Offering Authentic Learning Activities in the Context of Open Resources and Real-World Goals: A Study of Self-motivated Online Music Learning

1. Boitshwarelo, B. (2011). Proposing an integrated research framework for connectivism: Utilising theoretical synergies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 161-179.10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.881Search in Google Scholar

2. Bresler, L. (1993). The social organization of achievement: A case study of a music theory class. The Curriculum Journal, 4(1), 37-58.10.1080/0958517930040104Search in Google Scholar

3. Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 17-32. Retrieved from http://www.educause.eduSearch in Google Scholar

4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.10.3102/0013189X018001032Search in Google Scholar

5. Burnard, P. (2007). Reframing creativity and technology: Promoting pedagogic change in music education. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 1(1), 37-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/jmte.1.1.37_1Search in Google Scholar

6. Cape Town Open Education Declaration (2007). Read the Declaration. Retrieved from http://www.capetowndeclaration.org/read-the-declarationSearch in Google Scholar

7. Carson, S. (2006). 2005 Program evaluation findings report. MIT OpenCourseWare. Retrieved from https://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/05_Prog_Eval_Report_Final.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

8. Carson, S. (2009). 2009 Program Evaluation Findings Summary. MIT OpenCourseWare. Retrieved from http://ocw.mit.edu/ans7870/global/09_Eval_Summary.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

9. Crawford, R. (2014). A multidimensional/non-linear teaching and learning model: Teaching and learning music in an authentic and holistic context. Music Education Research, 16(1), 50-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2013.81262710.1080/14613808.2013.812627Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Fletcher, G., Schaffhauser, D, & Levin, D. (2012). Out of Print: Reimagining the K-12 Textbook in a Digital Age. Washington, DC: State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA).Search in Google Scholar

11. Godin, S. (2012). Stop stealing dreams: (What is school for?). Retrieved from http://www.squidoo.com/seth#module157797563Search in Google Scholar

12. Green, L. (2002). How popular musicians learn: A way ahead for music education. Farnham, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Search in Google Scholar

13. Hargreaves, D. J., & Marshall, N. A. (2003). Developing identities in music education. Music Education Research, 5(3), 263-274.10.1080/1461380032000126355Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Harley, D. (2008). Why understanding the use and users of open education matters. In J. S. Brown, T. Iiyoshi, & M. S. V. Kumar (Eds.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge (pp. 197-211). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

15. Heron, J., & Reason, P. (2006). The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research ‘with’ rather than ‘on’ people. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research (Concise paperback ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

16. Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

17. Knowles, M., & Associates. (1984). Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Search in Google Scholar

18. Kop, R., Fournier, H., & Mak, J. S. F. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance or a pedagogy to support human beings: Participant support on massive open online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(7), 74-9310.19173/irrodl.v12i7.1041Search in Google Scholar

19. Lee, S. D. (2008). The gates are shut: Technical and cultural barriers to open education. In T. Iiyoshi & M.S.V. Kumar (Eds.), Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

20. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality (M. J. Hall, Trans.). Retrieved from http://www.marxists.org/archive/leontev/works/1978/Search in Google Scholar

21. Lilliestam, L. (1996). On Playing by Ear. Popular Music, 15(2), 195-216.10.1017/S0261143000008114Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22. Lysloff, R. T. A. (2003). Musical community on the Internet: An on-line ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 18(2), 233-263.10.1525/can.2003.18.2.233Search in Google Scholar

23. McAndrew, P., dos Santos, A. I., Lane, A., Godwin, S., Okada, A., Wilson, T., Connolly, T., Ferreira, G., Buckingham Shum, S., Bretts, J., & Webb, R. (2008). OpenLearn: Research Report 2006-2008. Milton Keynes: OpenLearn, The Open University. Retrieved from http://www3.open.ac.uk/events/6/2009727_62936_o1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

24. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Activity theory and human-computer-interaction. In Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 7-16). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

25. Nettl, B. (1985). The Western impact on world music: Change, adaptation, and survival. New York, NY: Schirmer Books.Search in Google Scholar

26. Peters, J. M., Taylor, J. E., & Doi, M. M. (2009). Self-directed learning and action research. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 6(2), 23-39.Search in Google Scholar

27. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Action Research (concise paperback ed.) London: Sage Publications Ltd.Search in Google Scholar

28. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

29. Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2013). Podcasting for language learning through iTunes U: The learner’s view. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 74-93.Search in Google Scholar

30. Schmidt-Jones, C. (2012). An open education resource supports a diversity of inquiry-based learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 1-16.10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1141Search in Google Scholar

31. Schmidt-Jones, C. (2016a). An online participatory action research inquiry into online inquiry-based music learning (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/90449Search in Google Scholar

32. Schmidt-Jones, C. (2016b). Barriers to self-motivated conceptual music learning: Activity theory as a framework for comparing dissimilar cases. Music Education Research, 16(2), doi: 10.1080/14613808.2016.1249362Search in Google Scholar

33. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman. Eds. A. R. Luria, M. Lopez-Morillas, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch, Trans.) Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

34. Waldron, J. (2009). Exploring a virtual music ‘community of practice’: Informal music learning on the Internet. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 2(2-3), 97-112. doi: 10.1386/jmte.2.2-3.97_1Search in Google Scholar

35. Welch, G. F. (2007). Addressing the multifaceted nature of music education: An activity theory research perspective. Research Studies in Music Education, 28, 23-37. 10.1177/1321103X070280010203Search in Google Scholar

36. Wells, G. (2001). Action, Talk, and Text: Learning and Teaching through Inquiry. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Search in Google Scholar

37. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803932Search in Google Scholar

38. Woody, R. H., & Lehmann, A. C. (2010). Student Musicians’ Ear-Playing Ability as a Function of Vernacular Music Experiences. Journal of Research in Music Education, 58(2), 101-115. doi: 10.1177/0022429410370785Search in Google Scholar