[Atiqul Haq S.M., Vanwing T., Hens L. 2010. Perception, Environmental Degradation and Family Size Preference: a Context of Developing Countries. J. Sustain. Dev., 3 (4): 102-108.10.5539/jsd.v3n4p102]Search in Google Scholar
[Addams H., Proops J.L. (eds.) 2000. Social discourse and environmental policy: an application of Q methodology. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson B.A., Romani J.H., Phillips H. Wentzel M., Tlabela K. 2007. Exploring environmental perceptions, behaviors and awareness: water and water pollution in South Africa. Population Environ., 28: 133-161.10.1007/s11111-007-0038-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Armatas C.A. Venn T.J., Watson V.E. 2014. Applying Qmethodology to select and define attributes for nonmarket valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States. Ecol. Econ., 107: 447-456.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barber N., Taylor C., Strick S. 2009. Wine consumers’ environmental knowledge and attitudes: Influence on willingness to purchase. Int. J. Wine Res., 1. 59-72.]Search in Google Scholar
[Barry J., Proops J. 1999. Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecol. Econ., 28(3): 337-345.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bedrous A.V. 2010. Comparing Individual- and National- Level explanations of Environmental Attitudes. Sociology Theses, Dissertations & Student Research. Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologydiss/7.]Search in Google Scholar
[Behnood R., Anvaripour B., Jaafarzade Haghighi Fard, N., Farasati M. 2013. Application of Natural Sorbents in Crude Oil Adsorption. Iranian J. Oil & Gas Sci. Tech., 24: 01-11. http://ijogst.put.ac.ir.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown S.R. 1993. A primer on Q methodology. Operant subjectivity, 16 (3/4): 91-138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen X., Peterson M.N., Hull V., Lu C., Lee G., Hong D., Liu J. 2011. Effects of attitudinal and socio-demographic factors on pro-environmental behavior in urban China. Environ. Cons., 1-8. Foundation for Environmental Conservation.10.1017/S037689291000086X]Search in Google Scholar
[Chendo N.A. 2013. Managers’ Perceptions of Environmental Sustainability in Small and Medium Scale Enterprises (SMEs): Implication for Competitive Marketing Advantages for Sachet Water Manufacturers in Anambra State, Nigeria. European J. Bus. Manage., 5 (7): 186-195.]Search in Google Scholar
[Costanza R. 1989. What is Ecological Economics? Ecol. Econ., 1: l-710.1016/0921-8009(89)90020-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Costanza R. 2001. Visions, Values, Valuation, and the Need for an Ecological Economics. BioScience, 51 (6): 459-468.10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0459:VVVATN]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[Cotton M., Devine-Wright P. 2011. Discourses of energy infrastructure development: a Q-method study of electricity transmission line siting in the UK. Environ. Plan.- A, 43 (4), 942.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cotton M. 2015. Stakeholder perspectives on shale gas fracking: a Q-method study of environmental discourses. Environ. Plan.- A, 47 (9): 1944-1962.10.1177/0308518X15597134]Search in Google Scholar
[Cotton M.D., Mahroos-Alsaiari A.A. 2015. Key actor perspectives on stakeholder engagement in Omani Environmental Impact Assessment: an application of Q-Methodology. J. Environ. Plan. Manage., 58 (1): 91-112.]Search in Google Scholar
[Curry R., Barry J., McClenaghan A. 2013. Northern Visions? Applying Q methodology to understand stakeholder views on the environmental and resource dimensions of sustainability. J. Environ. Plan. Manage., 56 (5): 624-649.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dasgupta P., Vira B. 2005. Q Methodology’ for Mapping Stakeholder Perceptions In Participatory Forest Management. the UK Department for International Development (DFID) for the benefit of developing countries under its Natural Resources Systems Programme (project no R8280).]Search in Google Scholar
[Davies B.B., Hodge I.D. 2007. Exploring environmental perspectives in lowland agriculture: A Q methodology study in East Anglia, UK. J. Ecol. Econ., 61: 323-333.]Search in Google Scholar
[Del Angel-Perez A.L., Villagomez-Cortes J.A. 2014. Environment Perceptions and Conservation Preferences along the Coatepec-La Antigua Watershed, México. J. Human Ecol., 46 (3): 309-318.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dibrell C., Craig J,B., Hansen E.N. 2011. How managerial attitudes toward the natural environment affect market orientation and innovation. J. Bus. Res., 64: 401-407.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dryzek J. 1997. Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ellis G., Barry J., Robinson C. 2007. Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. J. Environ. Plan. Manage., 50 (4): 517-551.10.1080/09640560701402075]Search in Google Scholar
[Frantzi S., Carter N.T., Lovett J.C. 2009. Exploring discourses on international environmental regime effectiveness with Q methodology: A case study of the Mediterranean Action Plan. J. Environ. Plan. Manage., 90: 177-18610.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Ghimire D.J., Mohai P. 2005. Environmentalism and Contraceptive Use: How people in less developed settings approach environmental issues. Popul. Environ., 27, (1): 29-61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gowdy G., Erickson J.D. 2005. The approach of ecological economics. Cambridge J. Econ., 29: 207-222.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gutierrez R.C. 2006. What is Ecological Economics? by Earth Econ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall C., Wreford A. 2012. Adaptation to climate change: the attitudes of stakeholders in the livestock industry. Mitigation Adaptation Strategies Global Change, 17 (2): 207-222.10.1007/s11027-011-9321-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Haq S.M.A., Vanwing T. 2010. Perception, Environmental Degradation and Family Size Preference: a Context of Developing Countries. J. Sustain. Dev.., 3 (4): 102-108.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heckbert S. Baynes T., Reeson A. 2010. Agent- based modeling ecological economics. Annals of the New York academy of sciences. Issue: Ecol. Econ. Rev.: 39-53.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05286.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hafrichter R. 1993. Toxic struggles; the theory and practice of environmental justice (No. GTZ-971).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hornsby J.S., Kuratko D.F., Zahra S.A. 2002. Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. J. Bus. Venturin, 17: 253-273.10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00059-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Hosseini S.E., Andwari A.M., Wahid M.A., Bagheri G. 2013. A review on green energy potentials in Iran. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 27: 533-545.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hunter L.M., Strife S. 2010. Environmental Perceptions of Rural South African Residents: The Complex Nature of Environmental Concern. Soc. Natur. Res., 23: 525-541.]Search in Google Scholar
[Iizuka M. 2000. Role of Environmental Awareness in Achieving Sustainable Development. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, under the project ‘Enhancement of Citizen’s Awareness in Formulation of Pollution Control Policies in Major Latin American Cities’, Environment and Human Settlements Division of ECLAC Inagami M., Ohno R. 2009. Anisotropy of environmental perception caused by spatial changes during locomotion. J. Environ. Psychol., 30: 1-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Iran National climate office, 2003. Second National Communication to UNFCCC. www.Climate-chang.ir.]Search in Google Scholar
[Iran National climate office, 2010. Second National Communication to UNFCCC. www.Climate-chang.ir.]Search in Google Scholar
[Keary M. 2011. Message in a model: Technological optimism in climate change mitigation modeling. www.whpress.co.uk.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kincaid, M. (2011). A Q-methodology Study: Stakeholder perspectives on the future management of Capitol Lake, Olympia, Washington. Thesis for Master of Environmental Studies Degree, Evergreen State College.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kollmuss A., Ageyman J. 2002. Mind the Gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to proenvironmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res., 8 (3): 239-260.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lauber T.B., Tidball K.G. 2014. Characterizing Healthy Urban Systems: Implications for Urban Environmental Education. Cities and the Environment (CATE), 7 (2). Available at: htt://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/cate/vol7/iss2/2.]Search in Google Scholar
[Logo E. 2013. Q-methodology method based environmental awareness measurement in transportation. Int. J. Traffic Trans. Engin., 3 (1): 45-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mol P.J. 2002. Ecological Modernization and the Global Economy. Global Environ. Politics, 2 (2): 92-115.]Search in Google Scholar
[Musich S., Hook D., Baaner S., Spooner M., Edington D.W. 2006. The Association of Corporate Work Environment Factors, Health Risks, and Medical Conditions with Presenteeism Among Australian Employees. Amer. J.10.4278/0890-1171-21.2.12717152252]Search in Google Scholar
[Health Promot.: November/December. 21 (2): 127-136.]Search in Google Scholar
[Næss A. 1973. The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement. Inquiry, 16: 95-100.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nwagbara E.N., Abia R.P., Uyang, F.A., Ejeje J.A. 2012. Poverty, Environmental Degradation and Sustainable Development: A Discourse. Global J. Human Soc. Sci., 12. (11). Online ISSN: 2249-460x & Print ISSN: 0975-587X.]Search in Google Scholar
[Perkins P.E. 2007. Feminist Ecological Economics and Sustainability. J. Bioecon., 9: 227-244.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poortinga W., Steg L., Vlek C. 2004. Values, Environmental concern and environmental behavior. A study In to Household Energy Use. Environ. Behav., 36 (1): 70-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ramalho-Guedes G., Luiz-Do-Carmo R. 2013. Self-interest versus collective action: understanding cross-class environmental perception, knowledge and behavior in Brazil. Papeles de poblacion, 19 (78): 223-258.]Search in Google Scholar
[Redclift M. 1993. Sustainable Development: Needs, Values, Rights. Environ. Values, 2 (1): 3-20.10.3197/096327193776679981]Search in Google Scholar
[Schlosberg D. 2007. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith K.R. 1993. Fuel combustion, air pollution exposure, and health: the situation in developing countries. Annu. Rev. Energ. Environ., 18 (1): 529-566.]Search in Google Scholar
[Steelman T.A., Maguire L.A. 1999. Understanding participant perspectives: Q-methodology in national forest management. J. Policy Analysis Manage., 18 (3): 361-388.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stephenson W. 1953. The study of behavior: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stergiou D., Airey D. 2011. Q-methodology and tourism research. Curr. Iss. Tourism, 14, 4: 311-322.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stern P.C. 2000. Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. J. Soc. Iss., 56(3). 407-424.]Search in Google Scholar
[Swedeen P. 2006. Post-normal science in practice: A Q study of the potential for sustainable forestry in Washington State, USA. Ecol. Econ., 57, 190-208.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Utzinger J., Wyss K., Moto D.D., Tanner M., Singer B.H. 2005. Assessing health impacts of the Chad-Cameroon petroleum development and pipeline project: challenges and a way forward. Environ. impact assessment rev., 25(1), 63-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Venables D., Pidgeon N., Simmons P., Henwood K., Parkhill K. 2009. Living with Nuclear Power: A Q‐Method Study of Local Community Perceptions. Risk Analysis, 29(8), 1089-1104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Warf B. 2006. Encyclopedia of Human Geography. SAGE Publ., Inc.http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/humangeography/n88.xml.10.4135/9781412952422]Search in Google Scholar
[Weekes V.L. 2008. Attitudes and perspectives towards water and water management in the towns of Gibsons, British Colombia. Simon Fraser University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zabala A. 2014. Q method: A Package to Explore Human Perspectives Using Q Methodology. The R Journal, 6/2.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zand Hessami H., Yousefi P. 2013. Investigation of major factors influencing green purchasing behavior: Interactive approach. Eur. online J. Natur. Soc. Sci., 2 (4). 584-596. ]Search in Google Scholar