Cite

1. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. CCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1864-1894.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.07.00521087721Search in Google Scholar

2. Buth J, Disselhoff B, Sommeling C, Stam L. Color-flow duplex criteria for grading stenosis in infrainguinal vein grafts. J Vasc Surg. 1991;14:716-726.10.1067/mva.1991.329661960803Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Sun Z, Ng KH. Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG-gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28:2109-2119.10.1007/s10554-011-0006-022212661Search in Google Scholar

4. Sun Z, Choo GH, Ng KH. Coronary CT angiography: current status and continuing challenges. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:495-510.10.1259/bjr/15296170347987322253353Search in Google Scholar

5. Sun Z. Multislice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: Technical developments, radiation dose and diagnostic value. World J Cardiol. 2010;2:333-343.10.4330/wjc.v2.i10.333299883221160611Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Paul JF, Abada HT. Strategies for reduction of radiation dose in cardiac multislice CT. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2028.10.1007/s00330-007-0584-317318604Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277-84.10.1056/NEJMra07214918046031Search in Google Scholar

8. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA. 2009;301:500-507.10.1001/jama.2009.5419190314Search in Google Scholar

9. Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, et al. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA. 2009;301:2340-2348.10.1001/jama.2009.81419509381Search in Google Scholar

10. Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, et al. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:198-224.10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.001339102621723512Search in Google Scholar

11. Sun Z, Ng K H. Multislice CT angiography in cardiac imaging. Part III: radiation risk and dose reduction. Singapore Med J. 2010;51:374-380.Search in Google Scholar

12. De Geer J, Sandborg M, Smedby O, Persson A. The efficacy of 2D, nonlinear noise reduction filtering in cardiac imaging: A pilot study. Acta Radiologica. 2011;52:716-722.10.1258/ar.2011.10051121852437Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13. Bischoff B, Hein F, Meyer T, et al. Impact of a reduced tube voltage on CT angiography and radiation dose: Results of the PROTECTION I study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:940-946.10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.02.01519679281Search in Google Scholar

14. Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, et al. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:198-224.10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.001339102621723512Search in Google Scholar

15. Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenosis: First experience. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:2896-2903.10.1007/s00330-009-1618-919760229Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L, et al. Low-dose, 128-slice, dual-source CT coronary angiography: Accuracy and radiation dose of the high-pitch and the step-and-shoot mode. Heart. 2010;96:933-938.10.1136/hrt.2009.18910020538669Search in Google Scholar

17. Wagner M, Butler C, Rief M, et al. Comparison of non-gated vs. electrocardiogram-gated 64-detector-row computed tomography for integrated electroanatomic mapping in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2010;12:1090-1097.10.1093/europace/euq13520525729Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: Reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1081-1086.10.1007/s00330-001-1278-x11976849Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Wintersperger B, Jakobs T, Herzog P, et al. Aorto-iliac multidetector-row CT angiography with low kV settings:improved vessel enhancement and simultaneous reduction of radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:334-341.10.1007/s00330-004-2575-y15611872Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Halliburton SS, Abbara S, Chen MY, et al. SCCT guidelines on radiation dose and dose-optimization strategies in cardiovascular CT. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2011;5:198-224.10.1016/j.jcct.2011.06.001Search in Google Scholar

21. Hopper KD, King SH, Lobell ME, et al. The breast: In-plane x-ray protection during diagnostic thoracic CT — shielding with bismuth radioprotective garments. Radiology. 1997;205:853-858.10.1148/radiology.205.3.93935479393547Search in Google Scholar

22. Fricke BL, Donnelly LF, Frush DP, et al. In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: Effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:407-411.10.2214/ajr.180.2.180040712540443Search in Google Scholar

23. DeFrance T, Dubois E, Gebow D, et al. Helical prospective ECG-gating in cardiac computed tomography: Radiation dose and image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;26:99-107.10.1007/s10554-009-9522-619898955Search in Google Scholar

24. Abada HT, Larchez C, Daoud B, et al. MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:S387-S390.10.2214/AJR.05.021616714613Search in Google Scholar

25. Jakobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B, et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective EKG gating: reduction of radiation exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1081-1086.10.1007/s00330-001-1278-x11976849Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

26. Xu L, Zhang Z. Coronary CT angiography with low radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;26:17-25.10.1007/s10554-009-9576-520058080Search in Google Scholar

27. Starck G, Lonn L, Cederblad A, Forssell-Aronsson E, Sjostrom L, Alpsten M. A method to obtain the same levels of CT image noise for patients of various sizes, to minimize radiation dose. Br J Radiol. 2002;75:140-150.10.1259/bjr.75.890.75014011893638Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

28. Sigal-Cinqualbre AB, Hennequin R, Abada HT, Chen X, Paul JF. Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest CT in adults: feasibility and effecton image quality and iodine dose. Radiology. 2004;231:169-174.10.1148/radiol.231103019115068946Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2501-8132
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, other, Internal Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medicine and Intensive-Care Medicine