[Altenberg, Bengt. 1982. The genitive v. the of-construction: A study of syntactic variation in 17th century English. Lund: Gleerup.]Search in Google Scholar
[Behaghel, Otto. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern. Indogermanische Forschungen 25: 110-142.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernaisch, Tobias. 2012. Attitudes towards Englishes in Sri Lanka. World Englishes 31(3): 279-291.10.1111/j.1467-971X.2012.01753.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernaisch, Tobias. 2015. The lexis and lexicogrammar of Sri Lankan English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g54]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernaisch, Tobias and Christopher Koch. 2016. Attitudes towards Englishes in India. World Englishes 35(1): 118-132.10.1111/weng.12174]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernaisch, Tobias and Claudia Lange. 2012. The typology of focus marking in South Asian Englishes. Indian Linguistics 73(1-4): 1-18.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernaisch, Tobias, Christopher Koch, Joybrato Mukherjee and Marco Schilk. 2011. Manual for the South Asian Varieties of English (SAVE) Corpus: Compilation, cleanup process, and details on the individual components. Giessen: Justus Liebig University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan Th. Gries and Joybrato Mukherjee. 2014. The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide 35(1): 7-31.10.1075/eww.35.1.02ber]Search in Google Scholar
[Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bock, J. Kathryn. 1982. Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 89(1): 1-47.10.1037/0033-295X.89.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, Mark and Robert Fuchs. 2015. Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide 36(1): 1-28.10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav]Search in Google Scholar
[Deshors, Sandra C. and Stefan Th. Gries. 2016. Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes: A two-step random forests analysis of ing vs. to complements. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21(2): 192-218.10.1075/ijcl.21.2.03des]Search in Google Scholar
[Ehret, Katharina, Christoph Wolk and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2014. Quirky quadratures: On rhythm and weight as constraints on genitive variation in an unconventional data set. English Language and Linguistics 18(2): 263-303.10.1017/S1360674314000033]Search in Google Scholar
[Emeneau, Murray B. 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32(1): 3-16.10.2307/410649]Search in Google Scholar
[Fuchs, Robert. 2016. Speech rhythm in varieties of English. Evidence from educated Indian English and British English. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-47818-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Gahl, Susanne and Susan Garnsey. 2004. Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80(4): 748-775.10.1353/lan.2004.0185]Search in Google Scholar
[Grafmiller, Jason. 2014. Variation in English genitives across modality and genres. English Language and Linguistics 18(3): 471-496.10.1017/S1360674314000136]Search in Google Scholar
[Greenbaum, Sidney. 1996. Introducing ICE. In S. Greenbaum (ed.). Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English, 3-12. Oxford: Clarendon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gries, Stefan Th. 2002. Evidence in linguistics: Three approaches to genitives in English. In R.M. Brend, W.J. Sullivan and A.R. Lommel (eds.). LACUS Forum XXVIII: What Constitutes Evidence in Linguistics?, 17-31. Fullerton, CA: LACUS.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gries, Stefan Th. and Allison S. Adelman. 2014. Subject realization in Japanese conversation by native and non-native speakers: Exemplifying a new paradigm for learner corpus research. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New empirical and theoretical paradigms. Cham: Springer. 35-54.10.1007/978-3-319-06007-1_3]Search in Google Scholar
[Gries, Stefan Th. and Sandra C. Deshors. 2014. Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: Two suggestions. Corpora 9(1): 109-136.10.3366/cor.2014.0053]Search in Google Scholar
[Gries, Stefan Th. and Tobias Bernaisch. 2016. Exploring epicenters empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes. English World-Wide 37(1): 1-25.10.1075/eww.37.1.01gri]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunesekera, Manique. 2005. The postcolonial identity of Sri Lankan English. Colombo: Katha Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hilpert, Martin. 2008. The English comparative - language structure and language use. English Language and Linguistics 12(3): 395-417.10.1017/S1360674308002694]Search in Google Scholar
[Hinrichs, Lars and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: A multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11: 437-474.10.1017/S1360674307002341]Search in Google Scholar
[Hundt, Marianne. 2013. The diversification of English: Old, new and emerging epicentres. In D. Schreier and M. Hundt (eds.). English as a contact language, 182-203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511740060.011]Search in Google Scholar
[Hundt, Marianne and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2012. Animacy in early New Zealand English. English World-Wide 33: 241-263.10.1075/eww.33.3.01hun]Search in Google Scholar
[Jahr Sohrheim, Mette-Catherine. 1980. The s-genitive in Present-day English. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jankowski, Briget Lynn. 2013. A variationist approach to cross-register language variation and change. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koch, Christopher and Tobias Bernaisch. 2013. Verb complementation in South Asian English(es): The range and frequency of “new” ditransitives. In G. Andersen and K. Bech (eds.). English corpus linguistics: Variation in time, space and genre - selected papers from ICAME 32, 69-89. Amsterdam: Rodopi.10.1163/9789401209403_006]Search in Google Scholar
[König, Ekkehard. 1993. Focus particles. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, T. Vennemann and H.E. Wiegand (eds.). Syntax: Ein Internationales Handbuch zeitgenössicher Forschung/An international handbook of contemporary research, 978-987. Berlin: de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lange, Claudia. 2012. The syntax of spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g45]Search in Google Scholar
[Lange, Claudia. 2016. The ‘intrusive as’-construction in South Asian varieties of English. World Englishes 35(1): 133-146.10.1111/weng.12173]Search in Google Scholar
[Leitner, Gerhard. 1992. English as a pluricentric language. In M.G. Clyne (ed.). Pluricentric languages: Differing norms in different nations, 179-237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110888140.179]Search in Google Scholar
[Liaw, Andy and Matthew Wiener. 2002. Classification and regression by random Forest. R News 2(3): 18-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liaw, Andy and Matthew Wiener. 2015. random Forest. Version 4.6-12. A package for R. (See Liaw and Wiener 2002).]Search in Google Scholar
[Lim, Lisa and Umberto Ansaldo. 2015. Languages in contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139019743]Search in Google Scholar
[Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyler, Michael. 2007. A dictionary of Sri Lankan English. Colombo: Mirisgala.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2007. Steady states in the evolution of New Englishes: Present-day Indian English as an equilibrium. Journal of English Linguistics 35(2): 157-187.10.1177/0075424207301888]Search in Google Scholar
[Mukherjee, Joybrato and Sebastian Hoffmann. 2006. Describing verb-complementational profiles of New Englishes: A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide 27(2): 147-173.10.1075/eww.27.2.03muk]Search in Google Scholar
[Nelson, Gerald. 1996. The design of the corpus. In S. Greenbaum (ed.). Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English, 3-12. Oxford: Clarendon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Osselton, Noel E. 1988. Thematic Genitives. In Nixon, Graham and John Honey (eds.). An historic tongue: Studies in English Linguistics in memory of Barbara Strang, 138-144. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003074687-12]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, Pam. 2009. Australian English as a regional epicenter. In T. Hoffmann and L. Siebers (eds.). World Englishes - problems, properties and prospects, 107-124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g40.09pet]Search in Google Scholar
[Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London and New York: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenbach, Anette. 2002. Genitive variation in English: Conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110899818]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenbach, Anette. 2005. Animacy versus weight as determinants of grammatical variation in English. Language 81(3): 613-644.10.1353/lan.2005.0149]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenbach, Anette. 2014. English genitive variation - the state of the art. English Language and Linguistics 18(2): 215-262.10.1017/S1360674314000021]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenbach, Anette and Letizia Vezzosi. 2000. Genitive constructions in Early Modern English: New evidence from a corpus analysis. In R. Sornicola, E. Poppe and A. Shisha-Halevy (eds.). Stability, variation and change of wordorder patterns over time, 285-307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.213.20ros]Search in Google Scholar
[Sanyal, Jyoti. 2006. Indlish: The book for every English-speaking Indian. Delhi: Viva Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schilk, Marco. 2011. Structural nativization in Indian English lexicogrammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.46]Search in Google Scholar
[Schilk, Marco, Tobias Bernaisch and Joybrato Mukherjee. 2012. Mapping unity and diversity in South Asian English lexicogrammar. Verb-complementational preferences across varieties. In M. Hundt and U. Gut (eds.). Mapping unity and diversity world-wide: Corpus-based studies of New Englishes, 137-165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g43.06sch]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2): 233-281.10.1353/lan.2003.0136]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618901]Search in Google Scholar
[Sedlatschek, Andreas. 2009. Contemporary Indian English: Variation and change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g38]Search in Google Scholar
[Senaratne, Chamindi Dilkushi. 2009. Sinhala-English code-mixing in Sri Lanka: A sociolinguistic study. Utrecht: LOT.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2010. The English genitive alternation in a cognitive sociolinguistics perspective. In D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen and Y. Peirsman (eds.). Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics, 141-166. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226461.139]Search in Google Scholar
[Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt and Lars Hinrichs. 2008. Probabilistic determinants of genitive variation in spoken and written English: A multivariate comparison across time, space, and genres. In T. Nevalainen, I. Taavitsainen, P. Pahta and M. Korhonen (eds.). The dynamics of linguistic variation: Corpus evidence on English past and present, 291-309. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/silv.2.22szm]Search in Google Scholar
[Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Douglas Biber, Jess Egbert and Karlien Franco. 2016. Toward more accountability: Modeling ternary genitive variation in Late Modern English. Language Variation and Change 28: 1-29.10.1017/S0954394515000198]Search in Google Scholar
[Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller, Benedikt Heller and Melanie Röthlisberger. 2016. Around the world in three alternations. Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 37(2): 109-137.10.1075/eww.37.2.01szm]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas, Russel. 1931. Syntactical processes involved in the development of the adnominal periphrastic genitive in the English language. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolk, Christoph, Joan Bresnan, Anette Rosenbach and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2013. Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica 30(3): 382-419.10.1075/dia.30.3.04wol]Search in Google Scholar
[Wulff, Stefanie and Stefan Th. Gries. 2015. Prenominal adjective order preferences in Chinese and German L2 English. A multifactorial corpus study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 5(1): 122-150.10.1075/lab.5.1.05wul]Search in Google Scholar