.2166/nh.2011.065]Search in Google Scholar
[Dalrymple, T., 1960. Flood frequency analysis. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper, 1543-A, 80 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Favre, A.-C., El Adlouni, S., Perreault, L., Thiémonge, N., Bobée, B., 2004. Multivariate hydrological frequency analysis using copulas. Water Resources Research, 40, W01101. doi:10.1029/2003WR002456.10.1029/2003WR002456]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaál, L., Szolgay, J., Kohnová, S., Parajka, J., Merz, R., Viglione, A., Blöschl, G., 2012. Flood timescales: Understanding the interplay of climate and catchment processes through comparative hydrology. Water Resources Research, 48, 4, W04511. doi:10.1029/2011WR011509.10.1029/2011WR011509]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaál, L., Kohnová, S., Szolgay, J., 2013. Regional flood frequency analysis in Slovakia: Which pooling approach suits better? In: Klijn, F., Schweckendiek, T. (Eds.): Comprehensive Flood Risk Management: Research for Policy and Practice. London, CRC Press/Balkema, pp. 27–30.10.1201/b13715-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaál, L., Szolgay, J., Kohnová, S., Hlavčová, K., Parajka, J., Viglione, A., Merz, R., Blöschl, G., 2014. Dependence between flood peaks and volumes – A case study on climate and hydrological controls. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 60, 6, 968–984. doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.951361.10.1080/02626667.2014.951361]Search in Google Scholar
[Ganguli, P., Reddy, M.J., 2013. Probabilistic assessment of flood risks using trivariate copulas. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 111, 341–360. doi:10.1007/s00704-012-0664-4.10.1007/s00704-012-0664-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Genest, C., Favre, A.-C., 2007. Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12, 4, 47–368. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:4(347).10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:4(347)]Search in Google Scholar
[Genest, C., Rémillard, B., Beaudoin, D., 2009. Goodness-of-fit tests for copulas: A review and a power study. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 199–213. doi:10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.10.005.10.1016/j.insmatheco.2007.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Gräler, B., van den Berg, M.J., Vandenberghe, S., Petroselli, A., Grimaldi, S., De Baets, B., Verhoest, N.E.C., 2013. Multivariate return periods in hydrology: a critical and practical review focusing on synthetic design hydrograph estimation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 1281–1296. doi:10.5194/hess-17-1281-2013.10.5194/hess-17-1281-2013]Search in Google Scholar
[Grimaldi, S., Serinaldi, F., 2006. Asymmetric copula in multivariate flood frequency analysis. Advances in Water Resources, 29, 8, 1155–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.09.005.10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.09.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Grimaldi, S., Petroselli, A., Salvadori, G., De Michele, C., 2016. Catchment compatibility via copulas: A nonparametric study of the dependence structures of hydrological responses. Advances in Water Resources, 90, 116–133. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.02.003.10.1016/j.advwatres.2016.02.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R., 1997. Regional Frequency Analysis: An Approach Based on L-moments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.10.1017/CBO9780511529443]Search in Google Scholar
[IH, 1999. Flood Estimation Handbook. Institute of Hydrology: Wallingford, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Karmakar, S., Simonovic, S.P., 2009. Bivariate flood frequency analysis. Part 2: A copula-based approach with mixed marginal distributions. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 2, 32–44. doi:10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01020.x.10.1111/j.1753-318X.2009.01020.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Kendall, M.G., 1955. Rank Correlation Methods. Hafner Publishing, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kohnová, S., Szolgay, J., 1999. Regional estimation of design summer flood discharge in small catchments of northern Slovakia. In: Gottschalk, L., Olivry, C., Reed, D., Rosbjerg, D. (Eds.): Hydrological Extremes: Understanding, Predicting, Mitigating. IAHS publ. 255, IAHS Press, Wallingford, pp. 265–268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ljung, G.M., Box, G.E.P., 1978. On a measure of lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika, 65, 297–303. doi:10.1093/biomet/65.2.297.10.1093/biomet/65.2.297]Search in Google Scholar
[Merz, R., Blöschl, G., 2003. A process typology of regional floods. Water Resources Research, 39, 12, 1340–1347. doi:10.1029/2002WR001952.10.1029/2002WR001952]Search in Google Scholar
[Merz, R., Blöschl, G., 2009. A regional analysis of event runoff coefficients with respect to climate and catchment characteristics in Austria. Water Resources Research, 45, 1, W01415. doi:10.1029/2008WR007163.10.1029/2008WR007163]Search in Google Scholar
[Merz, R., Blöschl, G., Parajka, J., 2006. Spatio-temporal variability of event runoff coefficients. Journal of Hydrology, 331, 3–4, 591–604. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.008.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelsen, R.B., 2006. An Introduction to Copulas. 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Parajka, J., Merz, R., Blöschl, G., 2007. Uncertainty and multiple objective calibration in regional water balance modelling – Case study in 320 Austrian catchments. Hydrological Processes, 21, 435–446. doi:10.1002/hyp.6253.10.1002/hyp.6253]Search in Google Scholar
[Parajka, J., Kohnová, S., Bálint, G., Barbuc, M., Borga, M., Claps, P., Cheval, S., Dumitrescu, A., Gaume, E., Hlavčová, K., Merz, R., Pfaundler, M., Stancalie, G., Szolgay, J., Blöschl, G., 2010. Seasonal characteristics of flood regimes across the Alpine–Carpathian range. Journal of Hydrology, 394, 1–2, 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.015.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.015]Search in Google Scholar
[Pham, M.T., Vernieuwe, H., Baets, B.D., Willems, B., Verhoest, N.E.C., 2015. Stochastic simulation of precipitation-consistent daily reference evapotranspiration using vine copulas. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 18 p. doi: 10.1007/s00477-015-1181-7.10.1007/s00477-015-1181-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Poulin, A., Huard, D., Favre, A.-C., Pugin, S., 2007. Importance of tail dependence in bivariate frequency analysis. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 12, 4, 394–403. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:4(394).10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:4(394)]Search in Google Scholar
[Reddy, M.J., Ganguli, P., 2012. Bivariate flood frequency analysis of Upper Godavari River flows using Archimedean copulas. Water Resources Management, 26, 14, 3995–4018. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0124-z.10.1007/s11269-012-0124-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Remillard, B., Plante, J.-F., 2012. TwoCop: Nonparametric test of equality between two copulas. R package version 1.0 (19-10-2012). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/TwoCop.]Search in Google Scholar
[Remillard, B., Scaillet, O., 2009. Testing for equality between two copulas. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100, 377–386. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2008.05.004.10.1016/j.jmva.2008.05.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Requena, A.I., Chebana, F., Mediero, L., 2016. A complete procedure for multivariate index-flood model application. Journal of Hydrology, 535, 559–580. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.004.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosbjerg, D., Blöschl, G., Burn, D.H., Castellarin, A., Croke, B., DiBaldassarre, G., Iacobellis, V., Kjeldsen, T.R., Kuczera, G., Merz, R., Montanari, A., Morris, D., Ouarda, T.B.M.J., Ren, L., Rogger, M., Salinas, J.L., Toth, E., Viglione, A., 2013. Prediction of floods in ungauged basins. Chapter 9. In: Blöschl, G., Sivapalan, M., Wagener, T., Viglione, A., Savenije, H. (Eds.): Runoff Prediction in Ungauged Basins - Synthesis across Processes, Places and Scales. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 135–162.10.1017/CBO9781139235761.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Salinas, J.L., Castellarin, A., Viglione, A., Kohnová, S., Kjeldsen, T.R., 2014. Regional parent flood frequency distributions in Europe – Part 1: Is the GEV model suitable as a pan-European parent? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18, 4381–4389. doi:10.5194/hess-18-4381-2014.10.5194/hess-18-4381-2014]Search in Google Scholar
[Serinaldi, F., 2013. An uncertain journey around the tails of multivariate hydrological distributions. Water Resources Research, 49, 10, 6527–6547. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20531.10.1002/wrcr.20531]Search in Google Scholar
[Serinaldi, F., 2015. Can we tell more than we can know? The limits of bivariate drought analysis in the United States. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 14 p. doi:10.1007/s00477-015-1124-3.10.1007/s00477-015-1124-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Serinaldi, F., Kilsby, C.G., 2013. The intrinsic dependence structure of peak, volume, duration, and average intensity of hyetographs and hydrographs. Water Resources Research, 49, 3423–3442. doi:10.1002/wrcr.20221.10.1002/wrcr.20221430392425653461]Search in Google Scholar
[Shiau, J.-T., Wang, H.-Y., Tsai, C.-T., 2006. Bivariate flood frequency analysis of floods using copulas. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 42, 6, 1549–1564. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb06020.x.10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb06020.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Sraj, M., Bezak, N., Brilly, M., 2014. Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula function: a case study of the Litija station on the Sava River. Hydrological Processes, 29, 2, 225–238. doi:10.1002/hyp.10145.10.1002/hyp.10145]Search in Google Scholar
[Szolgay, J., Gaál, L., Bacigál, T., Kohnová, S., Hlavčová, K., Výleta, R., Blöschl, G., 2016. A regional look at the selection of a process-oriented model for flood peak/volume relationships. IAHS publ. 373. IAHS Press, Wallingford, pp. 61–69. doi: 10.5194/piahs-373-1-2016.10.5194/piahs-373-1-2016]Search in Google Scholar
[Szolgay, J., Gaál, L., Kohnová, S., Hlavčová, K., Výleta, R., Bacigál, T., Blöschl, G., 2015. A process-based analysis of the suitability of copula types for peak-volume flood relationships. Proc. IAHS, 370, 183–188. doi: 10.5194/piahs-370-183-2015.10.5194/piahs-370-183-2015]Search in Google Scholar
[Vernieuwe, H., Vandenberghe, S., De Baets, B., Verhoest, N.E.C., 2015. A continuous rainfall model based on vine copulas. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19, 6, 2685–2699. doi:10.5194/hess-19-2685-2015.10.5194/hess-19-2685-2015]Search in Google Scholar
[Werner, P.C., Gerstengarbe, F.-W., 2010. Katalog der Grosswetterlagen Europas (1881–2009) nach Paul Hess und Helmut Brezowsky, 7., verbesserte und ergänzte Auflage. [Catalog of Large Weather Conditions of Europe (1881-2009), after Paul Hess and Helmut Brezowsky, 7th, Improved and Completed Edition]. PIK-Report No. 119, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, 146 p. (In German.)]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, L., Singh, V.P., 2006. Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula method. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 11, 150–164. doi:10.1061/(asce)1084-0699(2006)11:2(150).10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2006)11:2(150)]Search in Google Scholar