Pronoun omission and agreement: An analysis based on ICE Singapore and ICE India

Ariel, Mira. 1988. Referring and accessibility. Journal of Linguistics 24: 65-87.10.1017/S0022226700011567Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 1994. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics 30: 3-42.10.1017/S0022226700016170Search in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schliperoord and W. Spooren (eds.). Text representation, 29-87. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.8.04ariSearch in Google Scholar

Bao, Zhiming. 2001. The origins of empty categories in Singapore English. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 16: 275-319.10.1075/jpcl.16.2.03zhiSearch in Google Scholar

Barlow, Michael and Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Search in Google Scholar

Bhatt, Rakesh M. 2004. Indian English: Syntax. In B. Kortmann and E. Schneider et al. (eds.). A handbook of varieties of English, 1116-1130. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1998. The emergent lexicon. In M. C. Gruber, D. Higgins, K. S. Olson and T. Wysocki (eds.). CLS 34: The panels, 421-435. University of Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2001. Frequency effects on French liaison. In J. L. Bybee and P. J. Hopper (eds.). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 337-359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45.17bybSearch in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2002. Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14: 261-290.10.1017/S0954394502143018Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82: 711-733.10.1353/lan.2006.0186Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2007. Frequency of use and the organization of language. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. and Paul J. Hopper (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. and Joanne Scheibman. 1999. The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in American English. Linguistics 37: 575-596.10.1515/ling.37.4.575Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. In M. Juge and J. Moxley (eds.). Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, February 14-17, 1997: General session and parasession on pragmatics and grammatical structure, 378-388. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.10.3765/bls.v23i1.1293Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cole, Melvyn D. 2009. Null subjects: A reanalysis of the data. Linguistics 47: 559-587.10.1515/LING.2009.019Search in Google Scholar

Cole, Melvyn D. 2010. Thematic null subjects and accessibility. Studia Linguistica 64: 271-320.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2010.01172.xSearch in Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville G. 2006. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haegeman, Liliane. 1994. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In W. Pagliuca (ed.). Perspectives on grammaticalization, 3-28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.109.07haiSearch in Google Scholar

Huang, C.-T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531-574.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 1992. Against Chomsky’s typology of empty categories. Journal of Pragmatics 17: 1-29.10.1016/0378-2166(92)90026-8Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Yan. 2000. Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum et al. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Jaeggli, Osvaldo and Kenneth J. Safir (eds.). 1989. The null subject parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3Search in Google Scholar

Kachru, Yamuna. 2006. Hindi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/loall.12Search in Google Scholar

Krug, Manfed. 1998. String frequency: A cognitive motivating factor in coalescence, language processing and linguistic change. Journal of English Linguistics 26: 286-320.Search in Google Scholar

Lange, Claudia. 2012. The syntax of spoken Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/veaw.g45Search in Google Scholar

Leimgruber, Jakob R. E. 2013. Singapore English: Structure, variation, and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139225755Search in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

MacWhinney, Brian. 2001. Emergentist approaches to language. In J. L. Bybee and P. J. Hopper (eds.). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, 449-470. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.45.23macSearch in Google Scholar

Moag, Rodney F. and Robert Poletto. 1991. Discourse level evidence for South Asia as a linguistic area. Language Sciences 3: 229-254.10.1016/0388-0001(91)90016-TSearch in Google Scholar

Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2007. Steady states in the evolution of New Englishes: Present-day Indian English as an equilibrium. Journal of English Linguistics 35: 157-187.10.1177/0075424207301888Search in Google Scholar

Neeleman, Ad and Kriszta Szendrői. 2007. Radical pro drop and the morphology of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 671-716.10.1162/ling.2007.38.4.671Search in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501-558.Search in Google Scholar

Ruppenhofer, Josef and Laura A. Michaelis. 2010. A constructional account of genre-based argument omissions. Constructions and Frames 2: 158-184.10.1075/cf.2.2.02rupSearch in Google Scholar

Scheibman, Joanne. 2000. I dunno: A usage-based account of the phonological reduction of don't in American English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 105-124.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00032-6Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511618901Search in Google Scholar

Speas, Margaret. 1994. Null arguments in a theory of economy of projection. In E. Benedicto and J. T. Runner (eds.). University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17: Functional projections, 179-208. Amherst: Graduate Linguistics Student Association, University of Massachusetts.Search in Google Scholar

Speas, Margaret. 2006. Economy, agreement and the representation of null arguments. In P. Ackema, P. Brandt, M. Shoorlemmer and F. Weerman (eds.). Arguments and agreement, 35-75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Taraldsen, Knut T. 1980. On the nominative island condition, vacuous application, and the that-trace filter. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Search in Google Scholar

Wee, Lionel. 2004. Singapore English: Morphology and syntax. In B. Kortmann and E. Schneider et al. (eds.). A handbook of varieties of English, 1116-1130. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar