[Beck, J., Prazdny, K., & Ivry, R. (1984). The perception of transparency with achromatic colors. Perception & Psychophysics, 35(5), 407–422.10.3758/BF032039176462867]Search in Google Scholar
[Bergström, S. S. (1977). Common and relative components of reflected light as information about the illumination, colour, and three-dimensional form of objects. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 18(3), 180–186.10.1111/j.1467-9450.1977.tb00275.x897594]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloj, M. G., & Hurlbert, A. C. (2002). An empirical study of the traditional Mach card effect. Perception, 31(2), 233–246.10.1068/p01sp11922135]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, L. (2005). The topological approach to perceptual organization. Visual Cognition, 12(4), 553–637.10.1080/13506280444000256]Search in Google Scholar
[Cutting, J. E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cutting, J. E., & Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. In W. Epstein & S. Rogers (Eds.), Perception of space and motion (pp. 69–117). New York, NY: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Da Pos, O., & Burigana, L. (2013). Qualitative inference rules for perceptual transparency. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Handbook of experimental phenomenology: Visual perception of shape, space and appearance (pp. 343–367). New York, NY: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dechter, R. (2003). Constraint processing. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.]Search in Google Scholar
[Epstein, W. (1982). Percept-percept couplings. Perception, 11(1), 75–83.10.1068/p1100756752865]Search in Google Scholar
[Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilchrist, A. L. (2006). Seeing black and white. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195187168.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Gilchrist, A. L., Kossyfidis, C., Bonato, F., Agostini, T., Cataliotti, J., Li, X., Spehar, B., Annan, V., & Economou, E. (1999). An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychological Review, 106(4), 795–834.10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.79510560329]Search in Google Scholar
[Gogel, W. C. (1973). The organization of perceived space. I. Perceptual interactions. Psychologische Forschung, 36(3), 195–221.10.1007/BF004244764768288]Search in Google Scholar
[Gogel, W. C. (1976). An indirect method of measuring perceived distance from familiar size. Perception & Psychophysics, 20(6), 419–429.10.3758/BF03208276]Search in Google Scholar
[Hatfield, G. C. (2003). Representation and constraints: The inverse problem and the structure of visual space. Acta Psychologica, 114(3), 355–378.10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.07.00314670704]Search in Google Scholar
[Heidelberger, M. (2010). Functional relations and causality in Fechner and Mach. Philosophical Psychology, 23(2), 163–172.10.1080/09515081003727400]Search in Google Scholar
[Hochberg, J. E. (1957). Effects of the Gestalt revolution: The Cornell symposium on perception. Psychological Review, 64(2), 73–84.10.1037/h004373813420281]Search in Google Scholar
[Jäkel, F., Singh, M., Wichmann, F. A., & Herzog, M. H. (2016). An overview of quantitative approaches in Gestalt perception. Vision Research, 126, 3–8.10.1016/j.visres.2016.06.00427353224]Search in Google Scholar
[Johansson, G. (1970). On theories for visual space perception. A letter to Gibson. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 67–74.10.1111/j.1467-9450.1970.tb00719.x5525904]Search in Google Scholar
[Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. L. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 271–304.10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.14200514744217]Search in Google Scholar
[Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., Pont, S., & Richards, W. (2008). Gestalt and phenomenal transparency. Journal of the Optical Society of America, Series A, 25(1), 190–202.10.1364/JOSAA.25.000190]Search in Google Scholar
[Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kogo, N., Strecha, C., van Gool, L., & Wagemans, J. (2010). Surface construction by a 2-D differentiation-integration process: A neurocomputational model for perceived border ownership, depth, and lightness in Kanizsa figures. Psychological Review, 117(2), 406–439.10.1037/a001907620438232]Search in Google Scholar
[Köhler, W. (1913). Über unbemerkte Empfindungen und Urteilstäuschungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 66(Hefte 1 und 2), 51–80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marr, D. (1982). Vision. A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Metelli, F. (1970). An algebraic development of the theory of perceptual transparency. Ergonomics, 13(1), 59–66.10.1080/001401370089311185416869]Search in Google Scholar
[Neapolitan, R. E. (2004). Learning Bayesian networks. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oyama, T. (1969). S-S relations in psychophysics and R-R correlations in phenomenology. Psychologia, 12(1), 17–23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poggio, T., Torre, V., & Koch, C. (1985). Computational vision and regularization theory. Nature, 317(No. 6035), 314–319.10.1038/317314a02413361]Search in Google Scholar
[Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rock, I. (1997). Indirect perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/3727.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarris, V. (2006). Relational psychophysics in humans and animals: A comparative developmental approach. London, UK: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sarris, V. (2012). Epilogue: Max Wertheimer in Frankfurt and thereafter. In L. Spillmann (Ed.), On perceived motion and figural organization (pp. 253–265). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Savardi, U., & Bianchi, I. (2012). Coupling Epstein’s and Bozzi’s “percept-percept coupling”. Gestalt Theory, 34(2), 191–200.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sinico, M. (2013). Epistemic line of explanation for experimental phenomenology. Gestalt Theory, 35(4), 365–376.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spillmann, L. (2012). The current status of Gestalt rules in perceptual research: Psychophysics and neurophysiology. In L. Spillmann (Ed.), On perceived motion and figural organization (pp. 191–251). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Todd, J. T., Chen, L., & Norman, J. F. (1998). On the relative salience of Euclidean, affine, and topological structure for 3-D form discrimination. Perception, 27(3), 273–282.10.1068/p2702739775311]Search in Google Scholar
[Trommershäuser, J., Körding, K. P., & Landy, M. S. (Eds.). (2011). Sensory cue integration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195387247.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012a). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217.10.1037/a0029333348214422845751]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J. R., van der Helm, P. A., & van Leeuwen, C. (2012b). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252.10.1037/a0029334372828422845750]Search in Google Scholar