[Aageson, T.H. (2008). Cultural Entrepreneurs: Producing Cultural Value and Wealth. The Cultures and Globalization Series: The Cultural Economy. London: Sage Publications, pp. 92-107.10.4135/9781446247174.n8]Search in Google Scholar
[AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard (2015). [Accessed 20.02.2016]. Available from http://www.accountability.org/standards/aa1000ses.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Baggio, R., Klobas, J. (2011). Quantitative Methods in Tourism: A Handbook. Aspects of Tourism Series. Bristol, UK: Channel View, p. 255.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumol, W.J. (1993). Formal Entrepreneurship Theory of economics: Existence and Bounds. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, pp.197-210.10.1016/0883-9026(93)90027-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumol, W.J. (2003). On Austrian analysis of entrepreneurship and my own. Austrian Economics and Entrepreneurial studies. UK: Elsevier Science, pp.57-66.10.1016/S1529-2134(03)06004-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Brannen, J. (2004). Working qualitatively and quantitatively. Qualitative Research Practice. Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J.F., Silverman, D. (eds.). London: Sage Publication, pp. 312-326.10.4135/9781848608191.d25]Search in Google Scholar
[Carroll, A.B. (1996). Business and Society - Ethics and Stakeholder Management (3rd ed.). Cinncinati:South - Western Publishing, p. 560.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, L., Manion, L. (1994). Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge, pp. 718.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deakins, D. (1996). Entrepreneurship and small firms. London: McGraw-Hill, p. 248.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, R.E. (2010). Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 279.10.1017/CBO9781139192675]Search in Google Scholar
[Gill, J., Johnson, P. (2010).Research methods for managers. Los Angeles: Sage, p. 270.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haagoort, G. (2000). Arts management entrepreneurial style. Eburon: Delft, pp. 214-215.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harrison, J.S., Freeman, R.E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility and performance: empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 4 (5), pp. 479-485.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hoks, Dž. (2007). Ilgstpējīgas attīstības 4. pīlārs. Kultūras nozīme valsts attīstības plānošanā. Cēsis: Culturelab, 51.-52. lpp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jagersma, P.K. (2009). The strategic value of sustainable stakeholder management. Business Strategy Series, 10 (6), pp. 339-344.10.1108/17515630911005619]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research, Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 1 (2), pp. 112-133.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klamer, A., Veldhuis, O. (1999). Cultureel ondernemerschap: wat is dat eigenlijk? NRC Handelsblad, 23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kroplijs, A., Raščevska, M. (2010). Kvalitatīvās pētniecības metodes sociālajās zinātnēs. Rīga: SIA “Izdevniecība RaKa”, 190 lpp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindlof, T.R., Taylor, B.C. (2002).Qualitative communication research methods (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, p. 357.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morgan, D.L., Krueger, R.A. (1997).The Focus Group Kit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, p. 692.]Search in Google Scholar
[Noordman, D. (2003). Kunstmanagement. Den Haag: Elsevier, pp. 13-17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stam, E. (2006). Coaching for Cultural Entrepreneurship. Rotterdam: Rotterdam Erasmus University, 126 lpp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Philips, R. (2003). Stakeholder Theory and Organizational Ethics. CA: Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, 200 lpp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Post, J.E., Preston, L.E., Sachs, S. (2002a). Redefining the Corporation, Stakeholder Management and Organizational Wealth. Stanford: Stanford University Press, p. 320.10.1515/9781503619692]Search in Google Scholar
[Post, J.E., Preston, L.E. Sachs, S. (2002b). Managing the extended enterprise, the new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45 (1), pp. 1.-23.10.2307/41166151]Search in Google Scholar
[Punch, K.F. (2005). Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage Publications, p. 320.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reņģe, V., Austers, I. (2004). Kvalitatīvās metodes sociālo priekšstatu pētījumos. Latvijas Universitātes raksti, 682: 29-40.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vondal, P. (2010). Conducting Mixed-Option Evaluations Performance Monitoring & Evaluation TIPS.]Search in Google Scholar
[Washington DC, USAID Center for Development Information and Development Evaluation. [Accessed 20.02.2016]. Available from http://transition.usaid.gov/policy/evalweb/documents/TIPSConductingMixedMethodEvaluations.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Walliman, N. (2006). Social research methods. London: Thousand Oaks, p. 224.10.4135/9781849209939]Search in Google Scholar
[Waddock, S., Bodwell, C. (2002). From TQM to TRM: emerging responsibility management approaches.Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 7: 113-126.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zemīte, I., Janovs, V., Luka, I. (2011). Quality benchmarking methodology: Case study of finance and culture industries in Latvia. Acta univ.agric.et silvic.,2: 385-390]Search in Google Scholar