Utilizing a Photo-Analysis Software for Content Identifying Method (CIM)

Anderson, L. M., & Schroeder, H. W. (1983). Application of wildland scenic assessment methods to the urban landscape. Landscape Planning, 10, 219-237.10.1016/0304-3924(83)90049-7Search in Google Scholar

Arriaza, M, Canas-Ortega, J. F., Canas-Madueno, J. A., & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 115-125.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029Search in Google Scholar

Bernaldez, F.G., Ruiz, J.P., Benayas, J., and Abello, R.P. (1998). Real landscapes versus photographed landscapes: preference dimensions. Landscape Resources, 13, 10-11.10.1080/01426398808706244Search in Google Scholar

Beza, B. (2010). The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A study of the Mt. Everest Trek. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97, 306-317.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Bishop, I. D. (1997). Testing perceived landscape colour difference using the Internet. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37, 187-196.10.1016/S0169-2046(97)80003-5Search in Google Scholar

Brown, T. C., & Daniel, T. C. (1986). Predicting Scenic Beauty of Timber Stands. Forest Science, 32, 417-487.Search in Google Scholar

Buhyoff, G. J., Gauthier, L. J., and Wellman, J. D. (1984). Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurements. Forest Science, 30(1), 71-82.Search in Google Scholar

Cañas, I., Ayuga, E., and Ayuga, F. (2009). A contribution to the assessment of scenic quality of landscapes based on preferences expressed by the public. Land Use Policy, 26, 1173-1181.10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.02.007Search in Google Scholar

Daniel, T. C. (1990). Measuring the quality of the human environment: a psychophysical approach. American Psychologist, 45, 633-637.10.1037/0003-066X.45.5.633Search in Google Scholar

Daniel, T. C., (2001). Whither scenic beauty? visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape Urban Planning, 25, 267-281.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4Search in Google Scholar

Daniel, T. C., & Boster, R. S. (1976). Measuring landscape aesthetics: the scenic beauty estimation method. USDA Forest Service, 167, 66-69.Search in Google Scholar

Daniel, T. C., & Vining, J. (1983). Methodological issues in the assessment of landscape quality. In Altman, I., & Wohwill, J. F. (Eds.), Behaviour and the Natural Environment (pp. 39-83.). New York: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar

Español, I. (1995). Impacto Ambiental (Environmental Impact). Canales y Puertos, Madrid: E.T.S.I. Caminos.Search in Google Scholar

García, M. L., Hernańdez, B. J., and Ayuga, F. (2003). Analysis of the exterior colour of agroindustrial buildings: a computer aided approach to landscape integration. Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 93-104.10.1016/S0301-4797(03)00121-XSearch in Google Scholar

Gottemoeller, F. (2004). Bridgescape: The Art of Designing Bridge. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Groat, L. (1984). Public opinions of contextual fit. Architecture, 11, 72-75.Search in Google Scholar

Hagerhall, C. M., Purcell, T. and Taylor, R. (2004). Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference, J. Environ. Psychol. 24, 247-255.10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Hammitt, W. E., Patterson, M. E., and Noe, F. P. (1994). Identifying and predicting visual preference of southern Appalachian forest recreation vistas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 29, 171-183.10.1016/0169-2046(94)90026-4Search in Google Scholar

Herzog, T. R. (1989). A cognitive analysis of preference for urban nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 27-43.10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80024-6Search in Google Scholar

Hull, R. B., & Revell, G. R. (1988). Cross-cultural comparison of landscape scenic beauty evaluations: a case study in Bali. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9, 177-191.10.1016/S0272-4944(89)80033-7Search in Google Scholar

Hull, R.B. & Stewart, W.P. (1992). Validity of photo-based scenic beauty judgments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 101-114.10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80063-5Search in Google Scholar

Hull, R. B. & Harvey, A. (1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and behavior, 21(3), 323-345. Kaltenborn, B. P. & Bjerke, T. (2002). Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59, 1-11.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and environment: Functioning in an nncertain World. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. and Wendt, J. S. (1972). Rated preference and complexity for natural and urban Material. Perception Psychophysics, 12(4), 354-356.10.3758/BF03207221Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. (1977). Preference and everyday nature: method and application. In: Stokols, D. (Ed.), Perspectives on Environmental Behavior -Theory, Research and Applications (pp. 235-250). New York: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, R. (1983). The role of nature in the urban context. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohwill (Eds.), Behavior and Natural Environment (pp. 127-162). New York: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, R., & Herbert, E. J. (1987). Cultural and sub-cultural comparisons in preferences for natural settings. Landscape and Urban Planning, 14, 281-293.10.1016/0169-2046(87)90040-5Search in Google Scholar

Kenwick, R.A., Shammin, Md. R. and Sullivan, W.C. (2009). Preferences for riparian buffers. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 88-96.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.12.005Search in Google Scholar

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.10.1177/001316447003000308Search in Google Scholar

Law, C. S., & Zube, E. H. (1983). Effects of photographic composition on landscape perception. Landscape Resources, 8, 22-23.10.1080/01426398308706052Search in Google Scholar

Lekagul, A. (2002). A preference study of the traditional Thai Market Place: A management and preservation tool for vernacular environments. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.Search in Google Scholar

Leonhardt, F. (1984). Bridges: Aesthetics and Design. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Leonhardt, F. (2001). Bridge Engineering Handbook. In Wai-Fah Chen, & Lian Duan (Eds), Bridge Aesthetics Basics (chapter 2). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar

Listavich, S. T. (1995). The development of aesthetic guidelines for short and medium span Texas bridge systems. Unpublished Master’s thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.Search in Google Scholar

Magill, A. W., & Litton, R. B. J. (1986). A color measuring system for landscape assessment. Landscape Journal, 5(1), 45-54.10.3368/lj.5.1.45Search in Google Scholar

Menn, C. (1986). Prestressed Concrete Bridges. Wien: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, P. A. (1984). Visual Preference and Implications for Coastal Management: A Perceptual Study of the British Colombia Shoreline. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Search in Google Scholar

Minnesota Department of Transportation. Office of Technical Support, Site Development Unit (1995). Architectural and Visual Quality Design Recommendations, for the T.H. 610 Transportation Corridors.Search in Google Scholar

Nasar, J. L. (1997). The Evaluative Image of the City. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Pitt, D., G., & Zube, E. H. (1987). Management of Natural Environments. In Stokols, D., Altman, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp.1009-1042). New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Reese, R. C. (1976). Aesthetic is a do it yourself project. Methods of Structural Analysis, (ASCE), 1, 33-38. Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A. and Hejazi, E. (2000). Research methods in behavioral science. Tehran. Iran: Agah Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sayadi, S., González-Roa, M. C., and Calatrava-Requena, J. (2009). Public preferences for landscape features: the case of agricultural landscape in mountainous Mediterranean areas. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 334-344.10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.04.003Search in Google Scholar

Schroeder, H. W. (1986). Estimating park trees densities to maximize landscape aesthetics. Journal of Environmental Management, 23(4), 325-333.Search in Google Scholar

Shafer, E. L. (1969). Perception of natural environment. Environment and Behavior, 1, 71-82.10.1177/001391656900100105Search in Google Scholar

Shafer, E. L., & Brush, R. O. (1977). How to measure preferences for photographs of natural landscapes. Landscape Planning, 4, 237-256.10.1016/0304-3924(77)90027-2Search in Google Scholar

Sheets, V. L., & Manzer, C. D. (1991). Affect, cognition, and urban vegetation some effects of adding trees along city streets. Environment and Behavior, 23(3), 285-304.10.1177/0013916591233002Search in Google Scholar

Shuttleworth, S., (1980). The use of photographs as an environmental presentation medium in landscape studies. Journal of Environmental Management, 11, 61-76.Search in Google Scholar

Stamps, A. E. (1999). Demographic effects in environmental aesthetics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 14, 155-175.10.1177/08854129922092630Search in Google Scholar

Stamps, A. E. & Miller, S. D. (1993). Advocacy membership, design guidelines, and predicting preferences for residential infill designs. Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 367-409.10.1177/0013916593255004Search in Google Scholar

Stewart, T. R., Middleton, P., Downton, M., Ely, D. (1984). Judgments of photographs vs. field observations in studies of perception and judgment of the visual environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4, 283-302.10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80001-8Search in Google Scholar

Svobodova, K., Sklenicka, P., Molnarova, K. and Salek, M. (2012). Visual preferences for physical attributes of mining and post-mining landscapes with respect to the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents. Ecological Engineering, 43, 34-44.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.08.007Search in Google Scholar

Wherrett, J. R. (2000). Creating landscape preference models using the internet as a medium for surveys. Landscape Resources, 25, 79-96.10.1080/014263900113181Search in Google Scholar

Woods, J. D. (1995). Environmental factors that influence preference and price perceptions of commercial landscapes and storefronts. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, K. (1995). Cultural variations in landscape preference: comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and Western design experts. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32, 107-126.10.1016/0169-2046(94)00188-9Search in Google Scholar

Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L. & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9, 1-33.10.1016/0304-3924(82)90009-0Search in Google Scholar

Zuk, W. (1973). Public response to bridge colors. Department of Highways and the University of Virginia, Virginia Highway Research Council: Charlottesville, VA. Search in Google Scholar