Assessment of Coronary Plaque Vulnerability in Acute Coronary Syndromes using Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound. A Systematic Review

1. World Health Organisation, Cardiovascular disease (CVDs), 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/#.Search in Google Scholar

2. Choy SY, Mintz GS. What have we learned about plaque rupture in acute coronary syndromes? CurrCardiol Rep. 2010;12:338-343. doi: 10.1007/s11886-010-0113-x.10.1007/s11886-010-0113-x20425160Search in Google Scholar

3. Giblett JP, Brown AJ, Keevil H, Jaworski C, Hoole SP, West NE. Implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds following acute coronary syndrome is associated with reduced early neointimal growth and strut coverage. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:724-733. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I6A117.10.4244/EIJV12I6A11727542784Search in Google Scholar

4. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Evaluation of plaque characteristics in acute coronary syndromes: noninvasive assessment with multi-slice computed tomography and invasive evaluation with intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:2373-2381. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn356.10.1093/eurheartj/ehn35618682447Search in Google Scholar

5. Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:1282-1292. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179739.10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.17973920554950Search in Google Scholar

6. Andreou I, Antoniadis AP, Shishido K, et al. How do we prevent the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque from rupturing? Insights from in vivo assessments of plaque, vascular remodeling, and local endothelial shear stress. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2015;20:261-275. doi: 10.1177/1074248414555005.10.1177/107424841455500525336461Search in Google Scholar

7. Bentzon JF, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res. 2014;114:1852-1866. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721.10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.30272124902970Search in Google Scholar

8. Owen DRJ, Lindsay AC, Choudhury RP, Fayad ZA. Imaging of Atherosclerosis. Annual review of medicine. 2011;62:25-40. doi:10.1146/annurev-med-041709-133809.10.1146/annurev-med-041709-133809404116221226610Search in Google Scholar

9. Motoyama S, Masayoshi S, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.068.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.06819555840Search in Google Scholar

10. Sinclair H, Bourantas C, Bagnall A, Mintz GS, Kunadian V. OCT for identification of Vulnerable Plaque in Acute Coronary Syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:198-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.005.10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.12.00525677892Search in Google Scholar

11. Batty JA, Subba S, Luke P, Gigi LWC, Sinclair H, Kunadian V. Intracoronary imaging in the detection of vulnerable plaques. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016;18:28. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0705-1.10.1007/s11886-016-0705-1475433326879196Search in Google Scholar

12. Dalager MG, Bøttcher M, Thygesen J, Andersen G, Bøtker HE. Different Plaque Composition and Progression in Patients with Stable and Unstable Coronary Syndromes Evaluated by Cardiac CT. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:401357. doi:10.1155/2015/401357.10.1155/2015/401357453832326339610Search in Google Scholar

13. Thomsen C, Abdulla J. Characteristics of high-risk coronary plaques identified by computed tomographic angiography and associated prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:120-129. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev325.10.1093/ehjci/jev325488289626690951Search in Google Scholar

14. Maurovich-Horvat P, Schlett CL, Alkadhi H, et al. The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1243-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.019.10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.01923236975Search in Google Scholar

15. Sawada T, Shite J, Garcia-Garcia HM, et al. Feasibility of combined use of intravascular ultrasound radiofrequency data analysis and optical coherence tomography for detecting thin-cap fibroatheroma. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:1136-1146. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn132.10.1093/eurheartj/ehn13218397871Search in Google Scholar

16. Jang IK. Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound? JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011;4:492-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.004.10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.00421596320Search in Google Scholar

17. Kajander OA, Pinilla-Echeverri N, Jolly SS, et al. Culprit plaque morphology in STEMI – an optical coherence tomography study: insights from the TOTAL-OCT substudy. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:716-723. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I6A116.10.4244/EIJV12I6A11627542783Search in Google Scholar

18. Finn AV, Chandrashekhar Y, Narula J. Vulnerable plaques: from PROSPECT to prospects... JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:334-336. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.02.004.10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.02.00422421182Search in Google Scholar

19. Takahashi K, Kakuta T, Yonetsu T, et al. In vivo detection of lipid-rich plaque by using a 40-MHz intravascular ultrasound: a comparison with optical coherence tomography findings. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013;28:333-343. doi: 10.1007/s12928-013-0177-9.10.1007/s12928-013-0177-923649535Search in Google Scholar

20. Tian J, Ren X, Vergallo R, et al. Distinct morphological features of ruptured culprit plaque for acute coronary events compared to those with silent rupture and thin-cap fibroatheroma: a combined optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2209-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.061.10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.06124632266Search in Google Scholar

21. Caplan JD, Waxman S, Nesto RW, Muller JE. Near-infrared spectroscopy for the detection of vulnerable coronary artery plaques. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(8 Suppl):C92-C96. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.045.10.1016/j.jacc.2005.12.04516631516Search in Google Scholar

22. Roleder T, Kovacic JC, Ali Z, Sharma R, et al. Combined NIRS and IVUS imaging detects vulnerable plaque using a single catheter system: a head-to-head comparison with OCT. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:303-311. doi: 10.4244/EIJV10I3A53.10.4244/EIJV10I3A5324769522Search in Google Scholar

23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b253510.1136/bmj.b2535271465719622551Search in Google Scholar

24. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008-2012.10.1001/jama.283.15.200810789670Search in Google Scholar

25. Kume T, Okura H, Yamada R, et al. Frequency and spatial distribution of thin-cap fibroatheroma assessed by 3-vessel intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography: an ex vivo validation and an initial in vivo feasibility study. Circ J. 2009;73:1086-1091.10.1253/circj.CJ-08-073319359816Search in Google Scholar

26. Yonetsu T, Lee T, Murai T, et al. Plaque morphologies and the clinical prognosis of acute coronary syndrome caused by lesions with intact fibrous cap diagnosed by optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2016;203:766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.03010.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.03026590891Search in Google Scholar

27. Kato M, Dote K, Sasaki S, et al. Presentations of acute coronary syndrome related to coronary lesion morphologies as assessed by intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2013;165:506-511. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.09.032.10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.09.03221962801Search in Google Scholar

28. Kwon JE, Lee WS, Mintz GS, et al. Multimodality Intravascular Imaging Assessment of Plaque Erosion versus Plaque Rupture in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Korean Circulation Journal. 2016;46:499-506. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.4.499.10.4070/kcj.2016.46.4.499496542827482258Search in Google Scholar

29. Maejima N, Hibi K, Saka K, et al. Morphological features of non-culprit plaques on optical coherence tomography and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:190-197. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu173.10.1093/ehjci/jeu17325240169Search in Google Scholar

30. Kubo T, Matsuo Y, Ino Y, et al. Optical Coherence Tomography Analysis of Attenuated Plaques Detected by Intravascular Ultrasound in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes. Cardiology Research and Practice. 2011; doi.org/10.4061/2011/687515.10.4061/2011/687515317396521941667Search in Google Scholar

31. Lee T, Kakuta T, Yonetsu T, et al. Assessment of Echo-Attenuated Plaque by Optical Coherence Tomography and Its Impact on Post-Procedural Creatine Kinase-Myocardial Band Elevation in Elective Stent Implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:483-491. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.013.10.1016/j.jcin.2010.12.01321596319Search in Google Scholar

32. Jonathan A. Batty, Subba S, Luke P, Li Wing Chi G, Sinclair H, and Kunadian V. Intravascular detection of the vulnerable plaque. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:169-78. doi: 10.1007/s11886-016-0705-1.10.1007/s11886-016-0705-1475433326879196Search in Google Scholar

33. Suh WM, Seto AH, Margey RJ, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Jang IK. Intravascular detection of the vulnerable plaque. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:169-178. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.958777.10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.95877721406663Search in Google Scholar

34. Xie Y, Mintz G, Yang J, et al. Clinical Outcome of Nonculprit Plaque Ruptures in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in the PROSPECT Study. 2014. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.10.010.10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.10.01024631511Search in Google Scholar

35. Nicholls SJ, Hsu A, Wolski K, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-derived measures of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2399-2407. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.026.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.02620488313Search in Google Scholar