Peer Observation For Online Distance Learning Tutors: Creating The Conditions For Effective Peer Exchange

1. Baxter, J-A. (2012). The impact of professional learning on the teaching identities of higher education lecturers. In European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 2012(2). Available online at http://www.eurodl.org/index.php?p=archives&year=2012&halfyear=2&article=527Search in Google Scholar

2. Bennett, S.; Barp, D. (2008). Peer observation – a case for doing it online. In Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5), (pp. 559-570). Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562510802334871Search in Google Scholar

3. Bennett, S.; Marsh, D. (2002). Are we expecting tutors to run before they can walk? In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39(1), (pp. 14–20).Search in Google Scholar

4. Bennett, S.; Lee, S.; Lynch, P.; Howard, L. (2010). COOLAID (Collaborative Observation in the On-Line Environment for enhancement across Institutional Divides. HEA Evidence Net. Available online at http://www-new1.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/learningandtech/University_of_Hull_Briefing_Report_26_May_2010.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

5. Bennett, S.; Santy, J. (2009). A window on our teaching practice: Enhancing individual online teaching quality though online peer observation and support. A UK case study. In Nurse Education in Practice, 9(6), (pp.403-406).10.1016/j.nepr.2009.01.019Search in Google Scholar

6. Bowskill, N.; Foster, J.; Lally, V.; McConnell, D. (2000). Networked professional development: Issues and strategies in current practice. In The International Journal for Academic Development, 5(2), (pp.93-106).10.1080/13601440050200707Search in Google Scholar

7. Carroll, C.; O’Loughlin, D. (2013). Peer observation of teaching: enhancing academic engagement for new participants. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(4), (pp. 446-456). Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.778067Search in Google Scholar

8. Cohen, L.; Mannion, L. (1994). Research Methods in Education (4th ed.). London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

9. Donnelly, R. (2007). Perceived Impact of Peer Observation of Teaching in Higher Education. In International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), (pp.117-129). Available online at http://arrow.dit.ie/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1023&context=ltcartSearch in Google Scholar

10. Gaebel, M.; Kupriyanova, V.; Morais, R; Colucci, E. (2014). E-learning in European higher education institutions: results of a mapping survey conducted in October-December 2013. European University Association Publications: Brussels. Available online at http://eua.be/Libraries/Publication/e-learning_survey.sflb.ashxSearch in Google Scholar

11. Gallardo, M.; Heiser, S.; Nicolson, M. (2011). Teacher development in blended contexts. In M. Nicolson, L. Murphy & M. Southgate (eds.), Language teaching in blended contexts, (pp. 219–231). Edinburgh: Dunedin Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

12. Gillham, B. (2000). The Research Interview. London: Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

13. Goldsmith, D.J.; Rogers-Ward, C. (2003). An Interactive Peer Examination of Online Teaching: Experienced and Novice Instructors Explore Best Practices. In Connecticut Distance Learning Consortium.Search in Google Scholar

14. Gosling, D. (2002). Models of peer observation of teaching. Learning and Teaching Support Network (LTSN) Generic Centre. Available online at http://learningandteaching.vu.edu.au/teaching_practice/improve_my_teaching/evaluation_support_for_my_teaching/Resources/id200_Models_of_Peer_Observation_of_Teaching.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

15. Harper, F.; Nicolson, M. (2013). Online peer observation: its value in teacher professional development, support and well-being. In International Journal for Academic Development, 18(3), (pp. 264-275). Available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2012.682159Search in Google Scholar

16. Hauck, M.; Stickler, U. (2006). What does it take to teach online? In Calico Journal, 23(3), (pp.463-475). Available online at http://www.equinoxpub.com/journals/index.php/CALICO/article/view/23153Search in Google Scholar

17. Hsieh, H-F.; Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. In Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), (pp.1277-1288).10.1177/1049732305276687Search in Google Scholar

18. Kirkwood, A.; Price, L. (2012). Missing: Evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Institute of Educational Technology, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK. Available online at http://www.lth.se/fileadmin/lth/genombrottet/Missing_-_a_scholarly_approach-HO.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

19. McMahon, T.; Barrett, T.; O’Neill, G. (2007). Using observation of teaching to improve quality: Finding your way through the muddle of competing conceptions, confusion of practice and mutually exclusive intentions. In Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), (pp.499–511).10.1080/13562510701415607Search in Google Scholar

20. McWilliam, E. (2005). Unlearning pedagogy. In Journal of Learning Design 1(1), (pp.1-11).10.5204/jld.v1i1.2Search in Google Scholar

21. Nichols, M. (2007). Institutional perspectives: The challenges of e-learning diffusion. In British Journal of educational technology, 39(4), (pp.598-609).Search in Google Scholar

22. Nutbeam, D. (2013). Keynote presentation: ‘Massively Open Online Courses: Internationalising UK Higher Education Through Technology’. Inside Government: Enhancing Further and Higher Education Through Mobile Technology, Thursday 11 July 2013, London.Search in Google Scholar

23. Online Learning Task Force (2011). Collaborate to compete. Seizing the opportunity of online learning for UK higher education. Report to HEFCE by the Online Learning Task Force. Available online at http://www.hefce.ac.uk/media/hefce1/pubs/hefce/2011/1101/11_01.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

24. QAA (2013). David Willetts’ address at ‘We need to talk about Quality: MOOCs’, 8 July 2013. In QAA website. Available online at http://www.qaa.ac.uk/publications/podcasts/podcast?PubID=145Search in Google Scholar

25. Shortland, S. (2007). Participation, justice and trust within developmental peer observation of teaching: a model and research agenda. In The International Journal of Management Education, 6(1), (pp.27-37).Search in Google Scholar

26. Shortland, S. (2010). Feedback within peer observation: Continuing professional development and unexpected consequences. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47, (pp. 295-304).10.1080/14703297.2010.498181Search in Google Scholar

27. Swinglehurst, D.; Russell, J.; Greenhalgh, T. (2008). Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: An action research approach. In Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), (pp.383–393).10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00274.xSearch in Google Scholar

28. Tonkin, S.; Baker, J.D. (2003). Peer Coaching for Online Instruction: An Emerging Model for Faculty Development. Paper Presented at the 19th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Wisconsin.Search in Google Scholar