[Barnden, J. 2008. Metaphor and artificial intelligence: Why they matter to each other. In Gibbs, R. W., ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 311–338.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brants, T., and Franz, A. 2006. Web IT 5-gram database, Version 1. The Linguistic Data Consortium.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burroughs, W. S. 1963. The Cut-Up Method. In Jones, L., ed., The Moderns: An Anthology of New Writing in America. New York, NY: Corinth Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carbonell, J. G. 1981. Metaphor: An inescapable phenomenon in natural language comprehension. Technical Report 2404, Carnegie Mellon Computer Science Department, Pittsburgh, PA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chamberlain, W., and Etter, T. 1983. The Policeman’s Beard is Half-Constructed: Computer Prose and Poetry. London, UK: Warner Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dewey, C. 2014. What happens when @everyword ends? The Wall Street Journal (Intersect column) May 23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Duchamp, M. 1917. The Richard Mutt Case. Blind Man 2:4–5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Falkenhainer, B.; Forbus, K. D.; and Gentner, D. 1989. Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples. Artificial Intelligence 41:1–63.10.1016/0004-3702(89)90077-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Fass, D. 1991. Met*: a method for discriminating metonymy and metaphor by computer. Computational Linguistics 17(1):49–90.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fellbaum, C., ed. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Freud, S. 1919. Das Unheimliche. In Collected Papers, volume XII. G.W. 229–268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gentner, D.; Falkenhainer, B.; and Skorstad, J. 1989. Metaphor: The Good, The Bad and the Ugly. In Wilks, Y., ed., Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, W. 2005. God’s Little Toys. Wired Magazine 13.07.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giora, R.; Fein, O.; Kronrod, A.; Elnatan, I.; Shuval, N.; and Zur, A. 2004. Weapons of Mass Distraction: Optimal Innovation and Pleasure Ratings. Metaphor and Symbol 19(2):115–141.10.1207/s15327868ms1902_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Glucksberg, S. 1998. Understanding metaphors. Current Directions in Psychological Science 7:39–43.10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175582]Search in Google Scholar
[Hughes, R. 1991. The Shock of the New: Art and the century of change. London, UK: Thames and Hudson.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hutton, J. 1982. Aristotle’s Poetics. New York, NY: Norton.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kazemi, D. 2015. TinySubversions.com. Web-site.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuenzli, R. E., and Naumann, F. M. 1989. Marcel Duchamp: artist of the century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lydenberg, R. 1987. Word Cultures: Radical theory and practice in William S. Burroughs’ fictio. Chicago, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.10.2307/2926980]Search in Google Scholar
[Magritte, R. 1929. Les Mots et les Images. La Révolution surréaliste (12):32–33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, J. H. 1990. A Computational Model of Metaphor Interpretation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[McKeganey, N. P. 1983. Cocktail party syndrome. Sociology of Health and Illness 5(1):95–103.10.1111/1467-9566.ep11340072]Search in Google Scholar
[Milic, L. T. 1971. The possible usefulness of computer poetry. In Wisbey, R., ed., The Computer in Literary and Linguistic Research, Publications of the Literary and Linguistic Computing Centre. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reddy, M. J. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Ortony, A., ed., Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 284–310.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, E. R. 1974. Characteristics of Speech and Language Developments in the child with Myelomeningocele and Hydrocephalus. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 39(4).10.1044/jshd.3904.465]Search in Google Scholar
[Searle, J. R. 1980. Mind, Brains and Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:417–457.10.1017/S0140525X00005756]Search in Google Scholar
[Sontag, S. 1966. Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, M. R. 2009. Marcel Duchamp: Étant donnés (Philadelphia Museum of Art). New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Veale, T., and Alnajjar, K. 2015. Unweaving the Lexical Rainbow: Grounding Linguistic Creativity in Perceptual Semantics. In Ventura, D., ed., Proceedings of ICCC-2015, the 6th International Conference on Computational Creativity. Park City, UT: Association for Computational Creativity.]Search in Google Scholar
[Veale, T., and Keane, M. T. 1997. The Competence of Sub-Optimal Structure Mapping on ‘Hard’ Analogies. In Proceedings of IJCAI’97, the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Nagoya, Japan. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.]Search in Google Scholar
[Veale, T., and Li, G. 2011. Creative Introspection and Knowledge Acquisition. In Burgard, W., and Roth, D., eds., Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. San Francisco, CA: AAAI Press.10.1609/aaai.v25i1.8073]Search in Google Scholar
[Veale, T., and Li, G. 2015. Distributed Divergent Creativity: Computational Creative Agents at Web Scale. Cognitive Computation (May):1–12.10.1007/s12559-015-9337-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Veale, T. 2012. Exploding the Creativity Myth: The Computational Foundations of Linguistic Creativity. London, UK: Bloomsbury.]Search in Google Scholar
[Veale, T. 2014. Running With Scissors: Cut-Ups, Boundary Friction and Creative Reuse. In Lamontagne, L., and Plaza, E., eds., Proceedings of ICCBR-2014, the 22nd International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning.10.1007/978-3-319-11209-1_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Veale, T. 2015. Game of Tropes: Exploring the Placebo Effect in Computational Creativity. In Ventura, D., ed., Proceedings of ICCC-2015, the 6th International Conference on Computational Creativity. Park City, UT: Association for Computational Creativity.]Search in Google Scholar
[Way, E. C. 1991. Knowledge Representation and Metaphor. Studies in Cognitive systems. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.10.1007/978-94-015-7941-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilks, Y. 1975. A preferential, pattern-seeking, semantics for natural language inference. Artificial Intelligence 6(1):53–74.10.1016/0004-3702(75)90016-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Wilks, Y. 1978. Making Preferences More Active. Artificial Intelligence 11(3):197–223.10.1016/0004-3702(78)90001-2]Search in Google Scholar