[Armstrong, L., Bailey, J., Julier, G. & Kimbell, L. (2014). Social design futures: HEI research and the AHRC. University of Brighton. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from http://eprints.brighton.ac.uk/13364/1/Social-Design-Report.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[Boguslaw, R. (1971). The design perspective in sociology. In W. Bell & J. Mau (Eds.), The Sociology of the Future (pp.240-258). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carey, J. (Ed.). (2000). The Faber book of utopias. London: Faber and Faber.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chaiklin, S., Hedegaard, M., & Jensen, U. (Eds.). (1999). Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches. Aarhus, DK: Aarhus University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Durkheim, E. (1960). The elementary forms of religious life. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (Original work published 1912)]Search in Google Scholar
[Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812774]Search in Google Scholar
[Holdsworth, N. (2011). Joan Littlewood’s theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Koskinen, I., & Hush, G. (2016). Utopian, molecular and sociological social design. International Journal of Design 10(1), 65-71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lektorsky, V. (Ed.). (1990). Activity: Theories, methodology & problems. Orlando, FL: Paul Deutsch Press, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leontʹev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.]Search in Google Scholar
[Littlewood, J. (1964). A laboratory of fun. New Scientists 22(14), 432-433.]Search in Google Scholar
[Littlewood, J. (1994). Joan’s book: The autobiography of Joan Littlewood. London: Methuen.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lobsinger, M. (2000). Cybernetic theory and the architecture of performance. In S. W. Goldhagen & R. Legault (Eds.). Anxious modernism (pp. 119-139). Montreal and Cambridge, MA: Canadian Centre for Architecture and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. A. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mathews, S. (2007a). From agit-prop to free space: The architecture of Cedric Price. London: Black Dog Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mathews, S. (2007b). Cedric Price as anti-architect. In T. Anstey, K. Grillner & R. Hughes (Eds.). Architecture and Authorship (pp. 142-147). London: Black Dog Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mills, C. W. (1959). The Sociological imagination. London: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peña, W. & Parshall, S. (2012). Problem seeking: An architectural programming primer (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Price, C. (2003). Cedric Price: The square book. London: Academy Editions; Chichester: John Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Price, C. & Littlewood, J. (1968). The Fun Palace. The Drama Review: TDR, Architecture/Environment, 12(3) 127-134.10.2307/1144360]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rawls, A. W. (2004). Epistemology and Practice: Durkheim’s The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiener, M. (1981). English culture and the decline of the industrial spirit, 1850-1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
