[Andersson E. 2006. Urban landscapes and sustainable cities. Ecol. Soc., 11, 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ash C., Jasny B.R., Roberts L., Stone R., Sugden A.M. 2008. Reimagining cities. Introduction. Science, 319 (5864).10.1126/science.319.5864.73918258888]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldocchi D.D., Hicks B.B., Camara P. 1987. A canopy stomatal resistance model for gaseous deposition to vegetated surfaces. Atm. Environ., 21: 91-101.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bettencourt L.M.A., West G. 2010. A unified theory of urban living. Nature, 467 (7318), 912-913. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/467912a.10.1038/467912a20962823]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolund P., Hunhammar S. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol. Econ., 29: 293-301.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark W.C. 2007. Sustainability science: a room of its own. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.10.1073/pnas.0611291104179426717284615]Search in Google Scholar
[Dawe N.A. 1996. Sprinting Toward Sustainabilit. Am. Forests, 22-30, 45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Escobedo F.J., Wagner J.E., Nowak D.J., De la Maza C.L., Rodríguez M., Crane D.E. 2008. Analyzing the cost effectiveness of Santiago, Chile’s policy of using urban forests to improve air quality. J. Environ. Manage., 86:148-157.10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.02917275162]Search in Google Scholar
[Fann N., Lamson A.D., Anenberg S.C., Wesson K., Risley D., Hubbell B.J. 2012. Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone. Risk Analysis, 32: 81-95.]Search in Google Scholar
[Giergiczny M. 2008. Value of a statistical life – Case of Poland. Environ. Res. Econ., 41(2): 209-221.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gomez-Baggethun E., Barton D.N. 2013. Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol. Econ., 86: 235-245.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gomez-Baggethun E., Gren D., Barton J., Langemeyer T., McPhearson P., O’Farrell E., Andersson E., Hamstead Z.. 2013. Urban ecosystem services. [in:] Elmqvist T., Fragkias M., Goodness J., Güneralp B., Marcotullio P., McDonald R.I., et al. (ed.) Urbanization: 175-251.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hubacek K., Kronenberg J. 2013. Synthesizing different perspectives on the value of urban ecosystem services. Landsc. Urban Plan., 109 (1), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.010.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuchcik M., Błażejczyk K., Milewski P., Szmyd J. 2014. Urban climate research in Warsaw: the results of microclimatic network measurements. Geogr. Pol., 87, 4: 491-504.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin N.A., Chappelka A.H., Loewenstein E.F., Keever G.J. 2012. Comparison of carbon storage, carbon sequestration, and air pollution removal by protected and maintained urban forests in Alabama, USA. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci., Ecosystem Serv. Manage., 8(3): 265-272.]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson E.G. 2003. A benefit-cost analysis of ten street tree species in Modesto, California, U.S. J. Arboriculture, 29(1): 1-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson E.G., Kendall A. 2014. A life cycle carbon dioxide inventory of the Million Trees Los Angeles program. Int. J. Life Cycle Assessment, 19(9): 1653-1665.10.1007/s11367-014-0772-8]Search in Google Scholar
[McPherson E.G., Simpson, J.R. 1999. Carbon dioxide reduction through urban forestry: guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-171. Albany.10.2737/PSW-GTR-171]Search in Google Scholar
[Murray F.J., Marsh L., Bradford P.A. 1994. New York State Energy Plan. vol. II: issue reports. Albany, NY: New York State Energy Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[Najwyższa Izba Kontroli, 2014. Ochrona powietrza przed zanieczyszczeniami. Available at https://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id,7764,vp,9732.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Northeast Regional Climate Center, 2012. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. NOWData. Ithaca, NY: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available at http://www.nrcc.cornell.edu/page_nowdata.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak D.J. 1994. Understanding the structure of urban forests. J. Forestry, 92(10): 42-46.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak D.J. Dwyer J.F. 2007. Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems. [In:] Kuser J. (ed.) Urban and Community Forestry in the Northeast. New York: Springer: 25-46.10.1007/978-1-4020-4289-8_2]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak D.J., Crane D.E. 2000. The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) Model: Quantifying urban forest structure and functions. [in:] Hansen M., Burk T. (ed.) Integrated tools for natural resources inventories in the 21st century. St. Paul: North Central Research Station: 714–720.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak D.J., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C. 2006. Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4: 115–123.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak D.J., Crane D.E., Stevens J.C., Hoehn R.E., Walton J.T. 2008. A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 34: 347–358.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nowak D.J., Hirabayashi S., Bodine A. 2014. Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States. Environ. Pollut., 193: 119-129.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pauleit S., Duhme F. 2000. GIS assessment of Munich’s urban forest structure for urban planning. J. Arboriculture, 26(3):133-141.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peper P.J., McPherson E.G., Simpson J.R., Shelly L., Gardner Vargas K.E., Xiao Q. 2007. New York Municipal Forest Resource Analysis. Technical Report. Center for Urban Forest Research. USDA Forest Service. Pacific Southwest Research Station. New York City.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pope C.A. III, Burnett R.T., Thun M.J., Calle E.E., Krewski D., Ito K. 2002. Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA 287(9): 1132-1141.10.1001/jama.287.9.1132403716311879110]Search in Google Scholar
[Preiss P., Friedrich R., Klotz V. 2008. Report on the procedure and data to generate. Project no: 502687, Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung (IER), Universität Stuttgart.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rogers K., Jarratt T., Hansford D. 2011. Torbay’s Urban Forest: Assessing urban forest effects and values. A report on the findings from the UK i-Tree Eco pilot project. Treeconomics, Exeter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenzweig C., Gaffin S., Parshall L. (eds.), 2006. Green Roofs in the New York Metropolitan Region. Research Report. Columbia Univ. Center for Climate Systems Research and NASA Goddard Inst. for Space Studies.]Search in Google Scholar
[Senta W., Dolatowski J. 2008. Dendrologia. Wyd. Nauk. PWN. Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[United Nations. 2012. World Urbanization Prospects. The 2011 Revision. New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[USDA Forest Service. 2003. Urban Forest Research: The case for large trees vs. small trees. Center for Urban Forest Research, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Davis, California.]Search in Google Scholar
[Żylicz T. 2010. Valuation of ecosystem services. An overview of world research. Ekonomia i Środowisko, 1:31-45.]Search in Google Scholar