[Blauth-Henke, Christine. 2008. Reduplikation in Korpora. Zum Zusammenhang von Methodenreflexion und Forschungsgegenstand. In S. Buch, Á. Ceballos and C. Gerth (eds.). Selbstreflexivität: Beiträge zum 23. Forum Junge Romanistik (Göttingen, 30.05.-2.6.2007), 35-50. Bonn: Romanistischer Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crystal, David. 2006. Language and the Internet. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Curzan, Anne and Chris C. Palmer. 2006. The importance of historical corpora, reliability, and reading. In R. Facchinetti and M. Rissanen (eds.). Corpusbased studies of diachronic English, 17-36. Bern and New York: Peter Lang.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, Mark. 2008- . The corpus of contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. Available at: http://corpus.byu.edu/coca. Accessed 4.6.2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies, Mark. 2012. The corpus of American soap operas: 100 million words, 2001-2012. Available at: http://corpus2.byu.edu/soap. Accessed 2.5.2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dray, Nancy. 1987. Doubles and modifiers in English. Unpublished MA thesis, University of Chicago.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fessl, Angela. 2006. Reduplication finder 1.1. Available at: http://reduplication.uni-graz.at/. Accessed 1.10.2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Finkbeiner, Rita. 2014. Identical constituent compounds in German. Word Structure 7 (2): 182-213.10.3366/word.2014.0065]Search in Google Scholar
[Garretson, Gregory. 2015. Search-search: Reduplication finder. (Software).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ghomeshi, Jila, Ray Jackendoff, Nicole Rosen and Kevin Russell. 2004. Contrastive focus reduplication in English (The salad-salad paper). Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22 (2): 307-357.10.1023/B:NALA.0000015789.98638.f9]Search in Google Scholar
[Hohenhaus, Peter. 2004. Identical constituent compounding - a corpus-based study. Folia Linguistica 38 (3-4): 297-332.10.1515/flin.2004.38.3-4.297]Search in Google Scholar
[Hohenhaus, Peter. 2007. How to do (even more) things with nonce words (other than naming). In J. Munat (ed.). Lexical creativity, texts and contexts, 15-38. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/sfsl.58.08hoh]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, Laurence R. 1993. Economy and redundancy in a dualistic model of natural language. In S. Shore and M. Vilkuna (eds.). SKY - Yearbook of the Linguistic Association of Finland, 33-72. Helsinki.]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, Laurence R. 2008. Pragmatics and the lexicon. In P. van Sterkenburg (ed.). Unity and diversity of languages, 29-42. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/z.141.05hor]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, Laurence R. 2015. The lexical clone: Pragmatics, prototypes, and productivity. Presentation at 37. Jahrestagung der DGfS, Leipzig. 5.3.2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, Yan. 2009. Neo-Gricean pragmatics and the lexicon. International Review of Pragmatics 1 (1): 118-153.10.1163/187731009X455866]Search in Google Scholar
[Lieber, Rochelle. 2009. Identical-constituent compounds. In R. Lieber and P. Štekauer (eds.). The Oxford handbook of compounding, 364-365. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipka, Leonhard. 2000. English (and general) word-formation - the state of the art. In B. Reitz and S. Rieuwerts (eds.). Anglistentag 1999 in Mainz: Proceedings, 5-20.Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pedersen, Sarah and Caroline Macafee. 2007. Gender differences in British blogging. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (4): 1472-1492.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00382.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Rossi, Daniela. 2011. Lexical reduplication and affective contents: A pragmatic and experimental perspective. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 25: 148-175.10.1075/bjl.25.07ros]Search in Google Scholar
[Russell, Kevin. 2014. Corpus of English contrastive focus reduplications. Available at: http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~krussll/redup-corpus.html. Accessed 20.7.2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schler, Jonathan, Moshe Koppel, Shlomo Argamon and James Pennebaker. 2006. Effects of age and gender on blogging. In N. Nicolov, F. Salvetti, M. Liberman and J. H. Martin (eds.). Proceedings of 2006 AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Approaches for Analyzing Weblogs, 199-205. Available at: http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/2006/SS-06-03/SS06-03-039.pdf. Accessed 1.9.2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, Mike. 2012. WordSmith Tools version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.]Search in Google Scholar
[Song, Myoung Hyoun and Chungmin Lee. 2011. CF-reduplication: Dynamic prototypes and contrastive focus effects. In N. Ashton, A. Chereches and D. Lutz (eds.). Proceedings of the 21st Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT 21), 444-462. Available at: http://journals.linguisticsociety.org/proceedings/index.php/SALT/article/view/2590. Accessed 1.9.2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stefanone, Michael A. and Chyng-Yang Jang. 2007. Writing for friends and family: The interpersonal nature of blogs. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (1): 123-140.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00389.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Stolz, Thomas, Cornelia Stroh and Aina Urdze. 2011. Total reduplication: The areal linguistics of a potential universal. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1524/9783050050973]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, John R. 2003. Linguistic categorization. 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitton, Laura. 2006. The semantics of contrastive focus reduplication in English: Does the construction mark prototype-prototype? Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.]Search in Google Scholar