[Adermann, V. 2010. Estonia (National forest inventory report). – Tomppo, E., Gschwantner, T., Lawrence, M., McRoberts, R.E. (eds.). National forest inventories: pathways for common reporting (NFI reports section). Heidelberg, Springer, 171–184.]Search in Google Scholar
[Aguirre, O., Hui, G.Y., Gadow, K., Jiménez, J. 2003. An analysis of spatial forest structure using neighbourhood-based variables. – Forest Ecology and Management, 183, 137–145.]Search in Google Scholar
[Albert, M. 1999. Analysis of thinning-induced changes in stand structure and modelling of thinnings in mixed-species stands. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Forestry and Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen. 195 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anselin, L. 1996. The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association. – Fisher, M., Scholten, H., Unwin, D. (eds.). Spatial Analytical Perspectives on GIS. London, Taylor & Francis, 111–125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arbia, G., Benedetti, R., Espa, G. 1996. Effects of the MAUP on image classification. – Geographical Systems, 3, 123–141.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bellehumeur, C., Legendre, P., Marcotte, D. 1997. Variance and spatial scales in a tropical rain forest: changing the size of sampling units. – Plant Ecology, 130, 89–98.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bobiec, A. 2002. Living stands and dead wood in the Bialowieza forest: suggestions for restoration management. – Forest Ecology and Management, 165, 125–140.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boots, B.N., Getis, A. 1988. Point Pattern Analysis. Vol. 10. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 85 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Burgman, M.A., Incoll, W., Ades, P.K., Ferguson, I., Fletcher, T.D., Wohlers, A. 1994. Mortality models for mountain and alpine ash. – Forest Ecology and Management, 67, 319–327.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, J.Q., Song, B., Rudnicki, M., Moeur, M., Bible, K., North, M., Shaw, D.C., Franklin, J.F., Braun, D.M. 2004. Spatial relationship of biomass and species distribution in an old-growth Pseudotsuga-Tsuga forest. – Forest Science, 50, 364–375.]Search in Google Scholar
[Churchill, D.J., Larson, A.J., Dahlgreen, M.C., Franklin, J.F., Hessburg, P.F., Lutz, J.A. 2013. Restoring forest resilience: from reference spatial patterns to silvicultural prescriptions and monitoring. – Forest Ecology and Management, 291, 442–457.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, P.J., Evans, F.C. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbour as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. – Ecology, 35, 445–453.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, W.B., Spies, T.A., Bradshaw, G.A. 1990. Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer canopy structure. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 34, 167–178.]Search in Google Scholar
[Conkle, M. 1963. The determination of experimental plots size and shape in loblolly and slash pines. North California State University, School of Forestry. – Technology Report, 17, 51 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corona, P., Marchetti, M. 2007. Outlining multipurpose forest inventories to assess the ecosystem approach in forestry. – Plant Biosystem, 141, 243–251.]Search in Google Scholar
[Corona, P., Saracino, A., Leone, V. 1998. Plot size and shape for the early assessment of post-fire regeneration in Aleppo pine stands. – New Forests, 16, 213–220.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cressie, N.A. 1993. Statistics for spatial data. New York, John Wiley & Sons. 900 pp.10.1002/9781119115151]Search in Google Scholar
[Dale, M.R.T. 2000. Spatial patterns analysis in plant ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 326 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Diggle, P.J. 1983. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns. London, Academic Press. 148 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Donnelly, K. 1978. Simulation to determine the variance and edge effect of total nearest neighbour distance. – Hodder, I.R. (ed.). Simulation methods in archaeology. Cambridge University Press, London, 91–95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eid, T., Tuhus, E. 2001. Models for individual tree mortality in Norway. – Forest Ecology and Management, 154, 69–84.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fajardo, A., Gonzalez, M.E. 2009. Replacement patterns and species coexistence in an Andean Araucaria-Nothofagus forest. – Journal of Vegetation Science, 20, 1176–1190.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischer, A., Lindner, M., Abs, C., Lasch, P. 2002. Vegetation dynamics in central European forest ecosystems (near-natural as well as managed) after storm events. – Folia Geobotanica, 37, 17–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Franklin, J.F., Spies, T.A., Van Pelt, R., Carey, A.B., Thornburgh, D.A., Berg, D.R., Lindenmayer, D.B., Harmon, M.E., Keeton, W.S., Shaw, D.C., Bible, K., Chen, J. 2002. Disturbances and structural development of natural forest ecosystems with silvicultural implications, using Douglasfir forests as an example. – Forest Ecology and Management, 155, 399–423.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frazer, G.W., Magnussen, S., Wulder, M.A., Niemann, K.O. 2011. Simulated impact of sample plot size and co-registration error on the accuracy and uncertainty of LiDAR-derived estimates of forest stand biomass. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(2), 636–649.]Search in Google Scholar
[Freese, F. 1960. Testing accuracy. – Forest Science, 6(2), 139–145.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frolking, S., Palace, M., Clark, D.B., Chambers, J.Q., Shugart, H.H., Hurtt, G.C. 2009. Forest disturbance and recovery – A general review in the context of space-borne remote sensing of impacts on aboveground biomass and canopy structure. – Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, G00E02.]Search in Google Scholar
[Füldner, K. 1995. Mixed stands structure description. (Zur Strukturbeschreibung in Mischbeständen). – Forstarchiv, 66, 235–240. (In German).]Search in Google Scholar
[von Gadow, K., Hui, G.Y. 1999. Modelling Forest Development. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 213 pp.10.1007/978-94-011-4816-0]Search in Google Scholar
[von Gadow, K., Hui, G. 2002. Characterizing forest spatial structure and diversity. – Bjoerk, L. (ed.). Proceedings IUFRO International Workshop: Sustainable Forestry in Temperate Regions. Lund, Sweden, 20–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[von Gadow, K., Hui, G.Y., Albert, M. 1998. The neighbourhood pattern – a new parameter for describing forest structure. – Das Austrian Journal of Forest Science / Centralblatt für das gesamte Forstwesen, 115, 1–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gleichmar, W., Gerold, D. 1998. Indexes for the description of the horizontal tree distribution. (Indizes zur Charakterisierung der horizontalen Baumverteilung). – Forstwissenschaftliches Central blatt, 117, 69–80. (In German).10.1007/BF02832960]Search in Google Scholar
[Gray, A. 2003. Monitoring stand structure in mature coastal Douglas-fir forests: effect of plot size. – Forest Ecology and Management, 175, 1–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haapanen, M. 1992. Effect of plot size and shape on the efficiency of progeny tests. – Silva Fennica, 26, 201–209.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hui, G.Y., von Gadow, K. 2002. The optimal standard angle of the uniform angle index. – Zeitschrift für Forstwirtschaft und Forstwissenschaft, 173, 173–177. (In German).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hynynen, J., Niemisto, P., Vihera-Aarnio, A., Brunner, A., Hein, S., Velling, P. 2010. Silviculture of birch (Betula pendula Roth and Betula pubescens Ehrh.) in northern Europe. – Forestry, 83,103–119.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, F.A. Hixon H.J. 1952. The most efficient size and shape of plot to use for cruising in oldgrowth Douglas-fir timber. – Forestry, 50, 17–20.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kint, V., De Wulf, R., Lust, N. 2004. Evaluation of sampling methods for the estimation of structural indices in forest stands. – Ecological Modelling, 180, 461–476.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kint, V., Lust, N., Ferris, R., Olsthoorn, A.F.M. 2000. Quantification of forest stand structure applied to Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests. – Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, Fuera de Serie, 1, 147–163.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kint, V., Van Meirvenne, M., Nachtergale, L., Geudens, G., Lust, N. 2003. Spatial methods for quantifying forest stand structure development: a comparison between nearest-neighbor indices and variogram analysis. – Forest Science, 49, 36–49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kiviste, A., Hordo, M., Kangur, A., Kardakov, A., Laarmann, D., Lilleleht, A., Metslaid, S., Sims, A., Korjus, H. 2015. Monitoring and modeling of forest ecosystems: the Estonian Network of Forest Research Plots. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 62, 26–38.]Search in Google Scholar
[Král, K., Valtera, M., Janík, D., Šamonil, P., Vrška, T. 2014. Spatial variability of general stand characteristics in central European beech-dominated natural stands-Effects of scale. – Forest Ecology and Management, 328, 353–364.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuusk, A., Lang, M., Kuusk, J. 2013. Database of optical and structural data for the validation of forest radiative transfer models. –Kokhanovsky, A.A. (ed.). Radiative Transfer and Optical Properties of Atmosphere and Underlying Surface. Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer, 109–148.]Search in Google Scholar
[van Laar, A., Akça, A. 2007. Forest mensuration. Springer, Dordrecht. 418 pp.10.1007/978-1-4020-5991-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Law, R., Illian, J., Burslem, DFRP., Gratzer, G., Gunatilleke, CVS., Gunatilleke, IAUN. 2009. Ecological information fromspatial patterns of plants: insights from point process theory. – Ecology, 97, 616–628.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lingua, E., Cherubini, P., Motta, R., Nola, P. 2008. Spatial structure along an altitudinal gradient in the Italian central Alps suggests competition and facilitation among coniferous species. – Journal of Vegetation Science, 19, 425–436.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lombardi, F., Marchetti, M., Corona, P., Merlini, P., Chirici, G., Tognetti, R., Burrascano, S., Alivernini, A., Puletti, N. 2015. Quantifying the effect of sampling plot size on the estimation of structural indicators in old-growth forest stands. – Forest Ecology and Management, 346, 89–97.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loo-Dinkins, J., Tauer, C. 1987. Statistical efficiency of six progeny tests field designs on three loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) site types. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 1066–1070.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, G.L., Ek, AR., Monserud, R.A. 1977. Control of plot edge bias in forest stand growth simulation models. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 7, 100–105.]Search in Google Scholar
[Næsset, E., Bollandsås, O.M., Gobakken, T., Solberg, S., McRoberts, R.E. 2015. The effects of field plot size on model-assisted estimation of aboveground biomass change using multitemporal interferometric SAR and airborne laser scanning data. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 168, 252–264.10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Naumburg, E., DeWald, L.E. 1999. Relationships between Pinus ponderosa forest structure, light characteristics, and understory gRAMInoid species presence and abundance. – Forest Ecology and Management, 124, 205–215.]Search in Google Scholar
[Navarro-Cerrillo, R.M., Manzanedo, R.D., Bohorque, J., Sánchez, R., Sánchez, J., Miguel, S.d., Solano, D., Qarro, M., Griffith, D., Palacios, G. 2013. Structure and spatio-temporal dynamics of cedar forests along a management gradient in the Middle Atlas. Morocco. – Forest Ecology and Management, 289, 341–353.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palace, W.M., Sullivan, B.F., Ducey, M.J., Treuhaft, N.R., Herrick, C., Shimbo, J.Z., Mota-E-Silva, J. 2015. Estimating forest structure in a tropical forest using field measurements, a synthetic model and discrete return lidar data. – Remote Sensing of Environment, 161, 1–11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Penttinen, A., Stoyan, D., Henttonen, H.M. 1992. Marked point process in forest statistics. – Forest Science, 38, 806–824.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pommerening, A. 2002. Approaches to quantifying forest structures. – Forestry, 75, 305–324.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pommerening, A., von Gadow, K. 2000. Among the possibilities and limits of detection structure with forest inventories. (Zu den Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Strukturerfassung mit Waldinventuren). – Forst und Holz, 55, 622–631. (In German).]Search in Google Scholar
[Pommerening, A., Stoyan, D. 2006. Edge-correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1723–1739.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pommerening, A., Stoyan, D. 2006. Edge-correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1723–1739.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reich, R.M., Arvanitis, L.G. 1992. Sampling unit, spatial distribution of trees, and precision. – Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, 9, 3–6.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rice, A.H., Pyle, E.H., Saleska, S.R., Hutyra, L., Camargo, P.B., Portilho, K., Dulcyana, F.M., Steven, C.W. 2004. Carbon balance and vegetation dynamics in an old-growth Amazonian forest. – Ecological Applications, 14, 55–71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ripley, B.D. 1981. Spatial statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.10.1002/0471725218]Search in Google Scholar
[Salk, C.F., Chazdon, R.L., Andersson, K.A. 2013. Detecting landscape-level changes intree biomass and biodiversity: methodological constraints and challenges of plot-based approaches. – Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 43, 799–808.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sallabanks, R., Riggs, R.A., Cobb, L.E. 2002. Bird use of forest structural classes in grand fir forests of the Blue Mountains, Oregon. – Forest Science. 48, 311–321.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tomppo, E. 1986. Models and methods for analysing spatial patterns of trees. – Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae, 138, 65 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Travaglini, D., Fattorini, L., Barbati, A., Bottalico, F., Corona, P., Ferretti, M., Chirici, G. 2013. Towards a sampling strategy for the assessment of forest condition at European level: combining country estimates. – Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185, 3255–3268.]Search in Google Scholar
[Unger, M., Homeier, J., Leuschner, C. 2013. Relationships among leaf area index, below-canopy light availability and tree diversity along a transect from tropical lowland to montane forests in NE Ecuador. – Tropical Ecology, 54, 33–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wrigley, N., Holt, T., Steel, D., Tranmer, M. 1996. Analyzing, modeling, and resolving the ecological fallacy. – Longley, P., Batty, M. (eds.). Spatial Analysis: Modeling in GIS Environment. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 23–30.]Search in Google Scholar
