Cardiac Computed Tomography Assessment in Acute Coronary Syndromes — Do We Have Time for It in Emergency Settings?

1. Prazeres CE, Cury RC, Carneiro AC, Rochitte CE. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in the Assessment of Acute Chest Pain in the Emergency Room. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia. 2013;101:562-569.10.5935/abc.20130208410681524145392Search in Google Scholar

2. Sato Y, Imazeki T, Inoue F, et al. Detection of atherosclerotic coronary artery plaques by multislice computed tomography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: Report of 2 cases. Circ J. 2004;68:263-266.10.1253/circj.68.263Search in Google Scholar

3. Litt H, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1393-1403.10.1056/NEJMoa1201163Search in Google Scholar

4. Boden WE, Shah PK, Gupta V, Ohman EM. Contemporary approach to the diagnosis and management of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;50:311-351.10.1016/j.pcad.2007.11.003Search in Google Scholar

5. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2008;117(4):e25-e146.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187998Search in Google Scholar

6. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095-2128.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61728-0Search in Google Scholar

7. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2197-2223.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4Search in Google Scholar

8. Prazeres CE, Cury RC, Carneiro AC, Rochitte CE. Coronary computed tomography angiography in the assessment of acute chest pain in the emergency room. Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia. 2013;101:562-569.10.5935/abc.20130208Search in Google Scholar

9. Gilard M, Le Gal G, Cornily JC, et al. Midterm prognosis of patients with suspected coronary artery disease and normal multislice computed tomographic findings: a prospective management outcome study. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:1686-1689.10.1001/archinte.167.15.168617698693Search in Google Scholar

10. Abdulla J, Abildstrom SZ, Gotzsche O, Christensen E, Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C. 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:3042-3050.10.1093/eurheartj/ehm46617981829Search in Google Scholar

11. Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, et al. 64-Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2008;94:1386-1393.10.1136/hrt.2008.14529218669550Search in Google Scholar

12. Mowatt G, Cummins E, Waugh N, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of coronary artery disease. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12:iii-iv,ix-143.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P, et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1896-1910.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.02817084268Search in Google Scholar

14. Hamon M, Morello R, Riddell JW. Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography-meta-analysis. Radiology. 2007;245:720-731.10.1148/radiol.245306189917951354Search in Google Scholar

15. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724-1732.10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.03119007693Search in Google Scholar

16. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:2135-2144.10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.05819095130Search in Google Scholar

17. Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA, et al. 64-Slice CT coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Heart. 2007;93:1386-1392.10.1136/hrt.2006.112771201688917344332Search in Google Scholar

18. Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F, et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation. 2006;114:2251-2260.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.63480817075011Search in Google Scholar

19. Hoffmann U, Bamberg F, Chae CU, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1642-1650.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.052274776619406338Search in Google Scholar

20. Motoyama S, Kondo T, Sarai M, et al. Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:319-326.10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.04417659199Search in Google Scholar

21. Kornowski R, Mehran R, Dangas G, et al. Prognostic impact of staged versus “one-time” multivessel percutaneous interventions in acute myocardial infarction: analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:704-711.10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.07121816305Search in Google Scholar

22. Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2909-2945.10.1093/eurheartj/ehn41619004841Search in Google Scholar

23. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Ross MA, O’Neil BJ, Raff GL. A randomized controlled trial of multislice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:863-871.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.06417320744Search in Google Scholar

24. Goldstein JA, Chinnaiyan KM. Abidov A, et al. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1414-1422.10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.06821939822Search in Google Scholar

25. Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:299-308.10.1056/NEJMoa1201161366221722830462Search in Google Scholar

26. Hulten E, Pickett C, Bittencourt MS, et al. Outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:880-892.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.06123395069Search in Google Scholar

27. Frauenfelder T, Appenzeller P, Karlo C, et al. Triple rule-out CT in the emergency department: protocols and spectrum of imaging findings. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:789-799.10.1007/s00330-008-1231-319015860Search in Google Scholar