Differentiation of Five Species of Megachile (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae), based on Wing Shape

Adams, D. C., Slice, D. E., & Rolf, F. J. (2004). Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’. Italian Journal of Zoology, 71, 5-16.10.1080/11250000409356545Search in Google Scholar

Ascher, J. S., & Pickering, J. (2015). Discover Life bee species guide and world checklist (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila). Available at: http://www.discoverlife.org/mp/20q?guide=Apoidea_species.Search in Google Scholar

Baylac, M., Villemant, C., & Simbolotti, G. (2003). Combining geometric morphometrics with pattern recognition for the investigation of species complexes. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 80(1), 89–98. DOI: 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00221.x10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00221.xSearch in Google Scholar

Bohart, G. E. (1972). Management of wild bees for the pollination of crops. Annual Review of Entomology, 17, 287–312.10.1146/annurev.en.17.010172.001443Search in Google Scholar

Bookstein, F. L. (1991). Morphometric tools for landmark data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 435 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, M. T., & Wicker, L. R. (2000). Discriminant analysis. In: Tinsley H. E. A. Brown S. D. (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. Academic Press, San Diego, California: 209–235.Search in Google Scholar

De Meulemeester, T., Michez, D., Aytekin, A. M., Danforth, B. N. (2012). Taxonomic affinity of halictid bee fossils (Hymenoptera: Anthophila) based on geometric morphometrics analyses of wing shape. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 10(4), 755-764. DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2011.62870110.1080/14772019.2011.628701Search in Google Scholar

Dolati, L., Nazemi Rafie, J., & Khalesro, H. (2013). Landmark-based morphometric study in the fore and hind wings of an Iranian race of European honeybee (Apis mellifera meda). Journal of Apicultural Science, 57 (2), 187-197. DOI: 10.2478/jas-2013-002810.2478/jas-2013-0028Search in Google Scholar

Eardley, C., Roth, D., Clarke, J., Buchmann, S., Gemmill. B. (Eds). (2006). Pollinators and pollination: A resource book for policy and practice. African Pollinator Initiative. Pretoria. 77 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Francoy, T. M., Franco, F. F., & Roubik, D. W. (2012). Integrated landmark and outline-ased morphometric methods efficiently distinguish species of Euglossa (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini). Apidologie, 43, 609–617. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-012-0132-210.1007/s13592-012-0132-2Search in Google Scholar

Francoy, T. M., Silva, R. A. O., Nunes-Silva, P., Menezes, C., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V. L. (2009). Gender identification of five genera of stingless bees (Apidae, Meliponini) based on wing morphology. Genetics and Molecular Research, 8, 207–214.10.4238/vol8-1gmr557Search in Google Scholar

Gemmill-Herren, B., Aidoo, K., Kwapong, P., Martins, D., Kinuthia, W., Gikungu, M., Eardley, C. (2014). Priorities for research and development in the management of pollination services for agriculture in Africa. Journal of Pollination Ecology, 12(6), 40-51.10.26786/1920-7603(2014)1Search in Google Scholar

Gerula, D., Tofilski, A., Wegrzynowicz, P., Skowronek, W. (2009). Computer-assisted discrimination of honey bee subspecies used for breeding in Poland. Journal of Apicultural Science, 53 (2), 105-114.Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, V. H. (2008). Phylogeny and classification of the bee tribe Megachilini (Hymenoptera: Apoidea, Megachilidae), with emphasis on the genus Megachile. PhD Thesis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas. 274 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Güler, Y., Aytekin, A. M., & Cagatay, N. (2006). Systematical studies on Anthidiini (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) geometric morphometric approach. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 49(3), 474-483.Search in Google Scholar

Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan P. D. (2001). PAST Version 2.17: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4, 1-9.Search in Google Scholar

Kandemir, İ., Moradi, M. G., Özden, B., Özkan, A. (2009). Wing geometry as a tool for studying the population structure of dwarf honeybees (Apis florea Fabricius 1876) in Iran. Journal of Apicultural Research, 48(4), 238-246. DOI: 10.3896/IBRA.1.48.4.0310.3896/IBRA.1.48.4.03Search in Google Scholar

Klingenberg, C. P. (2011). MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources, 11, 353–357. DOI:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02924.x21429143Search in Google Scholar

Mac Leod, N. (2001). Landmarks, localization, and the use of morphometrics in phylogenetic analysis. In: Edgecombe, G., Adrain, J., Lieberman, B. (Eds.), Fossils, phylogeny, and form: an analytical approach. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York: 197-233.Search in Google Scholar

Michener, C. D. (2007). The bees of the world, second edition. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. xvi+[i]+953 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Miguel, I., Baylac, M., Iriondo, M., Manzano, C., Garnery, L., Estonba, A. (2011). Both geometric morphometric and microsatellite data consistently support the differentiation of the Apis mellifera M evolutionary branch. Apidologie, 42, 150-161. DOI: 10.1051/apido/201004810.1051/apido/2010048Search in Google Scholar

Nazemi Rafie, J., Mohamadi, R., & Teimory, H. (2014). Comparison of two morphometrics methods for discriminating of honey bee (Apis mellifera meda Sk.) populations in Iran. International Journal of Zoology and Research, 4, 61-70.Search in Google Scholar

Oleska, A., & Tofilski, A. (2014). Wing geometric morphometrics and microsatellite analysis provide similar discrimination of honey bee subspecies. Apidologie, 46(1):49-60. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-014-0300-710.1007/s13592-014-0300-7Search in Google Scholar

Pavlinov, I. Y. (2001). Geometric morphometrics, a new analytical approach to comparison of digitized images. Zoological Journal of Moscow, 79, 1-27.Search in Google Scholar

Pitts-Singer, T. L., & Cane, J. H. (2011). The alfalfa leaf-cutting bee, Megachile rotundata: the world’s most intensively managed solitary bee. Annual Review of Entomology, 56, 221–237. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120709-14483610.1146/annurev-ento-120709-144836Search in Google Scholar

Rohlf, F. J. (2010). tpsDIG, Version 2.16. A program for digitizing landmarks and outlines for geometric morphometrics. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA. Available at: http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/.Search in Google Scholar

Sheffield, C. S., Ratti, C., Packer, L., Griswold, T. (2011). Leafcutter and mason bees of the genus Megachile Latreille (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in Canada and Alaska. Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification, 18, 1–107. DOI: 10.3752/cjai.2011.1810.3752/cjai.2011.18Search in Google Scholar

StatSoft Inc. (2011). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. Available at: http://www.statsoft.com.Search in Google Scholar

Tofilski, A. (2008). Using geometric morphometrics and standard morphometry to discriminate three honeybee subspecies. Apidologie, 39(5), 558-563. DOI: 10.1051/apido:200803710.1051/apido:2008037Search in Google Scholar

Williams, N. M., & Goodell, K. (2000). Association of mandible shape and nesting material in Osmia Panzer (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae): A morphometric analysis. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 93(2), 318-325.10.1603/0013-8746(2000)093[0318:AOMSAN]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar