[Acemoglu, D., Griffith, R., Aghion, P., Zilibotti, F. (2010), Vertical integration and Technology: Theory and Evidence, Journal of the European Economic Association, 8 (5), pp. 989-1033.]Search in Google Scholar
[Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B. (1987), Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 567-574.10.2307/1935950]Search in Google Scholar
[Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Rey, P. (1999), Competition, Financial Discipline and Growth, Review of Economic Studies, pp. 825-852.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P. (2006), Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship? UCl Working Paper, No. 04.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldwin, J. R., Hanel, P., Sabourin, D. (2000), Determinants of Innovative Activity in Canadian Manufacturing Firms: the Role of Intellectual Property Rights, Statistics Canada Working Paper, 122.10.2139/ssrn.229792]Search in Google Scholar
[Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Van Reenen, J. (1999), Market Share, Market Value and Innovation in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms, The Review of Economic Studies, 66 (3), pp. 529-554.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, W. (1995), Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity, in: P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, W. M., Klepper, S. (1996), A Reprise of Size and R & D, The Economic Journal, 166 (437), July, pp. 925-951.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corsino, M., Espa, G., Micciolo, R. (2008), R&D, Firm Size, and Product Innovation Dynamics, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20 (5), pp. 423-443.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ettlie, J. E., Rubenstein, A. H. (1987), Firm Size and Product Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4 (2), pp. 89-108.10.1111/1540-5885.420089]Search in Google Scholar
[Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., Nelson, R. R. (eds.) (2006),The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford Handbooks Online.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferreira, D., Manso, G., Silva, A. C. (2012), Incentives to innovate and the decision to go public or private, Review of Financial Studies, 27 (1), pp. 256-300.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fisher, F. M., Temin, P. (1973), Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?, The Journal of Political Economy, 81, pp. 56-70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freeman, C. (1982), The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 2nd Edition, Francis Pinter, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Geroski, P. A. (1995), Market Structure, Corporate Performance, and Innovative Activity, Clarendon Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, B. H. (1992), Investment, Research and Development at the Firm Level: Does the Source of Financing Matter? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers, No. 4096.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hart, O. D. (1983), The Market Mechanism As an Incentive Scheme, The Bell Journal of Economics, pp. 366-382.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haruyama, T. (2006), An Inverted U Relationship Between Competition and Innovation: A Revisit, Kobe University, Discussion Paper, 623.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hashmi, A. R. (2013), Competition and Innovation: The Inverted-U Relationship. Revisited, Review of Economics and Statistics, 95 (5), pp. 1653-1668.10.1162/REST_a_00364]Search in Google Scholar
[Huergo, E., Jaumandreu, J. (2004), How Does Probability of Innovation Change with Firm Age?, Small Business Economics, 22 (3-4), pp. 193-207.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H. (1976), Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), pp. 305-360.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lerner, J., Sorensen, M., Stromberg, P. (2011), The Long-Run Impact of Private Equity: The Impact on Innovation, The Journal of Finance, 66, pp. 445-478.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levin, R. C., Reiss, P. C. (1989), Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R&D with Spillovers, Rand Journal of Economics, 19, pp. 538-556.]Search in Google Scholar
[Machin, S., Van Reenen, J. (1996), The Impact of R&D Knowledge Accumulation on Wages: Evidence from European Corporations, in: A. Belcher, et al. (eds.), R&D Decisions: Strategy, Policy and Disclosure, London, Routledge.10.4324/9780203073216.ch13]Search in Google Scholar
[Maiti, D., Singh, P. (2011), Firm Size, Finance and Innovation: Country Level Study, Working Paper, No. 4, University of Central Lancashire.]Search in Google Scholar
[Myers, S. C., Majluf, N. S. (1984), Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions: When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have, Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (2), pp. 187-221.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, R. R. (1991), Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?, Strategic Management Journal, 12 (S2, Winter), pp. 61-74.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nickell, S. J. (1996), Competition and Corporate Performance, Journal of Political Economy, 104 (4), pp. 724-746.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patel, P., Pavitt, K. (1992), The Innovative Performance of the World’s Largest Firms: Some New Evidence, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2 (2), pp. 91-102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peneder, M. (2012), Competition and Innovation: Revisiting the Inverted-U Relationship, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 12 (1), pp. 1-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polder, M., Veldhuizen, E. (2012), Innovation and Competition in the Netherlands: Testing the Inverted-U for Industries and Firms, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 12 (1), pp. 67-91.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rothwell, R., Dodgson, M. (1994), Innovation and Size of Firm, in: Dodgson M. and R. Rothwell (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 310-324.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scherer, F. M. (1965a), Size of Firm, Oligopoly, and Research: A Comment, Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, 31, pp. 256-266.10.2307/140068]Search in Google Scholar
[Scherer, F. M. (1965), Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity, and the Output of Patented Inventions, The American Economic Review, December, pp. 1097-1125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scherer, F. M., Huh, K. (1992), R&D Reactions to High-Technology Import Competition, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 74, pp. 202-212.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schumpeter, J. A. (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper and Row, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Oxford University Press, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shangqin, H., McCann, P., Oxley, L. (2009), Innovation in New Zealand: Issues of Firm Size, Local Market and Economic Geography, University of Canterbury Working Paper, No. 4.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shefer, D., Frenkel, A. (2005), R&D, Firm Size and Innovation: an Empirical Analysis, Technovation, 25 (1), pp. 25-32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sorensen, J. B., Stuart, T. E. (2000), Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (1), pp. 81-112.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sutton, J. (1991), Sunk Costs and Market Structure, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.]Search in Google Scholar
[Symeonidis, G. (1996), Innovation, Firm Size and Market Structure: Schumpeterian Hypotheses and Some New Themes, Economics Department Working Papers, No. 161, OECD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tether, B. S., Smith, I. J., Thwaites, A. T. (1997), Smaller Enterprises and Innovation in the UK: the SPRU Innovations Database Revisited, Research Policy, 26 (1), pp. 19-32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zona, F., Zattoni, A., Minichilli, A. (2013), A Contingency Model of Boards of Directors and Firm Innovation: The Moderating Role of Firm Size, British Journal of Management, 24 (3), pp. 299-315.]Search in Google Scholar
