Open Access

Effects of traditional Chinese medicine nursing combined with conventional nursing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis


Cite

Figure 1

Flow chart of eligible studies.
Flow chart of eligible studies.

Figure 2

Forest plots of analysis of study group versus control group for clinical efficacy. The results are presented as individual and pooled ORs and 95% CIs. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.
Forest plots of analysis of study group versus control group for clinical efficacy. The results are presented as individual and pooled ORs and 95% CIs. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.

Figure 3

Forest plots of subgroup analysis of stable COPD versus AECOPD for clinical efficacy. The results are presented as individual and pooled ORs and 95% CIs. AECOPD = acute exacerbation of COPD; CI = confidence interval; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; OR = odds ratio.
Forest plots of subgroup analysis of stable COPD versus AECOPD for clinical efficacy. The results are presented as individual and pooled ORs and 95% CIs. AECOPD = acute exacerbation of COPD; CI = confidence interval; COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; OR = odds ratio.

Figure 4

Funnel plots of the evaluation of potential publication bias in the efficacy of TCM nursing combined with conventional nursing in patients with COPD. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; s.e. = standard error; TCM = traditional Chinese medicine.
Funnel plots of the evaluation of potential publication bias in the efficacy of TCM nursing combined with conventional nursing in patients with COPD. COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; s.e. = standard error; TCM = traditional Chinese medicine.

Results of meta-analysis of outcomes

OutcomesNumber of studiesNumber of patientsPooled WMD95% CI of pooled WMDPHeterogeneity
Study groupControl groupI2 (%)P
SGRQ scores4273273–15.06–16.56 to 13.550.0000.00.990
FEV1 value63713710.290.13 to 0.450.00095.70.000
FEV1/FVC value115885864.952.71 to 7.190.00096.20.000
FEV1% value45115119.204.71 to 13.680.00097.80.000
FEV1 predicted value41921904.133.44 to 4.820.0000.00.725
Hospital stay4259259–3.96–5.79 to 1.940.00095.90.000

Study characteristics and inclusion criteria

ArticlesStudy periodCaseNumber in study groupNumber in control groupOutcomes

1= SGRQ scores; 2= FEV1 Value; 3= FEV1/FVC Value; 4= FEV1% value; 5= FEV1 predicted value; 6= hospital stay; 7= clinical efficacy.

Quality assessment
Dai 201652012/11–2015/12COPD202013
Li 201562013/6–2015/6Stable COPD50501,3, 53
He 201472010/12–2013/10Stable COPD60601,3, 53
Zheng et al 201482011/1–2012/12Stable COPD1431431,2, 3, 54
Peng 200992007/1–2009/1Stable COPD50502, 33
Chen et al 201510Stable COPD53532, 3, 74
Li 2015112014/1–2014/12Stable COPD434324
Zuo et al 2015122013/4–2014/3COPD36362, 33
Pei et al 2015132014/6–2015/6Stable COPD46462, 3, 74
Shi et al 2014142013/5–2013/12Acute exacerbation COPD15153, 44
Liu 2014152013/1–2014/1COPD53533, 44
Wang et al 2015162013/7–2014/7COPD40383, 54
Huang 2016172012/10–2014/10Stable COPD42423, 53
Li et al 2013182008/1–2013/2Stable COPD3003004, 73
Fu et al 2014192012/1–2013/12Acute exacerbation COPD505064
Lei 20 1 4202012/8–2014/2COPD1001006, 74
Liang et al 2010212008/1–2009/1Acute exacerbation COPD454564
Pan 2013222011/4–2012/3Acute exacerbation COPD64646, 74
Fan 201 5232013/5–2015/5COPD404073
Zhang et al 2013242011/1–2013/1Acute exacerbation COPD272774
Nie et al 2012252011/1–2011/11Acute exacerbation COPD12012073
Han 201 5262013/9–2014/10Acute exacerbation COPD606074
eISSN:
2544-8994
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Assistive Professions, Nursing