This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Aharonson, B.S., & Schilling, M.A. (2016). Mapping the technological landscape: Measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolution. Research Policy, 45(12), 81–96.AharonsonB.S.SchillingM.A.2016Mapping the technological landscape: Measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolutionResearch Policy4512819610.1016/j.respol.2015.08.001Search in Google Scholar
Albert, M.B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3), 251–259.AlbertM.B.AveryD.NarinF.McAllisterP.1991Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patentsResearch Policy20325125910.1016/0048-7333(91)90055-USearch in Google Scholar
Alcácer, J., Gittelman, M., & Sampat, B. (2009). Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis. Research Policy, 38(2), 415–427.AlcácerJ.GittelmanM.SampatB.2009Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysisResearch Policy38241542710.1016/j.respol.2008.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Appio, F.P., Cesaroni, F., & Di Minin, A. (2014). Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: A document co-citation analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 623–661.AppioF.P.CesaroniF.Di MininA.2014Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: A document co-citation analysisScientometrics101162366110.1007/s11192-014-1329-0Search in Google Scholar
Arts, S., Appio, F., & van Looy, B. (2012). Validating patent indicators that assess technological radicalness: The case of biotechnology. In E. Archambault, Y. Gingras, & V. Larivière (Eds.), Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (Vol. 1, pp. 82–97). Montréal: Science-Metrix and OST.ArtsS.AppioF.van LooyB.2012Validating patent indicators that assess technological radicalness: The case of biotechnologyArchambaultE.GingrasY.LarivièreV.Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators18297Montréal: Science-Metrix and OSTSearch in Google Scholar
Bakker, J., Verhoeven, D., Zhang, L., & van Looy, B. (2016). Patent citation indicators: One size fits all? Scientometrics, 106(1), 187–211.BakkerJ.VerhoevenD.ZhangL.van LooyB.2016Patent citation indicators: One size fits all?Scientometrics106118721110.1007/s11192-015-1786-0Search in Google Scholar
Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127–145.BalconiM.BreschiS.LissoniF.2004Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent dataResearch Policy33112714510.1016/S0048-7333(03)00108-2Search in Google Scholar
Benson, C.L., & Magee, C.L. (2015). Quantitative determination of technological improvement from patent data. PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0121635.BensonC.L.MageeC.L.2015Quantitative determination of technological improvement from patent dataPLoS ONE104e012163510.1371/journal.pone.0121635439853725874447Search in Google Scholar
Boyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. (2008). Measuring science-technology interaction using rare inventor-author names. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 173–182.BoyackK.W.KlavansR.2008Measuring science-technology interaction using rare inventor-author namesJournal of Informetrics217318210.1016/j.joi.2008.03.001Search in Google Scholar
Briggs, K. (2015). Co-owner relationships conducive to high quality joint patents. Research Policy, 44(8), 1566–1573.BriggsK.2015Co-owner relationships conducive to high quality joint patentsResearch Policy4481566157310.1016/j.respol.2015.05.011Search in Google Scholar
Breitzman, A., & Thomas, P. (2015). The emerging clusters model: A tool for identifying emerging technologies across multiple patent systems. Research Policy, 44(1), 195–205.BreitzmanA.ThomasP.2015The emerging clusters model: A tool for identifying emerging technologies across multiple patent systemsResearch Policy44119520510.1016/j.respol.2014.06.006Search in Google Scholar
Bruck, P., Rethy, I., Szente, J., Tobochnik, J., & Erdi, P. (2016). Recognition of emerging technology trends: Class-selective study of citations in the US Patent Citation Network. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1465–1475.BruckP.RethyI.SzenteJ.TobochnikJ.ErdiP.2016Recognition of emerging technology trends: Class-selective study of citations in the US Patent Citation NetworkScientometrics10731465147510.1007/s11192-016-1899-0Search in Google Scholar
Callaert, J., van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., & Thijs, B. (2006). Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents. Scientometrics, 69(1), 3–20.CallaertJ.van LooyB.VerbeekA.DebackereK.ThijsB.2006Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documentsScientometrics69132010.1007/s11192-006-0135-8Search in Google Scholar
Callaert, J., Grouwels, J., & van Looy, B. (2012). Delineating the scientific footprint in technology: Identifying science within non-patent references. Scientometrics, 91(2), 383–398.CallaertJ.GrouwelsJ.van LooyB.2012Delineating the scientific footprint in technology: Identifying science within non-patent referencesScientometrics91238339810.1007/s11192-011-0573-9Search in Google Scholar
Callaert, J., Pellens, M., & van Looy, B. (2014). Sources of inspiration? Making sense of scientific references in patents. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1617–1629.CallaertJ.PellensM.van LooyB.2014Sources of inspiration? Making sense of scientific references in patentsScientometrics9831617162910.1007/s11192-013-1073-xSearch in Google Scholar
Callaert, J., Vervenne, J.B., van Looy, B., Magerman, T., Song, X., & Jeuris, W. (2014). Patterns of science-technology linkage. European Commission. Retrieved on November 29, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/patterns_of_science-technology_linkage.pdf.CallaertJ.VervenneJ.B.van LooyB.MagermanT.SongX.JeurisW.2014Patterns of science-technology linkageEuropean CommissionRetrieved on November 29, 2016, fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/patterns_of_science-technology_linkage.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Carpenter, M.P., Cooper, M., & Narin, F. (1980). Linkage between basic research literature and patents. Research Management, 13(2), 30–35.CarpenterM.P.CooperM.NarinF.1980Linkage between basic research literature and patentsResearch Management132303510.1080/00345334.1980.11756595Search in Google Scholar
Carpenter, M.P., Narin, F., & Woolf, P. (1981). Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information, 3(4), 160–163.CarpenterM.P.NarinF.WoolfP.1981Citation rates to technologically important patentsWorld Patent Information3416016310.1016/0172-2190(81)90098-3Search in Google Scholar
Carpenter, M.P., & Narin, F. (1983). Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence. World Patent Information, 5(3), 180–185.CarpenterM.P.NarinF.1983Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependenceWorld Patent Information5318018510.1016/0172-2190(83)90139-4Search in Google Scholar
Cassiman, B., Glenisson, P., & van Looy, B. (2007). Measuring industry-science links through inventor-author relations: A profiling methodology. Scientometrics, 70(2), 379–391.CassimanB.GlenissonP.van LooyB.2007Measuring industry-science links through inventor-author relations: A profiling methodologyScientometrics70237939110.1007/s11192-007-0208-3Search in Google Scholar
Chai, S., & Shih, W. (2016). Bridging science and technology through academic-industry partnerships. Research Policy, 45(1), 148–158.ChaiS.ShihW.2016Bridging science and technology through academic-industry partnershipsResearch Policy45114815810.1016/j.respol.2015.07.007Search in Google Scholar
Cho, Y., & Kim, M. (2014). Entropy and gravity concepts as new methodological indexes to investigate technological convergence: Patent network-based approach. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e98009.ChoY.KimM.2014Entropy and gravity concepts as new methodological indexes to investigate technological convergence: Patent network-based approachPLoS ONE96e9800910.1371/journal.pone.0098009405164324914959Search in Google Scholar
Chowdhury, G., Koya, K., & Philipson, P. (2016). Measuring the impact of research: Lessons from the UK’s research excellence framework 2014. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0156978.ChowdhuryG.KoyaK.PhilipsonP.2016Measuring the impact of research: Lessons from the UK’s research excellence framework 2014PLoS ONE116e015697810.1371/journal.pone.0156978Search in Google Scholar
Coward, H.R., & Franklin, J.J. (1989). Identifying the science-technology interface: Matching patent data to a bibliometric model. Science, Technology and Human Values, 14(1), 50–77.CowardH.R.FranklinJ.J.1989Identifying the science-technology interface: Matching patent data to a bibliometric modelScience, Technology and Human Values141507710.1177/016224398901400106Search in Google Scholar
Criscuolo, P, & Verspagen, B. (2008). Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patents. Research Policy, 37(10), 1892–1908.CriscuoloP.VerspagenB.2008Does it matter where patent citations come from? Inventor vs. examiner citations in European patentsResearch Policy37101892190810.1016/j.respol.2008.07.011Search in Google Scholar
Engelsman, E.C., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1991). Mapping of technology. A first exploration of knowledge diffusion amongst fields of technology. Policy Studies on Technology and Economy (BTE) Series. The Hague: Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs.EngelsmanE.C.van RaanA.F.J.1991Mapping of technology. A first exploration of knowledge diffusion amongst fields of technologyPolicy Studies on Technology and Economy (BTE) SeriesThe HagueNetherlands Ministry of Economic AffairsSearch in Google Scholar
Engelsman, E.C., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1994). A patent-based cartography of technology. Research Policy, 23(94), 1–26.EngelsmanE.C.van RaanA.F.J.1994A patent-based cartography of technologyResearch Policy239412610.1016/0048-7333(94)90024-8Search in Google Scholar
European Commission. (2005). Study on evaluating the knowledge economy – What are patents actually worth? The value of patents for today’s economy and society (PATVAL study). Retrieved on November 29, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/docs/patent/studies/patentstudy-report_en.pdf.European Commission2005Study on evaluating the knowledge economy – What are patents actually worth?The value of patents for today’s economy and society (PATVAL study)Retrieved on November 29, 2016, fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/docs/patent/studies/patentstudy-report_en.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Finardi, U. (2011). Time relations between scientific production and patenting of knowledge: The case of nanotechnologies. Scientometrics, 89(1), 37–50.FinardiU.2011Time relations between scientific production and patenting of knowledge: The case of nanotechnologiesScientometrics891375010.1007/s11192-011-0443-5Search in Google Scholar
Fukuzawa, N., & Ida, T. (2016). Science linkages between scientific articles and patents for leading scientists in the life and medical sciences field: The case of Japan. Scientometrics, 106(2), 629–644.FukuzawaN.IdaT.2016Science linkages between scientific articles and patents for leading scientists in the life and medical sciences field: The case of JapanScientometrics106262964410.1007/s11192-015-1795-zSearch in Google Scholar
Geim, A.K., & Novoselov, K.S. (2007). The rise of graphene. Nature Materials, 6(3), 183–191.GeimA.K.NovoselovK.S.2007The rise of grapheneNature Materials6318319110.1142/9789814287005_0002Search in Google Scholar
Grant, J., Green, L., & Mason, B. (2003). Basic research and health: A reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical science. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 217–224.GrantJ.GreenL.MasonB.2003Basic research and health: A reassessment of the scientific basis for the support of biomedical scienceResearch Evaluation12321722410.3152/147154403781776618Search in Google Scholar
Grupp, H. (Ed.). (1992). Dynamics of science-based innovation. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.GruppH.1992Dynamics of science-based innovationHeidelbergSpringer-Verlag10.1007/978-3-642-86467-4Search in Google Scholar
Guan, J.C., & Yan, Y. (2015). Technological proximity and recombinative innovation in the alternative energy field. Research Policy, 44(3), 545–559.GuanJ.C.YanY.2015Technological proximity and recombinative innovation in the alternative energy fieldResearch Policy44354555910.1016/j.respol.2016.05.002Search in Google Scholar
Guerzoni, M., Aldridge, T.T., Audretsch, D.B., & Desai, S. (2014). A new industry creation and originality: Insight from the funding sources of university patents. Research Policy, 43(10), 1697–1706.GuerzoniM.AldridgeT.T.AudretschD.B.DesaiS.2014A new industry creation and originality: Insight from the funding sources of university patentsResearch Policy43101697170610.4337/9781786432797.00024Search in Google Scholar
Halevi, G., & Moed, H.F. (2012). The technological impact of library science research: A patent analysis. In E. Archambault, Y. Gingras, & V. Larivière (Eds.), Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (Vol.1, pp. 371–380), Montréal: Science-Metrix and OST.HaleviG.MoedH.F.2012The technological impact of library science research: A patent analysisArchambaultE.GingrasY.LarivièreV.Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators1371380MontréalScience-Metrix and OSTSearch in Google Scholar
Hall, B.H., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16–38.HallB.H.JaffeA.TrajtenbergM.2005Market value and patent citationsRAND Journal of Economics3611638Search in Google Scholar
Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511–515.HarhoffD.NarinF.SchererM.VopelK.1999Citation frequency and the value of patented inventionsReview of Economics and Statistics81351151510.1162/003465399558265Search in Google Scholar
Hazuda, D.J., Felock, P., Witmer, M., Wolfe, A., Stillmock, K., Grobler, J.A., Espeseth, A., Gabryelski, L., Schleif, W., Blau, C., & Miller, M.D. (2000). Inhibitors of strand transfer that prevent integration and inhibit HIV-1 replication in cells. Science, 287(5453), 646–650.HazudaD.J.FelockP.WitmerM.WolfeA.StillmockK.GroblerJ.A.EspesethA.GabryelskiL.SchleifW.BlauC.MillerM.D.2000Inhibitors of strand transfer that prevent integration and inhibit HIV-1 replication in cellsScience287545364665010.1126/science.287.5453.64610649997Search in Google Scholar
Heilbron, J.L. (1972). Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute - Technology in retrospect and critical events in science. Isis, 63(1), 115.HeilbronJ.L.1972Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute - Technology in retrospect and critical events in scienceIsis63111510.1086/350858Search in Google Scholar
Ho, M.H.C., Lin, V.H., & Liu, J.S. (2014). Exploring knowledge diffusion among nations: A study of core technologies in fuel cells. Scientometrics, 100(1), 149–171.HoM.H.C.LinV.H.LiuJ.S.2014Exploring knowledge diffusion among nations: A study of core technologies in fuel cellsScientometrics100114917110.1007/s11192-014-1265-zSearch in Google Scholar
Hu, D., Chen, H., Huang, Z., & Roco, M.C. (2007). Longitudinal study on patent citation to academic research articles in nanotechnology (1976–2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(9), 529–542.HuD.ChenH.HuangZ.RocoM.C.2007Longitudinal study on patent citation to academic research articles in nanotechnology (1976–2004)Journal of Nanoparticle Research9952954210.1007/s11051-007-9215-9Search in Google Scholar
Huang, M.H., Chen, D.Z., Shen, D.Q., Wang, M.S., & Ye, F.Y. (2015). Measuring technological performance of assignees using trace metrics in three fields. Scientometrics, 104(1), 61–86.HuangM.H.ChenD.Z.ShenD.Q.WangM.S.YeF.Y.2015Measuring technological performance of assignees using trace metrics in three fieldsScientometrics1041618610.1007/s11192-015-1604-8Search in Google Scholar
Hummers, W.S., & Offeman, R.E. (1958). Preparation of graphitic oxide. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 80(6), 1339–1339.HummersW.S.OffemanR.E.1958Preparation of graphitic oxideJournal of the American Chemical Society8061339133910.1021/ja01539a017Search in Google Scholar
Hung, S.C., & Tu, M.F. (2014). Is small actually big? The chaos of technological change. Research Policy, 43(7), 1227–1238.HungS.C.TuM.F.2014Is small actually big? The chaos of technological changeResearch Policy4371227123810.1016/j.respol.2014.03.003Search in Google Scholar
Hung, W.C., Ding, C.G., Wang, H.J., Lee, M.C., & Lin, C.P. (2015). Evaluating and comparing the university performance in knowledge. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1269–1286.HungW.C.DingC.G.WangH.J.LeeM.C.LinC.P.2015Evaluating and comparing the university performance in knowledgeScientometrics10221269128610.1007/s11192-014-1470-9Search in Google Scholar
Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT). (1968). Technology in retrospect and critical events in science. Vol. 1. Chicago, Illinois: Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute.Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT)1968Technology in retrospect and critical events in science1Chicago, IllinoisIllinois Institute of Technology Research InstituteSearch in Google Scholar
Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT). (1969). Technology in retrospect and critical events in science. Vol. 2. Chicago, Illinois: Illinois Institute of Technology Research Institute.Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT)1969Technology in retrospect and critical events in science2Chicago, IllinoisIllinois Institute of Technology Research InstituteSearch in Google Scholar
Isenson, R.S. (1969). Project Hindsight (final report). Washington, DC, 20301: Office of the Director of Defense Research Engineering, AD495905.IsensonR.S.1969Project Hindsight (final report)Washington, DC, 20301Office of the Director of Defense Research EngineeringAD49590510.21236/AD0495905Search in Google Scholar
Kim, B., Gazzola, G., Lee, J.M., Kim, D., Kim, K., & Jeong, M.K. (2014). Inter-cluster connectivity analysis for technology opportunity discovery. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1811–1825.KimB.GazzolaG.LeeJ.M.KimD.KimK.JeongM.K.2014Inter-cluster connectivity analysis for technology opportunity discoveryScientometrics9831811182510.1007/s11192-013-1097-2Search in Google Scholar
Kim, E., Cho, Y., & Kim, W. (2014). Dynamic patterns of technological convergence in printed electronics technologies: Patent citation network. Scientometrics, 98(2), 975–998.KimE.ChoY.KimW.2014Dynamic patterns of technological convergence in printed electronics technologies: Patent citation networkScientometrics98297599810.1007/s11192-013-1104-7Search in Google Scholar
Ko, S.S., Ko, N, Kim, D., Park, H., & Yoon, J. (2014). Analyzing technology impact networks for R&D planning using patents: Combined application of network approaches. Scientometrics, 101(1), 917–936.KoS.S.KoNKimD.ParkH.YoonJ.2014Analyzing technology impact networks for R&D planning using patents: Combined application of network approachesScientometrics101191793610.1007/s11192-014-1343-2Search in Google Scholar
Lee, B., & Jeong, Y. (2008). Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 3–19.LeeB.JeongY.2008Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the co-word analysisScientometrics77131910.1007/s11192-007-1819-4Search in Google Scholar
Leten, B., Landoni, P., & van Looy, B. (2014). Science or graduates: How do firms benefit from the proximity of universities? Research Policy, 43(8), 1398–1412.LetenB.LandoniP.van LooyB.2014Science or graduates: How do firms benefit from the proximity of universities?Research Policy4381398141210.1016/j.respol.2014.03.005Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2011). Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies: An exploration of patterns of network formation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(5), 846–860.LeydesdorffL.RafolsI.2011Local emergence and global diffusion of research technologies: An exploration of patterns of network formationJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology62584686010.1002/asi.21509Search in Google Scholar
Lo, S.S. (2010). Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: A case of genetic engineering research. Scientometrics, 82(1), 109–120.LoS.S.2010Scientific linkage of science research and technology development: A case of genetic engineering researchScientometrics82110912010.1007/s11192-009-0036-8Search in Google Scholar
Luan, C.J., Hou, H.Y., Wang, Y.T., & Wang, X.W. (2014). Are significant inventions more diversified? Scientometrics, 100(2), 459–470.LuanC.J.HouH.Y.WangY.T.WangX.W.2014Are significant inventions more diversified?Scientometrics100245947010.1007/s11192-014-1303-xSearch in Google Scholar
Magerman, T., van Looy, B., & Song, X. (2010). Exploring the feasibility and accuracy of Latent Semantic Analysis based text mining techniques to detect similarity between patent documents and scientific publications. Scientometrics, 82(2), 289–306.MagermanT.van LooyB.SongX.2010Exploring the feasibility and accuracy of Latent Semantic Analysis based text mining techniques to detect similarity between patent documents and scientific publicationsScientometrics82228930610.1007/s11192-009-0046-6Search in Google Scholar
Magerman, T., van Looy, B., & Debackere, K. (2015). Does involvement in patenting jeopardize one’s academic footprint? An analysis of patent-paper pairs in biotechnology. Research Policy, 44(9), 1702–1713.MagermanT.van LooyB.DebackereK.2015Does involvement in patenting jeopardize one’s academic footprint? An analysis of patent-paper pairs in biotechnologyResearch Policy4491702171310.1016/j.respol.2015.06.005Search in Google Scholar
Maraut, S., & Martinez, C (2014). Identifying author–inventors from Spain: Methods and a first insight into results. Scientometrics, 101(1), 445–476.MarautS.MartinezC2014Identifying author–inventors from Spain: Methods and a first insight into resultsScientometrics101144547610.1007/s11192-014-1409-1Search in Google Scholar
Mehta, A., Rysman, M., & Simcoe, T. (2010). Identifying the age profile of patent citations: New estimates of knowledge diffusion. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(7), 1179–1204.MehtaA.RysmanM.SimcoeT.2010Identifying the age profile of patent citations: New estimates of knowledge diffusionJournal of Applied Econometrics2571179120410.1002/jae.1086Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (2000). Patent citations in a novel field of technology: What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology. Scientometrics, 48(2), 151–178.MeyerM.2000Patent citations in a novel field of technology: What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technologyScientometrics48215117810.1023/A:1005692621105Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (2001). Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics, 51(1), 163–183.MeyerM.2001Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technologyScientometrics51116318310.1023/A:1010572914033Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, M. (2005). Inventor-authors: Knowledge integrators or weak links? An exploratory comparison of co-active researchers with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Working Paper No 2005/1, Helsinki University of Technology.MeyerM.2005Inventor-authors: Knowledge integrators or weak links?An exploratory comparison of co-active researchers with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technologyWorking Paper No 2005/1, Helsinki University of TechnologySearch in Google Scholar
Morescalchi, A., Pammolli, F., Penner, O., Petersen, A.M., & Riccaboni, M. (2015). The evolution of networks of innovators within and across borders: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 44(3), 651–668.MorescalchiA.PammolliF.PennerO.PetersenA.M.RiccaboniM.2015The evolution of networks of innovators within and across borders: Evidence from patent dataResearch Policy44365166810.1016/j.respol.2014.10.015Search in Google Scholar
Mowery, D.C., & Ziedonis, A.A. (2015). Markets versus spillovers in outflows of university research. Research Policy, 44(1), 50–66.MoweryD.C.ZiedonisA.A.2015Markets versus spillovers in outflows of university researchResearch Policy441506610.1016/j.respol.2014.07.019Search in Google Scholar
Murray, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life. Research Policy, 33(4), 643–659.MurrayF.2004The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory lifeResearch Policy33464365910.1016/j.respol.2004.01.013Search in Google Scholar
Nakamura, H., Suzuki, S., Kajikawa, Y., & Osawa, M. (2015). The effect of patent family information in patent citation network analysis: A comparative case study in the drivetrain domain. Scientometrics, 104(2), 437–452.NakamuraH.SuzukiS.KajikawaY.OsawaM.2015The effect of patent family information in patent citation network analysis: A comparative case study in the drivetrain domainScientometrics104243745210.1007/s11192-015-1626-2Search in Google Scholar
Narin, F., & Noma, E. (1985). Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7(3–6), 369–381.NarinF.NomaE.1985Is technology becoming science?Scientometrics73–636938110.1007/BF02017155Search in Google Scholar
Narin, F., Rosen, M., & Olivastro, D. (1989). Patent citation analysis: New validation studies and linkage statistics. In A.F.J. van Raan, A.J. Nederhoff, & H.F. Moed (Eds.), Science and Technology Indicators: Their Use in Science Policy and their Role in Science Studies. Leiden: DSWO Press.NarinF.RosenM.OlivastroD.1989Patent citation analysis: New validation studies and linkage statisticsvan RaanA.F.J.NederhoffA.J.MoedH.F.Science and Technology Indicators: Their Use in Science Policy and their Role in Science StudiesLeidenDSWO PressSearch in Google Scholar
Narin, F., Hamilton, K., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317–330.NarinF.HamiltonK.OlivastroD.1997The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public scienceResearch Policy26331733010.1016/S0048-7333(97)00013-9Search in Google Scholar
Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K., Morozov, S.V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S.V., Grigorieva, I.V., & Firsov, A.A. (2004). Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 306(5696), 666–669.NovoselovK.S.GeimA.K.MorozovS.V.JiangD.ZhangY.DubonosS.V.GrigorievaI.V.FirsovA.A.2004Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon filmsScience306569666666910.1126/science.1102896Search in Google Scholar
Noyons, E.C.M., Engelsman, E.C., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1991). Tracing technological developments. Policy Studies on Technology and Economy (BTE) Series. The Hague: Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs.NoyonsE.C.M.EngelsmanE.C.van RaanA.F.J.1991Tracing technological developmentsPolicy Studies on Technology and Economy (BTE) SeriesThe HagueNetherlands Ministry of Economic AffairsSearch in Google Scholar
Noyons, E.C.M., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1994). Bibliometric cartography of scientific and technological developments of an R&D field. The case of optomechatronics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 157–173.NoyonsE.C.M.van RaanA.F.J.1994Bibliometric cartography of scientific and technological developments of an R&D field. The case of optomechatronicsScientometrics30115717310.1007/BF02017220Search in Google Scholar
Noyons, E.C.M., van Raan, A.F.J., Grupp, H., & Schmoch, U. (1994). Exploring the science and technology interface: Inventor-author relations in laser medicine research. Research Policy, 23(4), 443–457.NoyonsE.C.M.van RaanA.F.J.GruppH.SchmochU.1994Exploring the science and technology interface: Inventor-author relations in laser medicine researchResearch Policy23444345710.1016/0048-7333(94)90007-8Search in Google Scholar
Noyons, E.C.M., Buter, R.K., van Raan, A.F.J., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., & Rangnow, R. (2003). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: Nanoscience and nanotechnology. Report of project EC-PPN CT-2002-0001 to the European Commission. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University.NoyonsE.C.M.ButerR.K.van RaanA.F.J.SchmochU.HeinzeT.HinzeS.RangnowR.2003Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: Nanoscience and nanotechnologyReport of project EC-PPN CT-2002-0001 to the European CommissionLeidenCentre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Packer, A., & Webster, K. (1996). Patenting culture in science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility. Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(4), 427–453.PackerA.WebsterK.1996Patenting culture in science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibilityScience, Technology and Human Values21442745310.1177/016224399602100403Search in Google Scholar
Park, H., & Yoon, J. (2014). Assessing coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors using patent co-classification analysis: The case of Korean national R&D. Scientometrics, 98(2), 853–890.ParkH.YoonJ.2014Assessing coreness and intermediarity of technology sectors using patent co-classification analysis: The case of Korean national R&DScientometrics98285389010.1007/s11192-013-1109-2Search in Google Scholar
Perkmann, M., Fini, R., Ross, J.M., Salter, A., Silvestri, C., & Tartari, V. (2015). Accounting for universities’ impact: Using augmented data to measure academic engagement and commercialization by academic scientists. Research Evaluation, 24(4), 380–391.PerkmannM.FiniR.RossJ.M.SalterA.SilvestriC.TartariV.2015Accounting for universities’ impact: Using augmented data to measure academic engagement and commercialization by academic scientistsResearch Evaluation24438039110.1093/reseval/rvv020Search in Google Scholar
Ribeiro, L.C., Kruss, G., Britto, G., Bernardes, A.T., & Albuquerque, E.D.E. (2014). A methodology for unveiling global innovation networks: Patent citations as clues to cross border knowledge flows. Scientometrics, 101(1), 61–83.RibeiroL.C.KrussG.BrittoG.BernardesA.T.AlbuquerqueE.D.E.2014A methodology for unveiling global innovation networks: Patent citations as clues to cross border knowledge flowsScientometrics1011618310.1007/s11192-014-1351-2Search in Google Scholar
Rodriguez, A., Kim, B., Turkoz, M., Lee, J.M., Coh, B.Y., & Jeong, M.K. (2015). New multi-stage similarity measure for calculation of pairwise patent similarity in a patent citation network. Scientometrics, 103(2), 565–581.RodriguezA.KimB.TurkozM.LeeJ.M.CohB.Y.JeongM.K.2015New multi-stage similarity measure for calculation of pairwise patent similarity in a patent citation networkScientometrics103256558110.1007/s11192-015-1531-8Search in Google Scholar
Schmoch, U. (1993). Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics, 26(1), 193–211.SchmochU.1993Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicatorsScientometrics26119321110.1007/BF02016800Search in Google Scholar
Sherwin, C.W., & Isenson, R.S. (1967). Project Hindsight - A defense department study of the utility of research. Science, 156(3782), 1571–1577.SherwinC.W.IsensonR.S.1967Project Hindsight - A defense department study of the utility of researchScience15637821571157710.1126/science.156.3782.1571Search in Google Scholar
Squicciarini, M., Dernis, H., & Crisculo, C. (2013). Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic value. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2013/03, OECD Publishing. Retrieved on November 29, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4522wkw1r8-en.SquicciariniM.DernisH.CrisculoC.2013Measuring patent quality: Indicators of technological and economic valueOECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers2013/03OECD Publishing. Retrieved on November 29, 2016fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4522wkw1r8-en10.1787/5k4522wkw1r8-enSearch in Google Scholar
Small, H.G., Boyack, K.W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Research Policy, 43(8),1450–1467.SmallH.G.BoyackK.W.KlavansR.2014Identifying emerging topics in science and technologyResearch Policy4381450146710.1016/j.respol.2014.02.005Search in Google Scholar
Sternitzke, C. (2010). Knowledge sources, patent protection, and commercialization of pharmaceutical innovations. Research Policy, 39(6), 810–821.SternitzkeC.2010Knowledge sources, patent protection, and commercialization of pharmaceutical innovationsResearch Policy39681082110.1016/j.respol.2010.03.001Search in Google Scholar
Tijssen, R.J.W., Buter, R.K., & van Leeuwen, T.N. (2000). Technological relevance of science: Validation and analysis of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47(2), 389–412.TijssenR.J.W.ButerR.K.van LeeuwenT.N.2000Technological relevance of science: Validation and analysis of citation linkages between patents and research papersScientometrics47238941210.1023/A:1005603513439Search in Google Scholar
Tijssen, R.J.W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30(1), 35–54.TijssenR.J.W.2001Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flowsResearch Policy301355410.1016/S0048-7333(99)00080-3Search in Google Scholar
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172–187.TrajtenbergM.1990A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovationsRAND Journal of Economics21117218710.2307/2555502Search in Google Scholar
Upham, S.P., & Small, H. (2010). Emerging research fronts in science and technology: Patterns of new knowledge development. Scientometrics, 83(1), 15–38.UphamS.P.SmallH.2010Emerging research fronts in science and technology: Patterns of new knowledge developmentScientometrics831153810.1007/s11192-009-0051-9708898032214555Search in Google Scholar
van Looy, B., Debackere, K., Callaert, J., Tijssen, R., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Scientific capabilities and technological performance: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domains. Scientometrics, 66(2), 295–310.van LooyB.DebackereK.CallaertJ.TijssenR.van LeeuwenT.2006Scientific capabilities and technological performance: An exploration of emerging industrial relevant research domainsScientometrics66229531010.2139/ssrn.873594Search in Google Scholar
van Looy, B., Magerman, T., & Debackere, K. (2007). Developing technology in the vicinity of science: An examination of the relationship between science intensity (of patents) and technological productivity within the field of biotechnology. Scientometrics, 70(2), 441–458.van LooyB.MagermanT.DebackereK.2007Developing technology in the vicinity of science: An examination of the relationship between science intensity (of patents) and technological productivity within the field of biotechnologyScientometrics70244145810.1007/s11192-007-0211-8Search in Google Scholar
van Raan, A.F.J. (2015). Dormitory of physical and engineering sciences: Sleeping beauties may be sleeping innovations. PLoS ONE, 10(10), e0139786.van RaanA.F.J.2015Dormitory of physical and engineering sciences: Sleeping beauties may be sleeping innovationsPLoS ONE1010e013978610.1371/journal.pone.0139786Search in Google Scholar
van Raan, A.F.J. (2016). Sleeping beauties cited in patents: Is there also a dormitory of inventions? To be published, preprint retrieved on November 29, 2016, from https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.05750.van RaanA.F.J.2016Sleeping beauties cited in patents: Is there also a dormitory of inventions?To be published, preprint retrieved on November 29, 2016, fromhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1604.0575010.1007/s11192-016-2215-8Search in Google Scholar
van Vianen, B.G., Moed, H.F., & van Raan, A.F.J. (1990). An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Research Policy, 19(1), 61–81.van VianenB.G.MoedH.F.van RaanA.F.J.1990An exploration of the science base of recent technologyResearch Policy191618110.1016/0048-7333(90)90034-4Search in Google Scholar
Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., Andries, P., Zimmermann, E., & Deleus, F. (2002). Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics, 54(3), 399–420.VerbeekA.DebackereK.LuwelM.AndriesP.ZimmermannE.DeleusF.2002Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemesScientometrics54339942010.1023/A:1016034516731Search in Google Scholar
Verhoeven, D., Bakker, J., & Veugelers, R. (2016). Measuring technological novelty with patentbased indicators. Research Policy, 45(3), 707–723.VerhoevenD.BakkerJ.VeugelersR.2016Measuring technological novelty with patentbased indicatorsResearch Policy45370772310.1016/j.respol.2015.11.010Search in Google Scholar
Wada, T. (2016). Obstacles to prior art searching by the trilateral patent offices: Empirical evidence from International Search Reports. Scientometrics, 107(2), 701–722.WadaT.2016Obstacles to prior art searching by the trilateral patent offices: Empirical evidence from International Search ReportsScientometrics107270172210.1007/s11192-016-1858-9483382327122646Search in Google Scholar
Walter, S.G., Schmidt, A., & Walter, A. (2016). Patenting rationales of academic entrepreneurs in weak and strong organizational regimes. Research Policy, 45(2), 533–545.WalterS.G.SchmidtA.WalterA.2016Patenting rationales of academic entrepreneurs in weak and strong organizational regimesResearch Policy45253354510.1016/j.respol.2015.11.008Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., van Raan, A.F.J., & Smart, S. (2014). Exploring the relationship between the engineering and physical sciences and the health and life sciences by advanced bibliometric methods. PLoS ONE, 9(10), e111530.WaltmanL.van RaanA.F.J.SmartS.2014Exploring the relationship between the engineering and physical sciences and the health and life sciences by advanced bibliometric methodsPLoS ONE910e11153010.1371/journal.pone.0111530421610325360616Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X., Zhang, X., & Xu, S. (2011). Patent co-citation networks of Fortune 500 companies. Scientometrics, 88(3), 761–770.WangX.ZhangX.XuS.2011Patent co-citation networks of Fortune 500 companiesScientometrics88376177010.1007/s11192-011-0414-xSearch in Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Roijakkers, N., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). How fast do Chinese firms learn and catch up? Evidence from patent citations. Scientometrics, 98(1), 743–761.WangY.RoijakkersN.VanhaverbekeW.2014How fast do Chinese firms learn and catch up? Evidence from patent citationsScientometrics98174376110.1007/s11192-013-1016-6Search in Google Scholar
Winnink, J.J., Tijssen, R.J.W., & van Raan, A.F.J. (2013). The discovery of introns: Analysis of the science-technology interface. In S. Hinze, & A. Lottmann (Eds.), Translational Twists and Turns: Science as a Socio-economic Endeavor. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 427–438). Berlin, Institute for Research Information and Quality Assurance (iFQ). Retrieved on November 29, 2016, from http://www.forschungsinfo.de/sti2013/download/sti_2013_proceedings.pdf.WinninkJ.J.TijssenR.J.W.van RaanA.F.J.2013The discovery of introns: Analysis of the science-technology interfaceHinzeS.LottmannA.Translational Twists and Turns: Science as a Socio-economic Endeavor. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators427438BerlinInstitute for Research Information and Quality Assurance (iFQ). Retrieved on November 29, 2016fromhttp://www.forschungsinfo.de/sti2013/download/sti_2013_proceedings.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Winnink, J.J., & Tijssen, R.J.W. (2014). R&D dynamics and scientific breakthroughs in HIV/AIDS drugs development: The case of integrase inhibitors. Scientometrics, 101(1), 1–16.WinninkJ.J.TijssenR.J.W.2014R&D dynamics and scientific breakthroughs in HIV/AIDS drugs development: The case of integrase inhibitorsScientometrics101111610.1007/s11192-014-1330-7Search in Google Scholar
Winnink, J.J., & Tijssen, R.J.W. (2015). Early stage identification of breakthroughs at the interface of science and technology: Lessons drawn from a landmark publication. Scientometrics, 102(1), 113–114.WinninkJ.J.TijssenR.J.W.2015Early stage identification of breakthroughs at the interface of science and technology: Lessons drawn from a landmark publicationScientometrics102111311410.1007/s11192-014-1451-zSearch in Google Scholar
Yang, G.C., Li, G., Li, C.Y., Zhao, Y.H., Zhang, J., Liu, T., Chen, D.Z., & Huang, M.H. (2015). Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent value. Scientometrics, 105(3), 1319–1346.YangG.C.LiG.LiC.Y.ZhaoY.H.ZhangJ.LiuT.ChenD.Z.HuangM.H.2015Using the comprehensive patent citation network (CPC) to evaluate patent valueScientometrics10531319134610.1007/s11192-015-1763-7Search in Google Scholar
Zarrin, H., Higgins, D., Jun, Y., Chen, Z.W., & Fowler, M. (2011). Functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposite membrane for low humidity and high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 115(42), 20774–20781.ZarrinH.HigginsD.JunY.ChenZ.W.FowlerM.2011Functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposite membrane for low humidity and high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cellsJournal of Physical Chemistry C11542207742078110.1021/jp204610jSearch in Google Scholar
