Myocardial Fibrosis and the Risk of Recurrence in Atrial Fibrillation

1. Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG. Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:469-473.10.1001/archinte.1995.00430050045005Search in Google Scholar

2. Jaïs P, Cauchemez B, Macle L, et al. Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs for atrial fibrillation: the A4 study. Circulation. 2008;118:2498-2505.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.772582Search in Google Scholar

3. Pappone C, Augello G, Sala S, et al. A randomized trial of circumferential pulmonary vein ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: the APAF Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2340-2347.10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.037Search in Google Scholar

4. Casaclang-Verzosa G, Gersh BJ, Tsang TS. Structural and functional remodeling of the left atrium: clinical and therapeutic implications for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1-1110.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.026Search in Google Scholar

5. Pappone C, Santinelli V, Manguso F, et al. Pulmonary vein denervation enhances long-term benefit after circumferential ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004;109:327-334.10.1161/01.CIR.0000112641.16340.C7Search in Google Scholar

6. Ganesan AN, Shipp NJ, Brooks AG, et al. Long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e004549.10.1161/JAHA.112.004549Search in Google Scholar

7. Ausma J, Wijffels M, Thone F, Wouters L, Allessie M, Borgers M. Structural changes of atrial myocardium due to sustained atrial fibrillation in the goat. Circulation. 1997;96:3157-3163.10.1161/01.CIR.96.9.3157Search in Google Scholar

8. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints and research trial design. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;33:171-257.10.1007/s10840-012-9672-7Search in Google Scholar

9. Cosedis Nielsen J, JohannessenA, Raatikainen P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1587-1595.10.1056/NEJMoa1113566Search in Google Scholar

10. Badger TJ, Daccarett M, Akoum NW, et al. Evaluation of Left Atrial Lesions after Initial and Repeat Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Lessons learned from Delayed-Enhancement MRI in Repeat Ablation Procedures. Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology. 2010;3:249-259.10.1161/CIRCEP.109.868356Search in Google Scholar

11. Wilber DJ, Pappone C, Neuzil P, et al. Comparison of antiarrhythmic drug therapy and radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303:333-340.10.1001/jama.2009.2029Search in Google Scholar

12. Dewire J, Khurram IM, Pashakhanloo F, et al. The Association of Pre-Existing Left Atrial Fibrosis with Clinical Variables in Patients Referred for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology. 2014;8(Suppl1):25-30.10.4137/CMC.S15036Search in Google Scholar

13. Bisbal F, Guiu E, Cabanas P, et al. Reversal of spherical remodelling of the left atrium after pulmonary vein isolation: incidence and predictors. Europace. 2014;16(6):840-7.10.1093/europace/eut385Search in Google Scholar

14. Narayan SM, Krummen DE, Clopton P, Shivkumar K, Miller JM. Direct or coincidental elimination of stable rotors or focal sources may explain successful atrial fibrillation ablation: on-treatment analysis of the CONFIRM trial (Conventional ablation for AF with or without focal impulse and rotor modulation). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:138-147.10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.021Search in Google Scholar

15. Harrison JL, Sohns C, Linton NW, et al. Repeat left atrial catheter ablation: cardiac magnetic resonance prediction of endocardial voltage and gaps in ablation lesion sets. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8:270-278.10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002066Search in Google Scholar

16. Nazarian S, Kolandaivelu A, Zviman MM, et al. Feasibility of real-time magnetic resonance imaging for catheter guidance in electrophysiology studies. Circulation. 2008;118:223-229.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.742452Search in Google Scholar

17. Sommer P, Grothoff M, Eitel C, et al. Feasibility of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-guided electrophysiology studies in humans. Europace. 2013:15:101-108.10.1093/europace/eus230Search in Google Scholar