[1. Acee, T. W., Kim, H., Kim, H. J., Kim, J. I., Chu, H. N. R., Kim, M., & Wicker, F. W. (2010). Academic boredom in under-and over-challenging situations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 17-27.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.08.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[2. Andrews, J., Violato, C., Rabb, K., & Hollingsworth, M. (1994). A validity study of Biggs’ three factor model of learning approaches: A confirmatory factor analysis employing a Canadian sample. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 179-185.10.1111/j.2044-8279.1994.tb01093.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Aragon, S. R. (2003). Creating social presence in online environments. New directions for adult and continuing education, 100, 57-68.10.1002/ace.119]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Artino, A. R. (2008a). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260-270.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00258.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Artino, A. R. (2008b). Understanding satisfaction and continuing motivation in an online course: An extension of social cognitive, control-value theory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., & Gendron, M. (2011). Context in emotion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 286-290.10.1177/0963721411422522]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Berenson, R., Boyles, G., & Weaver, A. (2008). Emotional intelligence as a predictor of success in online learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2).10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.385]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Capdeferro, N., & Romero, M. (2012). Are online learners frustrated with collaborative learning experiences? The International review of research in open and distance learning, 13(2), 26-44.10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1127]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Chen, S. J., & Caropreso, E. J. (2004). Influence of personality on online discussion. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 3(2), 1-17.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Cho, M. H., & Heron, M. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning: the role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80-99.10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional Presence, Learning, and the Online Learning Environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 269-292.10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1234]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Conrad, D. L. (2002). Engagement, excitement, anxiety, and fear: Learners’ experiences of starting an online course. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 205-226.10.1207/S15389286AJDE1604_2]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Daughenbaugh, R., Ensminger, D., Frederick, L., & Surry, D. (2002). Does personality type effect online versus in-class course satisfaction? Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Mid South Instructional Technology Conference, April 7-9, Middle Tennessee State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Dimitrov, N. (2014). Intercultural Communication and Collaboration [Video file]. Retrieved July 6, 2015 from the University of Liverpool website https://elearning.uol.ohecampus.com/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_40_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_1509531_1%26url%3D]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.10.3102/00346543074001059]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 1-19.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 5-9.10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157-172.10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Gendron, M., Roberson, D., van der Vyver, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). Perceptions of emotion from facial expressions are not culturally universal: Evidence from a remote culture. Emotion, 14(2), 251-262.10.1037/a0036052]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181-192.10.1006/ceps.1996.0015]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[22. Hannon, J., & D’Netto, B. (2007). Cultural diversity online: student engagement with learning technologies. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(5), 418-432.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Hu, S., & Kuh, G.D. (2001). Being (Dis)Engaged in Educationally Purposeful Activities: The Influences of Student and Institutional Characteristics. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference. Seattle, WA, 10-14 April.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Huang, C. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 23(3), 359-388.10.1007/s10648-011-9155-x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[25. Kang, M., & Im, T. (2013). Factors of learner-instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(3), 292-301.10.1111/jcal.12005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[26. Kher, N. M., Molstad, S., & Donahue, R. (1999). Using humor in the college classroom to enhance teaching effectiveness in ‘dread courses’. College Student Journal, 33, 400-406.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Krause, K. & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ Engagement in First-Year University. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493-505.10.1080/02602930701698892]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Kuh, G .D. (2009). What Student Affairs Professionals Need to Know about Student Engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706.10.1353/csd.0.0099]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Lee, I. S. (2011). Emotion, emotional intelligence, and e-learning. Online proceeding of the 9th International Conference for Media in Education 2011 of KAEIM & JAEIMS, 1-4. Retrieved June]Search in Google Scholar
[30, 2014, from http://dasan.sejong.ac.kr/~inlee/set/set/articles/ICoME2011_K_14.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593-618.10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Liaw, S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51, 864-873.10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.005]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 313-327.10.1080/02796015.2002.12086158]Search in Google Scholar
[33. LoSchiavo, F. M., & Shatz, M. A. (2005). Enhancing online instruction with humor. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 247-250.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Nelson, N. L., & Russell, J. A. (2013). Universality revisited. Emotion Review, 5, 8-15.10.1177/1754073912457227]Search in Google Scholar
[35. O’Regan, K. (2003). Emotion and e-learning. Journal of Asynchronous learning networks, 7(3), 78-92.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational Psychology of Human Development- Advances in Psychology. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational psychology review, 18(4), 315-341.10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[38. Pekrun, R., Cusack, A., Murayama, K., Elliot, A. J., & Thomas, K. (2014). The power of anticipated feedback: Effects on students’ achievement goals and achievement emotions. Learning and Instruction, 29, 115-124.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.09.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[39. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 531-549.10.1037/a0019243]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[41. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ selfregulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[42. Pekrun, R., & Stephens, E. J. (2010). Achievement emotions: A control-value approach. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(4), 238-255.10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00259.x]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.) Upper Saddle River, N.J: Merrill Prentice Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Rienties, B., & Rivers, B. A. Measuring and Understanding Learner Emotions: Evidence and Prospects. LACE Project - Learning Analytics Review 1. Retrieved December 10, 2014, from the http://www.laceproject.eu/publications/learning-analytics-and-emotions.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Risquez, A., & Sanchez-Garcia, M. (2012). The jury is still out: Psychoemotional support in peer e-mentoring for transition to university. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(3), 213-221.10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.11.003]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Crosscultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 2408-2412.10.1073/pnas.0908239106]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Shatz, M. A., & LoSchiavo, F. M. (2006). Bringing life to online instruction with humor. Radical Pedagogy, 8(2), 8.]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Shea, P. (2006). A study of students’ sense of learning community in online environments. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 35-44.]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Shen, L., Wang, M., & Shen, R. (2009). Affective e-Learning: Using “Emotional” Data to Improve Learning in Pervasive Learning Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 176-189.]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Trowler, V. (2010). Student engagement literature review. York: Higher Education Academy.]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Vuorela, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2004). Experienced emotions, emotion regulation and student activity in a web-based learning environment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 423-436.10.1007/BF03173219]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[52. Wang, Y., Peng, H., Huang, R., Hou, Y., & Wang, J. (2008). Characteristics of distance learners: research on relationships of learning motivation, learning strategy, self-efficacy, attribution and learning results. Open Learning, 23(1), 17-28.10.1080/02680510701815277]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Yang, C. C., Tsai, I., Kim, B., Cho, M. H., & Laffey, J. M. (2006). Exploring the relationships between students' academic motivation and social ability in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(4), 277-286.10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.002]Search in Google Scholar
[54. You, J. (2012). The structural relationship among task value, self-efficacy, goal structure, and academic emotions for promoting self-regulated learning in e-learning course. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, 16(4), 61-77.]Search in Google Scholar
[55. You, J. W., & Kang, M. (2014). The role of academic emotions in the relationship between perceived academic control and self-regulated learning in online learning. Computers & Education, 77, 125-133.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.018]Search in Google Scholar
[56. You, J., Kang, M. & Pahng, P. (2013). Moderating Effects of Academic Emotions between Perceived Academic Control and Self-Regulated Learning in Online Courses. E-Learn, 2180-2188.]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 71-83.]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Zembylas, M. (2008). Adult learners’ emotions in online learning. Distance Education, 29(1), 71-87.10.1080/01587910802004852]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2]Search in Google Scholar