Choosing the Right Path: Image Schema Theory as a Foundation for Concept Invention

Aguilar, W., and Pérez y Pérez, R. 2015. Dev E-R: A computational model of early cognitive development as a creative process. Cognitive Systems Research 33:17–41.10.1016/j.cogsys.2014.09.002Search in Google Scholar

Ahrens, K., and Say, A. L. 1999. Mapping Image Schemas and Traslating Metaphors. In Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, J., and Hayes, P. 1985. A Common-Sense Theory of Time. In Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-85), 528–531.Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual review of psychology 59:617–645.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, B., and Cialone, C. 2014. Corpus Guided Sense Cluster Analysis: a methodology for ontology development (with examples from the spatial domain). In Garbacz, P., and Kutz, O., eds., 8th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS), volume 267 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 213–226. IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Blackburn, P.; de Rijke, M.; and Venema, Y. 2001. Modal Logic. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107050884Search in Google Scholar

Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1):1–28.10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6Search in Google Scholar

Brugman, C., and Lakoff, G. 1988. Cognitive Topology and Lexical Networks. In Stephen Small, Gary Cottrell, M. T., ed., Lexical ambiguity resolution. 477–508.10.1016/B978-0-08-051013-2.50022-7Search in Google Scholar

Chrisley, R. 2003. Embodied artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 149:131–150.10.1016/S0004-3702(03)00055-9Search in Google Scholar

Clausner, T. C., and Croft, W. 1999. Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10(1):1–31.10.1515/cogl.1999.001Search in Google Scholar

Cohn, A. G., and Renz, J. 2007. Qualitative Spatial Representation and Reasoning. In van Harmelen et al., F., ed., Handbook of Knowledge Representation. Oxford: Elsevier. 551–596.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In Rescher, N., ed., The logic of decision and action. 81–94.Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. 1998. Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science 22(2):133–187.10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1Search in Google Scholar

Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. 2003. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, J., and Narayanan, S. 2004. Embodied meaning in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language 89(2):385–392.10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00355-9Search in Google Scholar

Forbus, K.; Falkenhainer, B.; and Gentner, D. 1989. The structure-mapping engine. Artificial Intelligence 41:1–63.10.1016/0004-3702(89)90077-5Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V., and Lakoff, G. 2005. The Brain’s concepts: the role of the Sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive neuropsychology 22(3):455–79.10.1080/0264329044200031021038261Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, P. 2007. Embodiment in Cognition and Culture, volume 71 of Advances in Consciousness Research. John Benjamins Publishing Company. chapter Cognitive semantics and image schemas with embodied forces, 57–76.Search in Google Scholar

Gentner, D. 1983. Structure mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7(2):155–170.10.1207/s15516709cog0702_3Search in Google Scholar

Gibson, J. J. 1977. The theory of affordances, in Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Towards an Ecological Psychology. In Shaw, R., and Bransford, J., eds., Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology. Hillsdale: NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 67–82.Search in Google Scholar

Goguen, J. A., and Harrell, D. F. 2010. Style: A Computational and Conceptual Blending-Based Approach. In Argamon, S., and Dubnov, S., eds., The Structure of Style: Algorithmic Approaches to Understanding Manner and Meaning. Berlin: Springer. 147–170.10.1007/978-3-642-12337-5_12Search in Google Scholar

Goldin, G. A. 2001. Counting on the metaphorical. Nature 413(6851):18–19.10.1038/35092607Search in Google Scholar

Grüninger, M.; Hahmann, T.; Hashemi, A.; Ong, D.; and Ozgovde, A. 2012. Modular First-Order Ontologies Via Repositories. Applied Ontology 7(2):169–209.10.3233/AO-2012-0106Search in Google Scholar

Hedblom, M. M.; Kutz, O.; and Neuhaus, F. 2014. On the cognitive and logical role of image schemas in computational conceptual blending. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Cognition (AIC-2014), Torino, Italy, November 26th–27th, volume Volume 1315 of CEUR-WS.Search in Google Scholar

Hedblom, M. M.; Kutz, O.; and Neuhaus, F. 2015. Image Schemas as Families of Theories. In Besold, T. R.; Kühnberger, K.-U.; Schorlemmer, M.; and Smaill, A., eds., Proceedings of the Workshop “Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence” 2015, volume 2 of Publications of the Institute of Cognitive Science, 19–33. Institute of Cognitive Science.Search in Google Scholar

Johanson, M., and Papafragou, A. 2014. What does children’s spatial language reveal about spatial concepts? Evidence from the use of containment expressions. Cognitive science 38(5):881–910.10.1111/cogs.1210624641514Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reasoning. The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kamp, H. 1979. Instants, events and temporal discourse. In Bäuerle, R.; Schwarze, C.; and von Stechow, A., eds., Semantics from Different Points of View. Springer, Berlin. 376–417.Search in Google Scholar

Knauff, M.; Rauh, R.; and Renz, J. 1997. A cognitive assessment of topological spatial relations: Results from an empirical investigation. In Hirtle, S. C., and Frank, A. U., eds., Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS, volume 1329 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. 193–206.Search in Google Scholar

Koestler, A. 1964. The Act of Creation. Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. 2010. Metaphor:A Practical Introduction. Oxford University Press, USA.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, W. 2002. Modeling the Semantics of Geographic Categories through Conceptual Integration. In Proceedings of GIScience 2002, 108–118. Springer.10.1007/3-540-45799-2_8Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, W. 2007. An Image-Schematic Account of Spatial Categories. In Winter, S.; Duckham, M.; Kulik, L.; and Kuipers, B., eds., Spatial Information Theory, volume 4736 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. 152–168.Search in Google Scholar

Kutz, O.; Mossakowski, T.; Hois, J.; Bhatt, M.; and Bateman, J. 2012. Ontological Blending in DOL. In Besold, T.; Kühnberger, K.-U.; Schorlemmer, M.; and Smaill, A., eds., Computational Creativity, Concept Invention, and General Intelligence, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop C3GI@ECAI, volume 01-2012. Montpellier, France: Publications of the Institute of Cognitive Science, Osnabrück.Search in Google Scholar

Kutz, O.; Bateman, J.; Neuhaus, F.; Mossakowski, T.; and Bhatt, M. 2014a. E pluribus unum: Formalisation, Use-Cases, and Computational Support for Conceptual Blending. In Besold, T. R.; Schorlemmer, M.; and Smaill, A., eds., Computational Creativity Research: Towards Creative Machines, Thinking Machines. Atlantis/Springer.10.2991/978-94-6239-085-0_9Search in Google Scholar

Kutz, O.; Neuhaus, F.; Mossakowski, T.; and Codescu, M. 2014b. Blending in the Hub—Towards a collaborative concept invention platform. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Creativity.Search in Google Scholar

Kutz, O.; Mossakowski, T.; and Lücke, D. 2010. Carnap, Goguen, and the Hyperontologies: Logical Pluralism and Heterogeneous Structuring in Ontology Design. Logica Universalis 4(2):255–333. Special Issue on ‘Is Logic Universal?’.10.1007/s11787-010-0020-3Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G., and Núñez, R. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes from: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics Into Being. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Louwerse, M. M., and Jeuniaux, P. 2010. The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition 114(1):96–104.10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.00219818435Search in Google Scholar

Mandler, J. M., and Pagán Cánovas, C. 2014. On defining image schemas. Language and Cognition 0:1–23.10.1017/langcog.2014.14Search in Google Scholar

Mandler, J. M. 1992. How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological review 99(4):587–604.10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.5871454900Search in Google Scholar

Mandler, J. M. 2004. The Foundations of Mind : Origins of Conceptual Thought: Origins of Conceptual Though. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00369.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mandler, J. M. 2008. On the Birth and Growth of Concepts. Philosophical Psychology 21(2):207–230.10.1080/09515080801980179Search in Google Scholar

Menzel, C. 2011. Knowledge representation, the World Wide Web, and the evolution of logic. Synthese 182:269–295.10.1007/s11229-009-9661-2Search in Google Scholar

Morgenstern, L. 2001. Mid-Sized Axiomatizations of Commonsense Problems: A Case Study in Egg Cracking. Studia Logica 67:333–384.10.1023/A:1010512415344Search in Google Scholar

Mossakowski, T.; Kutz, O.; Codescu, M.; and Lange, C. 2013. The Distributed Ontology, Modeling and Specification Language. In Del Vescovo, C.; Hahmann, T.; Pearce, D.; and Walther, D., eds., Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Modular Ontologies (WoMO-13), volume 1081. CEUR-WS.Search in Google Scholar

Mossakowski, T.; Codescu, M.; Neuhaus, F.; and Kutz, O. 2015. The Road to Universal Logic–Festschrift for 50th birthday of Jean-Yves Beziau, Volume II. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser. chapter The distributed ontology, modelling and specification language - DOL.10.1007/978-3-319-15368-1_21Search in Google Scholar

Mossakowski, T.; Kutz, O.; and Codescu, M. 2014. Ontohub: A semantic repository for heterogeneous ontologies. In Proc. of the Theory Day in Computer Science (DACS-2014). Satellite workshop of ICTAC-2014.Search in Google Scholar

Mossakowski, T.; Lange, C.; and Kutz, O. 2012. Three Semantics for the Core of the Distributed Ontology Language. In Grüninger, M., ed., 7th International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mossakowski, T.; Maeder, C.; and Lüttich, K. 2007. The Heterogeneous Tool Set. In Grumberg, O., and Huth, M., eds., Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems. 13th International Conference, TACAS 2007, Held as Part of the Joint European Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2007 Braga, Portugal, March 24 - April 1, 2007. Proceedings, volume 4424 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 519–522. Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Nayak, S., and Mukerjee, A. 2012. Concretizing the image schema: How semantics guides the bootstrapping of syntax. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and Epigenetic Robotics, ICDL 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Oakley, T. 2010. Image Schema. In Geeraerts, D., and Cuyckens, H., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 214–235.Search in Google Scholar

Ontañón, S., and Plaza, E. 2010. Amalgams: A formal approach for combining multiple case solutions. In Case-Based Reasoning. Research and Development. Springer. 257–271.10.1007/978-3-642-14274-1_20Search in Google Scholar

Parson, T. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pereira, F. C., and Cardoso, A. 2003. Optimality Principles for Conceptual Blending: A First Computational Approach. AISB Journal 1(4).Search in Google Scholar

Prior, A. N. 1967. Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198243113.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Regier, T. 1996. The Human Semantic Potential: Spatial Language and Constrained Connectionism. The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3608.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Rohrer, T. 2005. Image Schemata in the Brain. In Hampe, B., and Grady, J. E., eds., From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics, volume 29 of Cognitive Linguistics Research. Walter de Gruyter. 165–196.Search in Google Scholar

Schiralli, M., and Sinclair, N. 2003. A Constructive Response to ‘Where Mathematics Comes From’. Educational Studies in Mathematics 52:79–91.10.1023/A:1023673520853Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, M.; Krumnack, U.; Gust, H.; and Khnberger, K.-U. 2014. Heuristic-Driven Theory Projection: An Overview. In Prade, H., and Richard, G., eds., Computational Approaches to Analogical Reasoning: Current Trends, Computational Intelligence 548. Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-54516-0_7Search in Google Scholar

Schorlemmer, M.; Smaill, A.; Kühnberger, K.-U.; Kutz, O.; Colton, S.; Cambouropoulos, E.; and Pease, A. 2014. COINVENT: Towards a Computational Concept Invention Theory. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Creativity.Search in Google Scholar

Schwering, A.; Krumnack, U.; Kühnberger, K.-U.; and Gust, H. 2009. Syntactic Principles of Heuristic-Driven Theory Projection. Cognitive Systems Research 10(3):251–269.10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.09.002Search in Google Scholar

St. Amant, R.; Morrison, C. T.; Chang, Y.-H.; Cohen, P. R.; and Beal, C. 2006. An image schema language. In International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM), 292–297.Search in Google Scholar

Tettamanti, M.; Buccino, G.; Saccuman, M. C.; Gallese, V.; Danna, M.; Scifo, P.; Fazio, F.; Rizzolatti, G.; and Perani, D. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 273–281.10.1162/089892905312496515811239Search in Google Scholar

Turner, M. 2007. The Way We Imagine. In Roth, I., ed., Imaginative Minds - Proceedings of the British Academy. Oxford: OUP. 213–236.10.5871/bacad/9780197264195.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Turner, M. 2014. The Origin of Ideas: Blending, Creativity, and the Human Spark. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Benthem, J. F. A. K. 1983. The Logic of Time. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Veale, T., and Keane, M. T. 1992. Conceptual Scaffolding: a Spatially Founded Meaning Representation for Metaphor Comprehension. Computational Intelligence 8(3):494–519.10.1111/j.1467-8640.1992.tb00377.xSearch in Google Scholar

Veale, T.; Feyaerts, K.; and Forceville, C. 2013. E Unis Pluribum: Using Mental Agility to Achieve Creative Duality in Word, Image and Sound. In Creativity and the Agile Mind: A Multi-Disciplinary Study of a Multi-Faceted Phenomenon (Applications of Cognitive Linguistics). 37–57.10.1515/9783110295290.37Search in Google Scholar

Vernon, D. 2014. Artificial Cognitive Systems: A Primer. MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Voorhees, B. 2004. Embodied Mathematics: Comments on Lakoff and Núñez. Journal of Consciousness Studies 11(9):83–88.Search in Google Scholar

Walton, L., and Worboys, M. 2009. An Algebraic Approach to Image Schemas for Geographic Space. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Spatial Information Theory (COSIT), 357–370.Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, A. 1996. Semantics : Primes and Universals: Primes and Universals. Oxford University Press, UK.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, N. L., and Gibbs, R. W. 2007. Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive science 31(4):721–731.10.1080/1532690070139996221635315Search in Google Scholar