[Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chojnicka, Joanna. 2012. Linguistic Markers of Stance in Latvian Parliamentary Debates. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eckert, Penelope and McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 2003. Language and Gender. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791147]Search in Google Scholar
[EUFRA = European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. 2008. Homophobia and Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation in the EU Member States: Part I – Legal Analysis. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goffman, Erving. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction Ritual. New York: Pantheon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sunderland, Jane and Litosseliti, Lia. 2002. “Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations” in Gender Identity and Discourse Analysis. Lia Litosseliti and Jane Sunderland (Eds.). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 1–39.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trans-Fuzja. 2014. Gender Recognition in Poland. A Report on Court and Administrative Procedures. Warsaw: Fundacja Trans-Fuzja.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weatherall, Ann and Gallois, Cindy. 2003. “Gender and Identity: Representation and Social Action” in The Handbook of Language and Gender. Janet Holmes and Miriam Meyerhoff (Eds.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 487–508.]Search in Google Scholar
