Open Access

Accessibility concepts and indicators in transportation strategic planning issues: theoretical framework and literature review

   | Oct 18, 2016

Cite

1. A. Ribeiro, A.P. Antunes, and A. Páez, “Road accessibility and cohesion in lagging regions: empirical evidence from Portugal based on spatial econometric models”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 18, pp. 125–132, 2010.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.03.002Search in Google Scholar

2. B. Linneker, “Transport Infrastructure and Regional Economic Development in Europe: A Review of Theoretical and Methodological Approaches”, Report to SASI Project. TRP 133. Sheffield, Department of Town and Regional Planning, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

3. C. Koopmans, P. Rietveld, and A. Huijg, 2012. “An accessibility approach to railways and municipal population growth, 1840-1930”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 25, pp. 98-104, 2012.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.031Search in Google Scholar

4. C. Schürman, K. Spiekermann, and M. Wegener, “Accessibility indicators”. Berichte aus dem Institut für Raumplanung, 39, IRPUD, Dortmund, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

5. D. Biehl, (Ed.), “The Contribution of Infrastructure to Regional Development”, Final Report of the Infrastructure Studies Group to the Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1986.Search in Google Scholar

6. D. Biehl, “The role of infrastructure in regional development ”, In R.W. Vickerman (Ed.): Infrastructure and Regional Development, European Research in Regional Science, London, Pion, vol. 1, pp. 9-35, 1991.Search in Google Scholar

7. D. Keeble, J. Offord, and S. Walker, Peripheral Regions in a Community of Twelve Member States, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

8. D. Keeble, P.L. Owens, and C. Thompson, “Regional accessibility and economic potential in the European Community”, Regional Studies, vol. 16, pp. 419-432, 1982.10.1080/09595238200185421Search in Google Scholar

9. E. López, J. Gutiérrez, and G. Gómez, “Measuring regional cohesion effects of large-scale transport infrastructure investments: an accessibility approach”, European Planning Studies, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 277-301, 2008.10.1080/09654310701814629Search in Google Scholar

10. ESPON 1.2.1, Transport Services and Networks: Territorial Trends and Basic Supply of Infrastructure for Territorial Cohesion, Final Report, Tours: University of Tours, http://www.espon.eu., 2005.Search in Google Scholar

11. F. Bruinsma, and P. Rietveld, “Urban agglomerations in European infrastructure networks”, Urban Studies, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 919–934, 1993.10.1080/00420989320080861Search in Google Scholar

12. F.P. van den Heuvel, L. Rivera, K. H. van Donselaar, A. de Jong, Y. Sheffi, P.W. de Langen, and J. C. Fransoo,“Relationship between freight accessibility and logistics employment in US counties”, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 59, pp. 91–105, 2014.10.1016/j.tra.2013.11.002Search in Google Scholar

13. G. Chi, “The impacts of highway expansion on population change: an integrated spatial approach”, Rural Sociology, vol. 75, no. 1, pp. 58–89, 2010.10.1111/j.1549-0831.2009.00003.xSearch in Google Scholar

14. G. Chi, “The impacts of transport accessibility on population change across rural, suburban and urban areas: a case study of Wisconsin at sub-county levels”, Urban Studies, vol. 49, pp. 2711–2731, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

15. G. Törnqvist, “Contact Systems and Regional Development“, Lund Studies in Geography B vol. 35. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup, 1970.Search in Google Scholar

16. J. Berechman, “Urban and regional economic impacts of transportation investment: a critical assessment and proposed methodology“, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 28, no.4, pp. 351–362, 1994.10.1016/0965-8564(94)90009-4Search in Google Scholar

17. J. Berechman, and R. Paaswell, “Accessibility improvements and local employment: an empirical analysis”, Journal of Transportation Statistics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 49–66, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

18. J. Berechmen, D. Ozmen, and K. Ozbay, “Empirical analysis of transportation investment and economic development at state, county and municipality levels”, Transportation, vol. 33, pp. 537–551, 2006.10.1007/s11116-006-7472-6Search in Google Scholar

19. J. Bröcker, and K. Peschel, Trade. In W. Molle, R. Cappelin, (Eds.), Regional Impact of Community Policies in Europe, Aldershot: Avebury,1988.Search in Google Scholar

20. C. Martín, J. Gutiérrez, and C. Román, “Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Index to Measure the Accessibility Impacts of New Infrastructure Investments: The Case of the High-speed Train Corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French Border”, Regional Studies, vol. 38, no 6, pp. 697 – 712, 2004.10.1080/003434042000240987Search in Google Scholar

21. J. Gutiérrez, “Location, economic potential and daily accessibility: an analysis border”. Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 229–242, 2001.10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5Search in Google Scholar

22. J. Gutiérrez, A. Condeço-Melhorado, and J. C. Martín, “Using accessibility indicators and GIS to assess spatial spillovers of transport infrastructure investment”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 18, pp. 141-152, 2010.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.12.003Search in Google Scholar

23. J. Gutiérrez, R. González, and G.Gómez, “The European high-speed train network: predicted effects on accessibility patterns”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 4, pp. 227–238, 1996.10.1016/S0966-6923(96)00033-6Search in Google Scholar

24. J. M. Morris, P.L. Dumble, and M.R. Wigan, “Accessibility indicators for transportation planning”, Transportation Research A, vol. 13, pp. 91–109, 1979.10.1016/0191-2607(79)90012-8Search in Google Scholar

25. K. Ozbay, D. Ozmen, and J. Berechman, “Modeling and analysis of the link between accessibility and employment growth”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 132, no. 5, pp. 385–393, 2006.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:5(385)Search in Google Scholar

26. K. Spiekermann, and M. Wegener, “Trans-European Networks and unequal accessibility in Europe”, European Journal of Regional Development, vol. 4, pp. 35-42, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

27. K.T. Geurs, and B. van Wee, “Accessibility of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 12, pp. 127–140, 2004.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005Search in Google Scholar

28. K.T. Geurs, and J.R. Ritsema van Eck, “Accessibility measures: review and applications”, RIVM Report 408505 006, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

29. M. Wegener, H. Eskelinnen, F. Fürst, C. Schürmann, and K. Spiekermann, “Criteria for the Spatial Differentiation of the EU Territory: Geographical Position”, Forschungen 102.2, Bonn: Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

30. P. Gould, “Spatial Diffusion”, Resource Paper No. 17, Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers, 1969.Search in Google Scholar

31. P. Jiwattanakulpaisarn, R.P. Noland, and D.J. Graham, “Causal linkages between highways and sector-level employment”, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 44, pp. 265–280, 2010.10.1016/j.tra.2010.01.008Search in Google Scholar

32. R.J. Johnston, D. Gregory, G. Pratt, and M. Watts, The Dictionary of Human Geography, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

33. R. Thompson, and E. Taniguchi, “City logistics and freight transport”, In: A.M. Brewer, K.J. Button, D.A. Hensher, (Eds.), The Handbook of Logistics and Supply-Chain Management, Handbooks in Transport, no 2. Pergamon, Elsevier, London, pp. 393–404, 2001.10.1108/9780080435930-025Search in Google Scholar

34. R. W. Vickerman, “Accessibility, attraction, and potential: a review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility”, Environment and Planning A vol. 6, pp. 675–691, 1974.10.1068/a060675Search in Google Scholar

35. R.W. Vickerman, Introduction. In R.W. Vickerman (ed.), Infrastructure and Regional Development, London: Pion, pp. 1-8, 1991a.Search in Google Scholar

36. S.L. Handy, and D.A. Niemeier, “Measuring Accessibility: An Exploration of Issues and Alternatives”, Environment and Planning A, vol. 29, pp. 1175–94, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

37. S. Karou, and A. Hull, “Accessibility modelling: predicting the impact of planned transport infrastructure on accessibility patterns in Edinburgh, UK”, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 35, pp. 1–11, 2014.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.002Search in Google Scholar

38. Study Programme on European Spatial Planning Working Group, 1.1 GEOGRAPHICAL POSITION Final Report Part 1, Prepared by the National Focal Points of Finland, France and Germany Draft 12, January 2000.Search in Google Scholar

39. T. Kramberger, V. Potočan, & V. M. Ipavec, Sustainable Logistics and Strategic Transportation Planning, University of Maribor, Slovenia, pp. 248-272, ISBN13: 9781522500018; EISBN13: 9781522500025, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-0001-8.ch012, 2016.10.4018/978-1-5225-0001-8.ch012Search in Google Scholar

40. U. Blum, “Effects of transportation investments on regional growth: a theoretical and empirical investigation”, Regional Science Association vol. 49, pp. 169-184, 1982.10.1007/BF01939882Search in Google Scholar

41. J. Hong, “Transport and the location of foreign logistics firms: the Chinese experience”, Transportation Research Part A, vol. 41, pp. 597–609, 2007.10.1016/j.tra.2006.11.004Search in Google Scholar