Open Access

CEDAW in the Eyes of the United States


Cite

1. Concerned for Women Legislative Action Committee, “CEDAW Harms Families”, May 7, 2010, Beverly LaHaye Institute, https://concernedwomen.org/cedaw-harmsfamilies/, viewed on 2/10/2017.Search in Google Scholar

2. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by the General Assembly Resolution 34/180 December 1979, entered into force on 3 September 1981, UN Treaty Series, Vol. 1249.Search in Google Scholar

3. Courtney Goldsworthy, “Why the United States Has Failed to Ratify the CEDAW: A Look at Purported Problems with Ratification”, Michigan State University, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

4. Christina Sommers, “Feminism by Treaty” Policy Review no. 167, (2011) 37-50.Search in Google Scholar

5. David Auerswald, and Maltzman Forrest, “Policymaking Through Advice and Consent: Treaty Consideration by the United States Senate.” Journal of Politics, Vol. 65 (4), 2003.10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00127Search in Google Scholar

6. Devaki Jain, Women, Development, and the UN: A Sixty-Year Quest for Equality and Justice, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

7. “Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW): Issues in the U.S. Ratification Debate.” Congressional Research Service, (2001), 7-5700.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ed Pilkington, “US criticized by UN for human rights failings on NSA, guns and drones”. The Guardian. April 2, 2014Search in Google Scholar

9. F.Martin, International Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, Cambridge University Press, 2006.10.1017/CBO9780511808746Search in Google Scholar

10. Jamil Dakwar, “U.S. Human Rights Record Undergoes International Scrutiny”. American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), April 2, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

11. Julia Schast, “Battle of the Sexes: Why the United States Has Not Yet Ratified the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW)”, Elon University, http://www.elon.edu/eweb/academics/writing_excellence/contest/Contest%20Entry%20Schast%20Research%20Essay.xhtml, Viewed on 3/10/2017.Search in Google Scholar

12. Julie Minor, “An analysis of structural Weaknesses in the Convention of the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women”, 24 Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law, 137-153, (1997).Search in Google Scholar

13. Kavita Ramdas and Kelly Janus Kathleen, “Ratifying Women’s Rights.” Policy Review no. 169, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

14. Lynn Walter, Women’s Rights: A Global View, Westport: Greenwood Press, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

15. Malvina Halberstam, “The United States Ratification on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women”, 31(1) George Washington Journal of International Law & Economy, 49-96, (1997).Search in Google Scholar

16. Penny Wakefield, “CEDAW Ratification: Back Seated Once Again “ Washington & Lee Law School Human Rights 37(3), 2010.Search in Google Scholar

17. Rebecca Cook, “State Accountability Under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, in Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

18. Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on its Eighteenth Session, General Assembly Official Records, Supplement No. 38 (A/ 53/ 38/ Rev.1), 1998.Search in Google Scholar

19. Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on its Twentieth Session, General Assembly Official Records, Supplement No. 38 (A/ 54/ 38/ Rev.1), 1999.Search in Google Scholar

20. Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on its Twenty Second Session, General Assembly Official Records, Supplement No. 38 (A/ 55/ 38), 2000.Search in Google Scholar

21. Report of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women on its Twenty Fourth Session, General Assembly Official Records, Supplement No. 38 (A/ 56/ 38), 2001.Search in Google Scholar

22. Susan Yoshihara, “Does CEDAW Promote Abortion?”, Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute, 2010Search in Google Scholar

23. Thaler Kai, “50 years ago today, American diplomats endorsed mass killings in Indonesia. Here’s what that means for today”, The Washington Post, December 24, 2015.Search in Google Scholar

24. Todd Landman, Protecting Human Rights: A Comparative Study, Georgetown University Press, 2005.Search in Google Scholar

25. Trymaine Lee, “UN watchdog condemns US for human rights failures”. MSNBC, April 2, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

26. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division of Social Policy and Development, “International Norms and Standards Relating to Disability”, (2003-2004), http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/comp101.htm, Viewed on 3/10/2017.Search in Google Scholar

27. UN General Assembly, Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), Resolution 34/180) December 18, 1979), General Recommendation 24.Search in Google Scholar

28. UN Report of the World Conference of the International Women’s Year, Mexico City, 19 June-2 July 1975.Search in Google Scholar

29. U.S. Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Pub.L. 88–352, 78 Stat. 241, enacted July 2, 1964).Search in Google Scholar

30. U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. 2002. “Treaty Doc. 96-53, “ Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations. 107th Congress, 2nd Session. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington. http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senateSearch in Google Scholar

31. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, registered on 27 Jan 1969, entered into force on 27 Jan 1980, UN Treaty series, Vol. 1155.Search in Google Scholar

32. William Gould, Agenda for Reform: The Future of Employment Relationships and the Law, MIT Press, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2392-7054
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
2 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Law, Commercial Law, other, Law of Civil Procedure, Voluntary Jurisdiction, Public Law, Criminal Law