A code reviewer assignment model incorporating the competence differences and participant preferences

[1] Chen Y., Fan Z. P., A Method for proposal-reviewer assignment in proposal review based on the match degree of research discipline, Chinese Journal of Management Science, 19, 2, 2011, 169-173 (in Chinese).Search in Google Scholar

[2] Cook W. D., Golany B., Kress M., Penn M., Raviv T., Optimal allocation of proposals to reviewers to facilitate effective ranking, Management Science, 51, 4, 2005, 655-661.10.1287/mnsc.1040.0290Search in Google Scholar

[3] Devito Da Cunha A., Greathead D., Does personality matter? An analysis of code-review ability, Communications of the ACM, 50, 5, 2007, 109-112.10.1145/1230819.1241672Search in Google Scholar

[4] Drexl M., Irnich S., Solving elementary shortest-path problems as mixed-integer programs, OR spectrum, 36, 2, 2014, 281-296.10.1007/s00291-012-0302-7Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fagan E., Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development, IBM System Journal, 3, 1976, 182-211.10.1147/sj.153.0182Search in Google Scholar

[6] Karimzadehgan M., Zhai C. X., Integer linear programming for constrained multi-aspect committee review assignment, Information Processing and Management, 48, 4, 2012, 725-740.10.1016/j.ipm.2011.09.004Search in Google Scholar

[7] Li X., Using peer review to assess coding standards–a case study, In Frontiers in education conference, 36th annual, San Diego, CA, USA, 2006, 9-14.10.1109/FIE.2006.322572Search in Google Scholar

[8] Li X., Incorporating a code review process into the assessment, In the 20th Annual Conference of the National Advisory Committee on Computing Qualifications, Nelson, New Zealand, 2007, 125-131.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Li X., Watanabe T., Automatic paper-to-reviewer assignment based on the matching degree of the reviewers, Procedia Computer Science, 22, 2013, 633-642.10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.144Search in Google Scholar

[10] Long C., Wong R. C. W., Peng Y., Ye L., On good and fair paper-reviewer assignment, In IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’2013), 2013, 1145-1150.10.1109/ICDM.2013.13Search in Google Scholar

[11] Martello S., Pulleyblank W. R., Toth P., de Werra D., Balanced optimization problems, Operations Research Letters, 3, 5, 1984, 275-278.10.1016/0167-6377(84)90061-0Search in Google Scholar

[12] Meyer B., Design and code reviews in the age of the internet, Communications of the ACM, 51, 9, 2008, 66-71.10.1145/1378727.1378744Search in Google Scholar

[13] Saaty T. L., How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process, European journal of operational research, 48, 1, 1990, 9-26.10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-ISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Sun Y. H., Ma J., Fan Z. P., Wang J., A hybrid knowledge and model approach for reviewer assignment, Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2, 2008, 817-824.10.1016/j.eswa.2006.10.021Search in Google Scholar

[15] Tayal D. K., Saxena P. C., Sharma A., Khanna G., Gupta S., New method for solving reviewer assignment problem using type-2 fuzzy sets and fuzzy functions, Applied intelligence, 40, 1, 2014, 54-73.10.1007/s10489-013-0445-5Search in Google Scholar

[16] Topping K., Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities, Review of Educational Research, 68, 3, 1998, 249-276.10.3102/00346543068003249Search in Google Scholar

[17] Tsang E. W. K., Is this referee really my peer? A challenge to the peer-review process, Journal of Management Inquiry, 22, 2, 2013, 166-171.10.1177/1056492612461306Search in Google Scholar

[18] Turner S. A., Peer review in CS2: the effects on attitudes, engagement, and conceptual learning, Doctoral Dissertation of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2009, Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-08272009-003738/unrestricted/Turner_SA_D_2009.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[19] Wang F., Shi N., Chen B., A comprehensive survey of the reviewer assignment problem, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making, 9, 4, 2010, 645-668.10.1142/S0219622010003993Search in Google Scholar

[20] Wang Y. Q., Li H., Feng Y. Q., Jiang Y., Liu Y., Assessment of programming language learning based on peer code review model: Implementation and experience report, Computers & Education, 59, 2, 2012, 412-422.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.007Search in Google Scholar

[21] Wang Y. Q., Li H., Sun Y. N., Jiang Y., Yu J., Learning outcomes of programming language courses based on peer code review model, In the 6th International Conference on Computer Science & Education, August 3-5, SuperStar Virgo, Singapore, ThC 5.47, 2011, 751-754.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Wang Y. Q., Li Y. J., Collins M., Liu P. J., Process improvement of peer code review and behavior analysis of its participants, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 40, 1, 2008, 107-111.10.1145/1352322.1352171Search in Google Scholar

[23] Wang Y. Q., Yang F., Liu P. J., Collins M., Quality assurance of peer code review process: A computer science based strategy, Zhongshan Daxue Xuebao/Acta Scientiarum Natralium Universitatis Sunyatseni, 46(suppl), 2007, 116-120.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Xu Y. H., Ma J., Sun Y. H., Hao G., Xu W., Zhao D. T., A decision support approach for assigning reviewers to proposals, Expert Systems with Applications, 37, 10, 2010, 6948-6956.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.03.027Search in Google Scholar