Forest management decision making based on a real options approach: An application to a case in northeastern Argentina

Bayram, K., Ganikhodjaev, N. 2013. On pricing futures options on random binomial tree. – Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 435(1), 1–10.Search in Google Scholar

Bettinger, P., Boston, K., Siry, J., Grebner, D. 2009. Forest management and planning. Academic Press, California. 331 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Black, F., Scholes, M. 1973. The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. – Journal of Political Economy, 8(3), 637–659.10.1086/260062Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Brandão, L.E., Dyer, J.S., Hahn, W.J. 2005. Using binomial decision trees to solve real options valuations problems. – Journal of Decision Analysis, 2(2), 69–88.Search in Google Scholar

Broz, D., Rossit, D.A., Rossit, D.G., Cavallin, A. 2018. The Argentinian forest sector: opportunities and challenges in supply chain management. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. (In press).10.5267/j.uscm.2018.1.001Search in Google Scholar

Broz, D.R., Woitschach, G.B., Milanesi, G. 2014. Real Options in determining the optimal forest harvesting. (Opções reais na determinação da idade ótima de colheita para dois manejos florestais). – Cerne, 20(1), 89–96. (In Portuguese).10.1590/S0104-77602014000100012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Caprio, G. 2012. The evidence and impact of financial globalization. Academic Press, New York. 781 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Chidiak, M., Moreyra, A., Greco, C. 2003. Carbon capture and sustainable forest development in Patagonia Argentina: synergies and challenges. (Captura de carbono y desarrollo forestal sustentable en la Patagonia Argentina: Sinergias y Desafíos). CEPAL, Buenos Aires. 118 pp. (In Spanish).Search in Google Scholar

COIFORM. Colegio de Ingenieros Forestales de Misiones, Argentina. 2017. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.coiform.com.ar [Accessed 19 November 2017]. (In Spanish).Search in Google Scholar

Colcombet, L., Crechi, E., Keller, A., Pachas, N., Fassola, H., Lacorte, S., Esquivel, J. 2010. Preliminary comparison of financial and economic results of forestry, livestock and silvopastoral projects in Misiones. (Comparación preliminar de resultados financieros y económicos de proyectos forestales, ganaderos y silvopastoriles en Misiones). Acta 14, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. [WWW document]. – URL http://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/script-tmp-inta-resultadosfinancieros-economicos.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2016]. (In Spanish).Search in Google Scholar

Cox, J., Ross, S., Rubinstein, M. 1979. Option pricing: A simplified approach. – Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3), 229–263.10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Duku-Kaakyire, A., Nanang, D.M. 2004. Application of real options theory to forestry investment analysis. – Forest Policy and Economics, 6(6), 539–552.10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00003-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Fama, E., French, K. 2004. The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence. – Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 25–46.10.1257/0895330042162430Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Feenstra, R.C., Taylor, A.M. 2007. International Macroeconomics. Worth Publishers. 548 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Manley, B. 2013. How does real option value compare with Faustmann value in the context of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme? – Forest Policy and Economics, 30, 14–22.10.1016/j.forpol.2013.02.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Markowitz, H. 1991. Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. John Wiley & Sons, Massachusetts. 400 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Merton, R. 1973. The theory of rational options princing. – The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141–183.10.2307/3003143Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Milanesi, G., Woitschach, G., Broz, D. 2012. Application of the theory of real options to the determination of the optimal time of forest harvest. (Aplicación de la teoría de opciones reales a la determinación del momento óptimo de cosecha forestal). – Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, 44, 65–78. (In Portuguese).Search in Google Scholar

Monicault, L.A., Delvalle, P. 2009. Economic-financial evaluation of a silvopastoral system (SSP). National Institute of Agricultural Technology. (Evaluación Económico–Financiero de un Sistema Silvopastoril (SSP). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria). [WWW document]. – URL http://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/script-tmp-inta_evaluacin_econmicofinanciero_de_un_sist.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2016]. (In Spanish).Search in Google Scholar

Mun, J. 2002. Real options analysis: Tools and techniques for valuing strategic investment and decisions. John Wiley & Sons, Massachusetts. 386 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Olivera, E.B. 2011. Softwares for management and economic analysis of forest plantations. (Softwares para manejo e análise econômica de plantações florestais). Documento 216, Empresa Brasi leira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/898050/1/Doc216.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2016]. (In Portuguese).Search in Google Scholar

Peltola, J., Knapp, K.C. 2001. Recursive preferences in forest management. – Forest Science, 47(4), 455–465.Search in Google Scholar

Petrasek, S., Perez-Garcia, J.M. 2010. Valuation of timber harvest contracts as American call options with modified least-squares Monte Carlo algorithm. – Forest Science, 56(5), 494–504.Search in Google Scholar

Plantinga, A.J. 1998. The optimal timber rotation: An option value approach. – Forest Science, 44(2), 192–202.Search in Google Scholar

Rubinstein, M. 1994. Implied Binomial Trees. – Journal of Finance, 49(3), 771–818.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb00079.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sant’Anna, A.C., Nogueira, J.M. 2010. Economic valuation of environmental services of national forests. (Valoração econômica dos serviços ambientais de florestas nacionais). – Revista de Administração e Negócios da Amazônia, 2(2), 82–108. (In Portuguese).Search in Google Scholar

Smith, J. 2005. Alternative approach for solving real options problems. – Decision Analysis, 2(2), 89–102.Search in Google Scholar

Sun, C., Zhang, D. 2001. Assessing the financial perfor mance of forestry-related investment vehicles: Capital asset pricing model vs. arbitrage pricing theory. – American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 617–628.10.1111/0002-9092.00182Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Thomson, T.A. 1992. Optimal forest rotation when stumpage prices follow a diffusion process. – Land Economics, 68(3), 329–342.10.2307/3146380Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Trifonov, Y., Yashin, S., Koshelev, E. 2013. Upgrading corporate equipment as an Asian real option with constant business volatility. – International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(4), 76–89.Search in Google Scholar

Trigeorgis, L. 1995. Real options in capital investment: Models, strategies and applications. Praeger Publishers, California. 386 pp.Search in Google Scholar

Yao, W, Mei, B. 2015. Assessing forestry-related assets with the intertemporal capital asset pricing model. – Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 192–199.Search in Google Scholar

Yemshanov, D., McCarney, G.R., Hauer, G., Luckert (Marty), M.K., Unterschultz, J., McKenney, D.W. 2015. A real options-net present value approach to assessing land use change: A case study of afforestation in Canada. – Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 327–336.Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R. 2001. Combining forest-level analysis with options valuation approach – A new framework for assessing forestry investment. – Forest Science, 47(4), 475–483.Search in Google Scholar

Yin, R., Newman, D. 1997. When to cut a stand of trees? – Natural Resource Modeling, 10(3), 251–261.Search in Google Scholar