Transformative research: personal and societal

[1] Anderson, R., & Braud, W. (2011). Transforming Self and Others through Research: Transpersonal Research Methods and Skills for the Human Sciences and Humanities. New York, USA: SUNY Press10.1353/book2591Search in Google Scholar

[2] Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Cram, F., Chilisa, B., & Mertens, D.M. (2013). The journey begins. In Mertens, D.M., Cram, F., & Chilisa, B. (Eds.), Indigenous pathways into social research, pp. 11-40. Walnut Hills, CA: Left Coast PressSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Cram, F. & Mertens, D.M. (2015). Transformative and Indigenous frameworks for multimethod and mixed methods research. In S. Hesse-Biber & B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethods and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 91-110). New York, NY: Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar

[5] Farren, M., Crotty, Y., & Kilboy, L. (2015). Transformative potential of action research and ICT in the second language (L2) classroom. International Journal of Transformative Research, 2(2), 49-5910.1515/ijtr-2015-0012Search in Google Scholar

[6] Jones, J. (2015). Professional engagement in child protection: promoting reflective practice and deeper connection with the lived reality for children. International Journal of Transformative Research, 2(2), 30-3810.1515/ijtr-2015-0010Search in Google Scholar

[7] Hammond, M. (2016). How ideas of transformative learning can influence academic blogging. International Journal of Transformative Research, 3(1), 33-4010.1515/ijtr-2016-0006Search in Google Scholar

[8] Mertens, D.M. (2018). Mixed methods design in evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage10.4135/9781506330631Search in Google Scholar

[9] Mertens, D.M. (2015). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SageSearch in Google Scholar

[10] Mertens, D.M. & Tarsilla, M. (2015). Mixed methods evaluation. In S. Hesse- Biber & B. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of multimethod and mixed methods research inquiry (pp. 426-446). Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Mertens, D. M., & Wilson, A. T. (2012). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. New York, NY: Guilford PressSearch in Google Scholar

[12] National Health Committee. (2003). To have an “ordinary” life, Kia whai oranga “noa.” Wellington, New Zealand: National Health CommitteeSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Pratt, D., Peat, B. (2014). Vanishing point - or meeting in the middle? Student/supervisor transformation in a self-study thesis. International Journal of Transformative Research, 1(1), 1-2410.2478/ijtr-2014-0001Search in Google Scholar

[14] Smith, D. (2016). An intuitive approach to learning delivery in higher education. International Journal of Transformative Research, 3 (2), 8-1410.1515/ijtr-2016-0008Search in Google Scholar

[15] Symonette, H. (2009). Cultivating self as responsive instrument. In D.M. Mertens & P. Ginsberg (Eds.), Handbook of Social Research Ethics, pp. 279-294. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage10.4135/9781483348971.n18Search in Google Scholar

[16] Walton, J. (2014). What can the ‘transpersonal’ contribute to transformative research? International Journal of Transformative Research, 1(1), p. 25-44Search in Google Scholar