The Diagnosis and Hemodynamic Monitoring of Circulatory Shock: Current and Future Trends

1. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33:575-90.10.1007/s00134-007-0531-417285286Search in Google Scholar

2. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:1795-815.10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z423977825392034Search in Google Scholar

3. Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A, et al. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16. Crit Care. 2011;15:229.10.1186/cc10291338759221884645Search in Google Scholar

4. Vincent JL, Pelosi P, Pearse R, et al. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12. Crit Care. 2015;19:224.10.1186/s13054-015-0932-7442458525953531Search in Google Scholar

5. Herget-Rosenthal S, Saner F, Chawla L S. Approach to hemodynamic shock and vasopressors. J Am SocNephrol. 2008;3:546-53.10.2215/CJN.01820407663107618256381Search in Google Scholar

6. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:864-74.10.1097/00003246-199206000-00025Search in Google Scholar

7. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801-10.10.1001/jama.2016.0287496857426903338Search in Google Scholar

8. Shankar-Hari M, Phillips GS, Levy ML, et al. Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:775-87.10.1001/jama.2016.0289491039226903336Search in Google Scholar

9. Finfer S, Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory Shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1726-34.10.1056/NEJMra120894324171518Search in Google Scholar

10. Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL, et al. Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients I. Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:344-53.10.1097/01.CCM.0000194725.48928.3A16424713Search in Google Scholar

11. Sakka SG, Klein M, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A. Prognostic value of extravascular lung water in critically ill patients. Chest. 2002;122:2080-6.10.1378/chest.122.6.208012475851Search in Google Scholar

12. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1546-54.10.1056/NEJMoa02213912700374Search in Google Scholar

13. Jawad I, Lukšić I, Rafnsson SB. Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality. J Glob Health. 2012;2:010404.10.7189/jogh.01.010404Search in Google Scholar

14. Goldberg RJ, Spencer FA, Gore JM, Lessard D, Yarzebski J. Thirty- Year Trends (1975 to 2005) in the Magnitude of, Management of, and Hospital Death Rates Associated With Cardiogenic Shock in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction A Population- Based Perspective. Circulation. 2009;119:1211-9.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.814947273083219237658Search in Google Scholar

15. Awad HH, Anderson FA Jr, Gore JM, Goodman SG, Goldberg RJ. Cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndromes: insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Am Heart J. 2012;163:963-71.10.1016/j.ahj.2012.03.00322709748Search in Google Scholar

16. Kauvar DS, Wade CE. The epidemiology and modern management of traumatic hemorrhage: US and international perspectives. Crit Care. 2005;9:S1-9.10.1186/cc3779322611716221313Search in Google Scholar

17. Zenati MS, Billiar TR, Townsend RN, Peitzman AB, Harbrecht BG. A brief episode of hypotension increases mortality in critically ill trauma patients. J Trauma. 2002;53:232-6.10.1097/00005373-200208000-0000712169927Search in Google Scholar

18. Rivers EP, Kruse JA, Jacobsen G, et al. The influence of early hemodynamic optimization on biomarker patterns of severe sepsis and septic shock. Critical Care Medicine. 2007;35:2016-24.10.1097/01.CCM.0000281637.08984.6E17855815Search in Google Scholar

19. Mikkelsen ME, Miltiades AN, Gaieski DF, et al. Serum lactate is associated with mortality in severe sepsis independent of organ failure and shock. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1670-7.10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819fcf6819325467Search in Google Scholar

20. Wacharasint P, Nakada TA, Boyd JH, Russell JA, Walley KR. Normal-range blood lactate concentration in septic shock is prognostic and predictive. Shock. 2012;38:4-10.10.1097/SHK.0b013e318254d41a22552014Search in Google Scholar

21. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368-77.10.1056/NEJMoa01030711794169Search in Google Scholar

22. Rödig G, Prasser C, Keyl C, Liebold A, Hobbhahn J. Continuous cardiac output measurement: pulse contour analysis vsthermodilution technique in cardiac surgical patients. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82: 525-30.10.1093/bja/82.4.52510472216Search in Google Scholar

23. Bendjelid K, Marx G, Kiefer N, et al. Performance of a new pulse contour method for continuous cardiac output monitoring: validation in critically ill patients. Br J Anaesth. 2013;aet116.10.1093/bja/aet11623625132Search in Google Scholar

24. Chung FT, Lin SM, Lin SY, Lin HC. Impact of extravascular lung water index on outcomes of severe sepsis patients in a medical intensive care unit. Respir Med. 2008;102:956-61.10.1016/j.rmed.2008.02.01618397821Search in Google Scholar

25. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, Bahloul M, Richard C, Teboul JL. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest. 2003;124:1900-8.10.1378/chest.124.5.190014605066Search in Google Scholar

26. Spöhr F, Hettrich P, Bauer H, Haas U, Martin E, Böttiger BW. Comparison of two methods for enhanced continuous circulatory monitoring in patients with septic shock. Intensive care med. 2007;33:1805-10.10.1007/s00134-007-0703-217549452Search in Google Scholar

27. Zhang Z, Xu X, Yao M, Chen H, Ni H, Fan H. Use of the PiCCO system in critically ill patients with septic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:1.10.1186/1745-6215-14-32356351123374652Search in Google Scholar

28. Mirea L, Ungureanu R, Pavelescu D, Grintescu I. Global enddiastolic volume: a better indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Critical Care. 2015;19:P179.10.1186/cc14259Search in Google Scholar

29. Madhusudan P, Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan BK, Cove ME. Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: reexamining the Paradigm. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:984082.10.1155/2014/984082414407625180196Search in Google Scholar

30. KDIGO (2012) Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury Section 2: AKI Definition. Kidney Int Suppl 2012;2:19-36.Search in Google Scholar

31. Cannesson M. Arterial pressure variation and goal-directed fluid therapy. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2010;24:487-97.10.1053/j.jvca.2009.10.00820022261Search in Google Scholar

32. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002;121:2000-8.10.1378/chest.121.6.200012065368Search in Google Scholar

33. Guyton AC, Jones CE, Coleman TG. Circulatory physiology: cardiac output and its regulation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company. 1973, pp.135-47.Search in Google Scholar

34. Magder S, De Varennes B. Clinical death and the measurement of stressed vascular volume. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1061-4.10.1097/00003246-199806000-000289635656Search in Google Scholar

35. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:691-9.10.1097/01.CCM.0000114996.68110.C9Search in Google Scholar

36. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:64-8.10.1097/01.CCM.0000249851.94101.4F17080001Search in Google Scholar

37. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1774-81.10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a25fd23774337Search in Google Scholar

38. Perel A. Assessing fluid responsiveness by the systolic pressure variation in mechanically ventilated patients. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsisinduced hypotension. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:1309-10.10.1097/00000542-199812000-000059856702Search in Google Scholar

39. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadan M, et al. Stroke Volume Variation as a Predictor of Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Brain Surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:984-9.10.1097/00000539-200104000-0003411273937Search in Google Scholar

40. Preisman S, Kogan S, Berkenstadt H, Perel A. Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95:746-55.10.1093/bja/aei26216286349Search in Google Scholar

41. Biais M, Ehrmann S, Mari A, et al. Clinical relevance of pulse pressure variations for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients: the grey zone approach. Crit Care. 2014;18:587.10.1186/s13054-014-0587-9424083325658489Search in Google Scholar

42. Monnet X, Teboul JL. Passive leg rising. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:659-63.10.1007/s00134-008-0994-y18214429Search in Google Scholar

43. Teboul JL, Monnet X. Prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:334-9.10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282fd6e1eSearch in Google Scholar

44. Magder S, Georgiadis G, Cheong T. Respiratory variations in right atrial pressure predict the response to fluid challenge. J Crit Care. 1992;7:76-85.10.1016/0883-9441(92)90032-3Search in Google Scholar

45. Reeves ST, Finley AC, Skubas NJ, et al. Basic perioperative transesophageal echocardiography examination: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:443-56.10.1016/j.echo.2013.02.01523622926Search in Google Scholar

46. Perrino AC JR, Harris SN, Luther MA. Intraoperative determination of cardiac output using multiplanetransesophageal echocardiography: a comparison to thermodilution. Anesthesiology. 1998;89:350-7.10.1097/00000542-199808000-000109710392Search in Google Scholar

47. Vieillard-Baron A, Chergui K, Rabiller A, et al. Superior vena caval collapsibility as a gauge of volume status in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30:1734-9.10.1007/s00134-004-2474-3Search in Google Scholar

48. Charron C, Caille V, Jardin F, Vieillard-Baron A. Echocardiographic measurement of fluid responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006;12:249-54.10.1097/01.ccx.0000224870.24324.cc16672785Search in Google Scholar

49. Cioccari L, Baur HR, Berger D, Wiegand J, Takala J, Merz TM. Hemodynamic assessment of critically ill patients using a miniaturized transesophageal echocardiography probe. Crit Care. 2013;17:R121.10.1186/cc12793405610423786797Search in Google Scholar

50. Vieillard-Baron A, Slama M, Mayo P, et al. A pilot study on safety and clinical utility of a single-use 72-hour indwelling transesophageal echocardiography probe. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:629-35.10.1007/s00134-012-2797-423287876Search in Google Scholar

51. Cavarocchi NC, Pitcher HT, Yang Q, et al. Weaning of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using continuous hemodynamic transesophageal echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146:1474-9.10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.05523993027Search in Google Scholar

52. Maltais S, Costello WT, Billings FT, et al. Episodic monoplane transesophageal echocardiography impacts postoperative management of the cardiac surgery patient. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2013;27:665-9.10.1053/j.jvca.2013.02.01223849522Search in Google Scholar

53. Krishnan S, Ngai J, Schlame M, Rabinowitz L. 276: Comparison of Htee and Swan-Ganz Catheter for the Evaluation of Volume Status in Patients Status Post AVR. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:1-328.10.1097/01.ccm.0000424494.48543.edSearch in Google Scholar

54. Puskarich MA, Trzeciak S, Shapiro NI, et al. Whole blood lactate kinetics in patients undergoing quantitative resuscitation for severe sepsis and septic shock. Chest. 2013;143:1548-53.10.1378/chest.12-0878367365923740148Search in Google Scholar

55. Pölönen P, Ruokonen E, Hippeläinen M, Pöyhönen M, Takala J. A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1052-9.10.1097/00000539-200005000-0001010781452Search in Google Scholar

56. Jones AE, Shapiro NI, Trzeciak S, Arnold RC, Claremont HA, Kline JA. Lactate clearance vs central venous oxygen saturation as goals of early sepsis therapy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2010;303:739-46.10.1001/jama.2010.158291890720179283Search in Google Scholar

57. Sánchez M, García-de-Lorenzo A, Herrero E, et al. A protocol for resuscitation of severe burn patients guided by transpulmonarythermodilution and lactate levels: a 3-year prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2013;17:R176.10.1186/cc12855405703223947945Search in Google Scholar